This case is over, and Italy finally did the right thing.
Before it was over, many on the innocence side said it was over despite Italy's fun and games, and getting stuck in the "judicial truth" trap - that Hellmann effectively ended it and it was "judicial truth only" after that, regardless of what ISC (March 213) and the Nencini court did. By any rational standard, ISC (2013) and the Nencini court simply came to conclusions against the evidence. It's the reason why many on the innocence side were convinced that the March 2015 version would simply continue the grand tradition begun by the 2013 Chieffi section of the ISC.
The Massei court rejected most of the Mignini/Comodi prosecution in 2009, substituting in its motivations report a very different crime than the one Mignini opened with, much less the one he closed with in Dec 2009. As even Vixen conceded it was musical motives, and simply a sideshow.... the only motive that the guilters would not entertain was no motive at all.
Which brings this back..... there never really was a case against AK and RS. Heck, on the night of the first conviction, even Barbie Latza Nadeau said as much, reporting from Perguia to a CNN audience..... "The prosecution case was weak, but the defence case was weaker. This could very well be overturned at appeal."
The people you name above, Kaosium, are simply resistant to the evidence. That is the only objective way of putting it.
Vixen didn't invent the memes he/she is bringing here... he/she is just repeating them as if they haven't already been long since disproven. Vixen thinks that Conti and Vecchiotti's appointment was.... well, to repeat:
The thing which separates a guilter from someone who believes in guilt, is that the former will say stuff like that: seemingly resistant to logic. There's just a commitment to phrase something in the most guilt-like way possible, hoping to slip it unnoticed under the door.
The thing which separates a guilter from someone who believes in guilt is the constant turning of tables - what properly belongs to the prosecution, in proving their allegations, is always flipped back onto Knox or Sollecito.... "I wonder why Raffaele never complained about police mistreatment..." "I wonder why Knox never laid a charge for her allegation of being hit...." "I wonder why the defence never asked for a test of the semen sample....." "Contamination must be proven or else all DNA convictions since 1986 are at risk....." "The defence was happy with the disclosure from Stefanoni, they never asked for the EDFs....."
Guilters act as if the prosecutions were simply a blank slate, not really an actor in this tragedy begun with a horrid murder.
It's got to do with arguing in good faith. You know, things like when shown the evidence which refutes a guilter claim, the guilter does not get to return to the same factoid three Continuations later as if nothing was shown!
