Hillary Clinton is Done

Status
Not open for further replies.
Roger Ramjets said:
You're right - what a nightmare! Such a scenario would never have occurred if a Republican was in charge.

Oh wait,
13 Benghazis That Occurred on Bush’s Watch
Click to expand...

False equivalence for the WIN! Well I'm certainly not going to vote for Bush then! :rolleyes:

/I do enjoy that they call events like an RPG shot at an empty embassy in Athens where not only did no one die, no one was even hurt, a "Benghazi.":jaw-dropp
 
Last edited:
16.5 said:
False equivalence for the WIN! Well I'm certainly not going to vote for Bush then! :rolleyes:

/I do enjoy that they call events like an RPG shot at an empty embassy in Athens where not only did no one die, no one was even hurt, a "Benghazi.":jaw-dropp
Click to expand...
No one would have been hurt at Benghazi if perpetrators had "missed" as well.
 
16.5 said:
False equivalence for the WIN! Well I'm certainly not going to vote for Bush then! :rolleyes:

/I do enjoy that they call events like an RPG shot at an empty embassy in Athens where not only did no one die, no one was even hurt, a "Benghazi.":jaw-dropp
Click to expand...

Would you care to comment about the 99 fatalities that occurred as a result of attacks against US diplomatic facilities during President Bush's tenure, with nary a peep from the Faux News outrage machine?
 
Am I correct?

The basic rundown is the Secretary of State, approving Uranium production to be purchased by Russian Companies, while the Russian Companies are donating millions of dollars to The Clinton Foundation and hiring her husband to speak?

Was there also a deal with President Obama that she would publicly disclose all foreign donations?

Tell me if I'm missing something.
 
jhunter1163 said:
Would you care to comment about the 99 fatalities that occurred as a result of attacks against US diplomatic facilities during President Bush's tenure, with nary a peep from the Faux News outrage machine?
Click to expand...

In THIS thread? Hell no.

Maybe post one in history or something, and I'll take a gander
 
Cleon said:
Anyone want to make an avatar bet whether Hillary is "done" or not?
Click to expand...

I signed in to suggest that to EG3000. You beat me to it.

Of course, the tricky bit is that no one has yet defined "done."
Does it mean she stops running now?
Does it mean she won't get nominated?
Does it mean she won't get elected?
 
Roger Ramjets said:
If past embassy attacks are 'history' then why did you bring one up? And in what way do they make Hillary getting elected a 'nightmare scenario'?
Click to expand...

C'mon man, the attacks under BUSH are history.

Hillary is running for President, right now today. C'mon man.....
 
xjx388 said:
A Democrat is a member of the Democratic Party. Thus, if one wants to shorten that to Democrat Party I don't think that's a "sneaky rhetorical tactic," or imputes the "honesty of the speaker."
Click to expand...
Too busy to type those extra two letters? Too important? Cut the baloney. It is done on purpose with the intent of saying a name wrong for no good reason. It is beneath the dignity of anyone who wishes to pretend he is arguing actual ideas. There's plenty to argue about without carrying on like a schoolyard brat.
 
16.5 said:
C'mon man, the attacks under BUSH are history.

Hillary is running for President, right now today. C'mon man.....
Click to expand...


There's the proof that you and the rest of the witch hunters couldn't care less about what happened to those people in Benghazi. It's all about the political hit job.
 
Ladewig said:
I signed in to suggest that to EG3000. You beat me to it.

Of course, the tricky bit is that no one has yet defined "done."
Does it mean she stops running now?
Does it mean she won't get nominated?
Does it mean she won't get elected?
Click to expand...

EG3000, what do you say?
 
Her husband got reelected after his party losing the House and Senate and being impeached for having sex with an intern and lying about it.mTheClinton campaign machine remains a force to be reckoned with. The Republicans are shaping up to spit out a beaten and bloody piece of damaged goods in yet another freak show cum gladiatorial contest. She's a long way from being done.
 
Craig4 said:
Her husband got reelected after his party losing the House and Senate and being impeached for having sex with an intern and lying about it.mTheClinton campaign machine remains a force to be reckoned with. The Republicans are shaping up to spit out a beaten and bloody piece of damaged goods in yet another freak show cum gladiatorial contest. She's a long way from being done.
Click to expand...


The scandal and impeachment was 2nd term. Whether he could have won a hypothetical 3rd term is interesting to speculate about. His approval numbers were quite high at the end of his presidency, despite it all.
 
Craig4 said:
Her husband got reelected after his party losing the House and Senate and being impeached for having sex with an intern and lying about it.mTheClinton campaign machine remains a force to be reckoned with. The Republicans are shaping up to spit out a beaten and bloody piece of damaged goods in yet another freak show cum gladiatorial contest. She's a long way from being done.
Click to expand...

Don't forget the infamous "Clinton death list," where the right wing of the GOP was literally claiming that the Clintons had a bunch of people whacked in order to gain power and money.

I really don't think there's anything they haven't accused the Clintons of doing already.
 
Puppycow said:
Not sure this story means she's "done".

I did read the Times article yesterday, minus the Breitbart spin. This was money given to the Clinton Foundation, a charitable organization, and not the Clintons themselves. Nevertheless, such donations could still tend to make the Clintons more sympathetic to the person giving the donation, even though the money doesn't go directly into their pockets. That seems like human nature. But does that mean her decisions were any different than they otherwise would be? It's another gray issue, not really a black-and-white one for a lot of people I would imagine. And the money supposedly goes to a good, charitable cause. So make of it what you will.
Click to expand...

Give a $145 million donation from a corporation the benefit of the doubt, yet this thread is crammed with auto-rejection of a story because it was on Breitbart.

Gosh, I wonder if Jeb Bush had such a massive donation to a charity of his (if he has any) would receive the same consideration, or if it would be portrayed of his collusion with devils and demons.

The healthy American should presume corruption in all dealings by politicians until proven otherwise. With science, it's poor taste to question the arguerer, only the argument.

Properly speaking, the opposite is true for politicians. Presume ulterior motives.
 
Cavemonster said:
It's neither of those things, it's a part of a deliberate strategy to rebrand using language.

Listen to some right wing radio, plenty of them love to talk about the "Democrat" party.
Click to expand...
And they don't pronounce it "democrat" it's always "DemocRAT"

xjx388 said:
A Democrat is a member of the Democratic Party. Thus, if one wants to shorten that to Democrat Party I don't think that's a "sneaky rhetorical tactic," or imputes the "honesty of the speaker."
Click to expand...
Is it ok to refer to Cruz as the Republic candidate or that he's a Republic? No, of course not. You don't hear that kind of silliness because Democrats graduated from 5th grade a long time ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom