Is there a legitimate reason to question the official narrative*?

[Tony Szamboti]

No because expert witness testimony from actual.structural engineering professionals by the thousands and that the effect happened twice in one day, would have a grand Jury laughing at you!
You would be the clown in the room just Like Harrit- Jones's with even less respect!

I don't think anyone would be laughing. A court proceeding on this issue of when the inward bowing of the south face of the North Tower occurred would be quite embarrassing for NIST.

The lack of mechanism for what they say happened isn't their only problem. They also have no video to prove what they say, and the police helicopter was taking video.

The timing by NIST, of inward bowing being alleged to have occurred minutes before collapse, is clearly concocted to fit with the story they wanted to tell and is most definitely not what happened. The exterior column inward bowing and buckling occurred when the core dropped at collapse initiation.

 

[Animal]

Speaking of "lack of mechanism". Got one for your "theory" or is that also a flying saucer?

This is so pathetic....TZ claiming something did not happen because "the mechanism" cannot be fully explained. Despite photographic evidence and corroborating eye witness accounts. This is purely desperation on his part as the inward bowing shreds his fantasy. Yet he continues down this dead end to preserve his cult like beliefs.

In a country that two people could not keep a stained blue dress a secret, TZ would have everyone believe that tens of thousands of people were involved in a conspiracy that killed thousand of other citizens and caused billions of dollars in damage. It is beyond pathetic......but the MA prohibits me full fully describing what I think.

 

[Spanx]

When is this imaginary court case taking place ?

 

[GlennB]

I don't think anyone would be laughing. A court proceeding on this issue of when the inward bowing of the south face of the North Tower occurred would be quite embarrassing for NIST.

The lack of mechanism for what they say happened isn't their only problem. They also have no video to prove what they say, and the police helicopter was taking video.
The timing by NIST, of inward bowing being alleged to have occurred minutes before collapse, is clearly concocted to fit with the story they wanted to tell and is most definitely not what happened. The exterior column inward bowing and buckling occurred when the core dropped at collapse initiation.

Tony must have me on ignore. The photos I've been posting are from a still camera.

 

[Tony Szamboti]

This is so pathetic....TZ claiming something did not happen because "the mechanism" cannot be fully explained. Despite photographic evidence and corroborating eye witness accounts. This is purely desperation on his part as the inward bowing shreds his fantasy. Yet he continues down this dead end to preserve his cult like beliefs.

In a country that two people could not keep a stained blue dress a secret, TZ would have everyone believe that tens of thousands of people were involved in a conspiracy that killed thousand of other citizens and caused billions of dollars in damage. It is beyond pathetic......but the MA prohibits me full fully describing what I think.

I would have people who had access to the interiors of those buildings investigated because there is extensive evidence that the collapses were caused by controlled demolition and that there were people other than those on the planes involved.

The fact that you and others here do not want that done says volumes about you.

 

[Tony Szamboti]

Tony must have me on ignore. The photos I've been posting are from a still camera.

Why isn't there video of this alleged inward bowing taking place minutes before collapse?

That would support what you are saying much more than a still photo which can be manipulated.

 

[GlennB]

Why isn't there video of this alleged inward bowing taking place minutes before collapse?

That would support what you are saying much more than a still photo which can be manipulated.

There are three there (though there are others in the series) all showing bowing. The change of angle and content means a passage of time (confirmed by the exif data), which means they would all have to have been photoshopped entirely to introduce the bowing. Previously you've suggested that only the time was altered - are you now doubling-down on "total fake"?

 

[Animal]

I would have people who had access to the interiors of those buildings investigated because there is extensive evidence that the collapses were caused by controlled demolition and that there were people other than those on the planes involved.

The fact that you and others here do not want that done says volumes about you.

Still waiting for you to post that "extensive evidence" 13+ years and your evidence count remains at 0

No physical evidence, no seismic evidence, no audio, no photographic, NOTHING>

All you have is personal incredulity, fantasies, and personal insults.
You hand wave away actual evidence that shreds your fantasies. The fact that you believe tens of thousands of other citizens would be involved in such a conspiracy is pathetic....

 

[DGM]

Why isn't there video of this alleged inward bowing taking place minutes before collapse?

That would support what you are saying much more than a still photo which can be manipulated.

What makes you so sure there isn't? Who have you contacted in an attempt to support your claim?

Have you talked to the NYPD?

 

[Animal]

Why isn't there video of this alleged inward bowing taking place minutes before collapse?

That would support what you are saying much more than a still photo which can be manipulated.

And video cannot? LMAO........it is just another in the long series of hamster wheel moves by troofers.......evidence shred your theory....move the goal post and demand extra special evidence. You have 13+ of fail. Your desperation is pathetic.

 

[Spanx]

I would have people who had access to the interiors of those buildings investigated because there is extensive evidence that the collapses were caused by controlled demolition and that there were people other than those on the planes involved.

The fact that you and others here do not want that done says volumes about you.

There is not many people who you wouldn't have investigated including the "shills" on this forum.

In your eyes the only people not involved in the cover up are members of Ae911truth.

 

[Tony Szamboti]

There are three there (though there are others in the series) all showing bowing. The change of angle and content means a passage of time (confirmed by the exif data), which means they would all have to have been photoshopped entirely to introduce the bowing. Previously you've suggested that only the time was altered - are you now doubling-down on "total fake"?

I think someone at NIST changed the time on the photos to support the story they wanted to tell.

The reason I say this is that there is no mechanism to support their contention and there isn't even video of it and we know the police helicopter was taking video.

The article also shows they attempted to create a cover as to why others hadn't heard it on 9/11/2001. The real reason is it didn't happen.

 

[Animal]

There is not many people who you wouldn't have investigated including the "shills" on this forum.

In your eyes the only people not involved in the cover up are members of Ae911truth.

Having done work in the WTC (in the lower level mall) as well as various other building in Manhattan..........the number of people that would have had to be "in on" the conspiracy would easily be in the tens of thousands. Troofers remain clueless

 

[Tony Szamboti]

There is not many people who you wouldn't have investigated including the "shills" on this forum.

In your eyes the only people not involved in the cover up are members of Ae911truth.

This seems to be just sore loser garbage talk because you don't like to be shown your theory is nonsense and isn't what happened.

 

[Tony Szamboti]

And video cannot? LMAO........it is just another in the long series of hamster wheel moves by troofers.......evidence shred your theory....move the goal post and demand extra special evidence. You have 13+ of fail. Your desperation is pathetic.

Video at least has a lot more problems being manipulated and it has inherent timing and other things going on which could corroborate it.

Don't forget what I am saying is also buttressed by the fact that NIST could not supply a mechanism for inward bowing of the south face of the North Tower occurring minutes before its collapse.

 

[DGM]

Video at least has a lot more problems being manipulated and it has inherent timing and other things going on which could corroborate it.

Don't forget what I am saying is also buttressed by the fact that NIST could not supply a mechanism for inward bowing of the south face of the North Tower occurring minutes before its collapse.

Will this all be part of the suit you're seeking to file against the NIST?

 

[Spanx]

This seems to be just sore loser garbage talk because you don't like to be shown your theory is nonsense and isn't what happened.

And what exactly have you won ?

As far as I can see you live in a fantasy land and that's not a joke or insult.

As far as garbage talk goes you need to read your own posts.

Seriously Tony, talk to someone outside of 911 truth, maybe stand on a street corner asking other people's views, perhaps family members.

 

[Tony Szamboti]

Will this all be part of the suit you're seeking to file against the NIST?

I would think that when an actual investigation occurs this will come up.

I am just showing those here why what they were told about inward bowing of the south face of the North Tower occurring minutes before collapse cannot be true.

 

[Tony Szamboti]

And what exactly have you won ?

As far as I can see you live in a fantasy land and that's not a joke or insult.

As far as garbage talk goes you need to read your own posts.

Seriously Tony, talk to someone outside of 911 truth, maybe stand on a street corner asking other people's views, perhaps family members.

Everyone I talk to outside of the regulars on this forum agrees with what I am saying when I give the explanations I did here. It does make one wonder about the regulars like you here.

 

[DGM]

I would think that when an actual investigation occurs this will come up.

I am just showing those here why what they were told about inward bowing of the south face of the North Tower occurring minutes before collapse cannot be true.

So is that a no?

You haven't actually shown anything. You've denied a lot.