Bilderberg in the news ?

So Bubba how do about 150 people from different countries and different career path run a world wide shadow government - please explain?
 
Bubba said:
There you go again. Taking me literally when I'm joking.
Click to expand...

What evidence do you have that people can tell when you're joking? Besides, the "Ha ha, just kidding" argument is the one typically deployed to back away from a position that has been demonstrated to be absurd.

I put the copypasta Dodd transcript...
Click to expand...

You miss the point. All your threads are simply stuff pasted from the web, most often from questionable sources. The responses you receive are largely people simply showing how the claims you copy are either internally inconsistent or patently absurd on their face -- things you could arrive at on your own if you reviewed your sources carefully before offering them up.

I'm still waiting for your profile of a hypothetical shadow government operation, btw.
Click to expand...

It would operate in the shadow.

Why bother with this anyway? I mean if you believe there is nothing to it?
Click to expand...

Critical thinking is its own reward.

Are you 100% sure about Bilderberg?
Click to expand...

Loaded question.

So, anything similar re Bilderberg?
Click to expand...

No, I don't consider them remotely similar.
 
JayUtah said:
Yes. The forum rules require that I assume your posts are sincere until you say otherwise. That doesn't stop me from being largely tongue-in-cheek the past page or so. As has been said by others, your copypasta from the web is getting old. But yes, I have to assume you're serious. Going page after page and then finally admitting that you're ranting and raving? I promise it's not your critics who look foolish after such an exercise.
Click to expand...

Is that a new rule, or have I overlooked it all these years?
 
marplots said:
Is that a new rule, or have I overlooked it all these years?
Click to expand...

I'll defer to the mods to clarify, but questioning a poster's sincerity of an argument has, in the past, been considered attacking the poster rather than his argument. No, I can't cite any specific rule to that narrow effect.
 
Hans said:
So Bubba how do about 150 people from different countries and different career path run a world wide shadow government - please explain?
Click to expand...

Good question. If those 150 were in charge, I suppose they'd perform the same or worse than any govt organization of similar size. However in the model, they are not in charge. I thought it was understood that per the claims, those 150 are more like bureaucrats. In the model, the most powerful presumably don't even need to attend.

The whole thing ought to run as smoothly and faction-free as any human run outfit of comparable size, (to respond to your earlier question.)

The rosters show prominent players in the accepted visible realms of power. That to me represents the mechanism of transferring policies from groups like Bilderberg to the various target governments. Not saying the hypothetical mechanism is well oiled and infallible.

To me it just makes sense that changes like EU and predecessor EEU would at least in part originate in groups like Bb, with members returning to parliaments and golf courses to implement the plans. Kinda like how governments work as it is.

***

Thanks for your answers, J U.
 
Last edited:
JayUtah said:
I'll defer to the mods to clarify, but questioning a poster's sincerity of an argument has, in the past, been considered attacking the poster rather than his argument. No, I can't cite any specific rule to that narrow effect.
Click to expand...

Thank you for the clarification. I'm always askeered I'll mess up through ignorance instead of spite.
 
Bubba said:
Thank you.

The press isnt interested. Simple as that.

Makes perfect sense. Why should the press be interested anyway?

That then probably solves the Rockefeller quote (below) as being 100% bogus.

.
Click to expand...

There is insufficient evidence that that quote is real.
Check wikiquote.org under David Rockefeller
 
I bet they totally talk about themselves this way.

The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
Click to expand...
 
Bubba said:
Good question. If those 150 were in charge, I suppose they'd perform the same or worse than any govt organization of similar size. However in the model, they are not in charge. I thought it was understood that per the claims, those 150 are more like bureaucrats. In the model, the most powerful presumably don't even need to attend.
Click to expand...

Why do you assume anyone is in charge in the first place?
 
caveman1917 said:
Why do you assume anyone is in charge in the first place?
Click to expand...

One explanation I've seen of the CT'ers need of a conspiracy to be 'in charge' is that the reality, tens of millions of conflicting ideologies, parties, and people is confusing and scary while one group is comforting, like a child thinking their parents are in charge.
 
Bubba said:
To me it just makes sense that changes like EU and predecessor EEU would at least in part originate in groups like Bb, with members returning to parliaments and golf courses to implement the plans. Kinda like how governments work as it is.
Click to expand...

Yes and such ideas need not come from a 'shadow' government but exactly as portrayed - a working group of influential people sharing ideas.
 
Originally Posted by Bubba View Post
Old fashioned common sense, for one.
Click to expand...

What the same 'old fashioned common sense', that told us the illness was caused by demons and ill winds? That the world was the center of the Universe and that we should kill anyone who didn't believe in our religion? Those kinds of old fashioned common sense? lol
 
Hans said:
What the same 'old fashioned common sense', that told us the illness was caused by demons and ill winds?
Click to expand...

Exactly why I keep the house sealed and never bath. A good stink keeps the demons away.
That the world was the center of the Universe and that we should kill anyone who didn't believe in our religion?
Click to expand...

Yeah, the sense in that does seem to be common. :(

Those kinds of old fashioned common sense? lol
Click to expand...

Don't forget that physical deformities are a sign of depravity in the soul, or that bullets knock people through windows, or that rockets make sound in space, or that you can take a 20' jump off an unprepared ramp in a car and it won't be damaged, or that bigfoot lives in the woods, or aliens visit the Earth, or that...

Well, you get the idea :D
 
The Bilderbers do serve one valuable purpose. Annually, they remind us that Alex Jones is an asshat and that he's not embarrassed to pander / lie / gimmick stuff that gives his fans what they want so they continue funding his paranoia media empire. See: Bullhorning Bilderberger for more.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom