Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

[Drewbot]

No, it's a working theoryWAG. Meaning I don't have it all figured out as of yet. I'm working on it. I don't know "where" they're going or "where" they're coming from. I'm trying to find that stuff out. Any ideas at this point are only theoriesWAGS and are unproven. I think the "why" is food related but again that's just a theory.WAG.

You don't even know they are ranging or migrating, you have no clue.
Maybe they are there, but are standing right behind you, and not ranging at all.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

Chris, are you trained in biology? It seems to me that someone trained in relevant disciplines might be able to come up more than one method to try to determine the where and why of an alleged "migration" path. Perhaps scat analysis? Maybe some clues could be found in what the animals are eating or have eaten?

It seems that footers want to, ironically, place the bar so high that it seems unreasonable for us to ask for results. Examples from Chris would be:

Photos and video are useless without biological evidence.
Only a body would prove bigfoot.
I must catch and track one in order to flesh out movement patterns.

And so on....

One of my main goals is to find some Bigfoot scat. And yes you are correct it would tell a great deal about the creatures from what they're eating to the kind of parasites they carry among other things. But unfortunately Bigfoot scat is not easy to come by. If you have Bigfoot scat, you have Bigfoot on record.
Chris B.

 

[dmaker]

Bigfoots don't poop while migrating?

They don't poop after enjoying a pine bark buffet?

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

You don't even know they are ranging or migrating, you have no clue.
Maybe they are there, but are standing right behind you, and not ranging at all.

Activity in that area seems to be seasonal. I don't believe they could live unnoticed in that area year round. My "WAG" about food gathering is based on things like stripped fruit trees and other things, so there is some basis.
Chris B.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

Bigfoots don't poop while migrating?

They don't poop after enjoying a pine bark buffet?

Certainly they do, but where? Do you know? Do they leave floaters in the river? Do they bury it like cats in a litter box? I've not found any though I think I know what to look for based on a good description from the older gentleman in Logan county KY. Chris B.

 

[Resume]

Certainly they do, but where? Do you know? Do they leave floaters in the river? Do they bury it like cats in a litter box? I've not found any though I think I know what to look for based on a good description from the older gentleman in Logan county KY. Chris B.

Do your footies traipse about randomly? Or might they travel on already extablished game trails as do other game? Perhaps they trailblaze themselves; I would imagine a group (a fantasy of footies?) of 6 to 9-ft 600-lb bipedal apes would leave some sign of their passing.

You might look there.

 

[tsig]

I haven't used GoPros myself - do they autofocus, or do they have an extremely deep depth of focus like an Instamatic camera?

If it's the former, I'd be dubious about using them in a forest. There's every chance they'd focus on a tree or something instead of what the user intended to capture.

And I should probably say that in my opinion, a photograph would be the last step in making a case about Bigfoot. If Bigfoot were real, we'd have his DNA long before authentic photographs.

We'd have the monkey.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

Well, what was your 15' claim exactly? You know, in the interest of honesty. Do you even remember or do you want someone else to do the work for you? If this is a lie, rather than a memory error (as to which we all are subject) defend yourself.

Do I even remember? Certainly I remember, the truth is easy to remember. The difficulty in memory seems to be among skeptics as evidenced above when they're making things up. Don't expect me to simply stand by while others put their words in my mouth. I know full well what I've said and what I haven't.
Chris B.

 

[tsig]

You don't even know they are ranging or migrating, you have no clue.
Maybe they are there, but are standing right behind you, and not ranging at all.

"The eyes of the ranger are upon you.
Any thing you do he's gonna see,

When you're a'footin' look behind you,
'cause that's where the footie's gonna be"

 

[Drewbot]

Wouldn't it be a great ad campaign, for a point and shoot digital camera, to have a BIGFOOTIN' GUARANTEE Commercial? Voiceover: We promise that your photos of Bigfoot will not come out blurry because of our camera...

 

[Slowvehicle]

I've never thought that battle applies to Yetis as I have previously pointed out a good link to an article by Loren Coleman that discusses why Alexander the Great did NOT fight Yetis.

So, now the Yeti originated in the 1930's? ABP claims it originates from the 1950's so which is it? Nat Geo never claims when the Yeti originated but says it dates back to 326 BC and Alexander the Great.

Which claim do I believe? Are any of them accurate? Not that I think you or ABP would try to falsely inject skeptical biased info about the Yeti, but I'm kinda siding with National Geographic until I've seen proof of something different. Chris B.

Is it possible for you to post without equivocation?

You might help your cause if you would not be so careless as to make the highlighted claim, or its ilk.

Do yourself a favour and investigate the etymology of the term.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

Do your footies traipse about randomly? Or might they travel on already extablished game trails as do other game? Perhaps they trailblaze themselves; I would imagine a group (a fantasy of footies?) of 6 to 9-ft 600-lb bipedal apes would leave some sign of their passing.

You might look there.

I've not found any tracks on game trails. I'm going to release some info as it may benefit other footers reading this thread.

The best trackway I've found and followed did not travel on game trails and the movements were odd and random. They indicated some sort of searching behavior. Up hill , down hill, zig zagging from one tree to another then nothing. They lost me after about 1.5 to 2 miles. I think I know how they did it now, I believe they tapped the tree. So next time I will be better prepared and more difficult to lose. At the time I had no idea they would or could climb trees, I've accepted they can and sometimes do climb for some reason.
Chris B.

 

[Slowvehicle]

Do I even remember? Certainly I remember, the truth is easy to remember. The difficulty in memory seems to be among skeptics as evidenced above when they're making things up. Don't expect me to simply stand by while others put their words in my mouth. I know full well what I've said and what I haven't.
Chris B.

Ripetiamo:

...1. Do you claim to have a high-resolution photo of a Bigfoot?

2. If so, about how far away was it?

3. If so, is there anything obscuring the Bigfoot in the photo?

4. If so, how many Bigfeet are in the photo?

 

[Giordano]

Do I even remember? Certainly I remember, the truth is easy to remember. The difficulty in memory seems to be among skeptics as evidenced above when they're making things up. Don't expect me to simply stand by while others put their words in my mouth. I know full well what I've said and what I haven't.
Chris B.

What was the truth about the photo again? You indicate that skeptics have poor memory. Care to help us out?

 

[LTC8K6]

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10303681&postcount=1797

Chris Bennett says:
April 1, 2010 at 9:16 pm

I don’t think they can read our minds or emotions or desires. I’ve had 2 encounters during the month of March. I was in the woods of course during both encounters. Carrying a 44 mag pistol and a camera. The pistol never left the holster but the camera did. If I had stayed at home during the month of March, I could have read a bit on the web I guess, but I wouldn’t have had those experiences. I’ll keep those with me for the rest of my life. Time well spent in the woods, and well worth the pain. I’ll be in the woods again tomorrow if I’m able.

Chris Bennett says:
April 4, 2010 at 6:20 pm

Not an April fool’s joke Lee, April 1st is not for Bigfoot in my book, Linda, I have pics and video from March, now for April, 12 MP HD video of at least 2 creatures in a brush pile peeking above it as I walked by them on 04-02-10, Video is under analysis. We’re gonna call it the “Wack-a-mole” video. It’s taken from 15 feet away, a full facial shot on one of the creatures..in focus..oh yes..more coming as I’m in the woods daily now except for today, Easter Sunday. Sounds too good to be true I know, but wait and see what happens…we have a plan to collect concrete proof of existence, and document the creatures without harming them, but we have to get it before they move from the area. Chris B.

 

[ChrisBFRPKY]

Is it possible for you to post without equivocation?

You might help your cause if you would not be so careless as to make the highlighted claim, or its ilk.

Do yourself a favour and investigate the etymology of the term.

Dude, I asked a question. Like this one: Is "equivocation" your word of the day or something? You may actually wish to check out the definition before applying it to me.
Chris B.

 

[carlitos]

Activity in that area seems to be seasonal.

Says the guy who didn't go out all winter. LOL.

 

[Giordano]

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10303681&postcount=1797

Thank you!

I guess that Chris does not believe them to be a "family group" and this is the basis of his denial of the prior posted claim. Unless Chris would like to clarify this a bit more.

 

[abaddon]

Do I even remember? Certainly I remember, the truth is easy to remember. The difficulty in memory seems to be among skeptics as evidenced above when they're making things up. Don't expect me to simply stand by while others put their words in my mouth. I know full well what I've said and what I haven't.
Chris B.

ORLY?

<snip>

Can we see your HD video that you shot 15 ft from the subject please? You claim to have this, but will not share it. Perhaps you have a different definition of dangle?

No you may not see anything other than what has already been released at this time. Once again, I do not have anything that will prove Bigfoot's existence conclusively at this time and have not claimed to have for that matter. I will share everything I've acquired when I have the missing piece(s).

<snip>

This is what I'm talking about. An HD video shot from 15 feet would be a serious piece of evidence. Do or do you not, Chris, have such a video?....and if you do...what exact reasons are keeping you from releasing it today?

No, it's not a serious piece of evidence. Todd Standing released facial shots that were/are hoaxes. What did he prove?
The reasons for not releasing some evidence are abundant. A few I can think of:
1. Do not feed the hoaxers.
2. Do not feed the story tellers.
3. Do not feed the mistaken witnesses.
4. Do not feed the actual witnesses.
5. Do not feed the skeptics until they will receive an undeniable 4 course meal.

How about one still frame? Just one HD still of bigfoot from the movie, from 15 feet away.

See above.

So why exactly were you explaining for pages the reasons for not releasing that video at 15 ft range for more than a few pages?

Are you now saying you don't have it at all?

If so, why did you spend so many pages refusing to release what you don't have?

If not, are you confirming that you do indeed have it?

Many posters asked for even a single frame from the 15 ft footage and you declined them all saying it would all be released when your "study" was complete.

What game are you really playing?

Oh. BLAARG. Right.

 

[dmaker]

Certainly they do, but where? Do you know? Do they leave floaters in the river? Do they bury it like cats in a litter box? I've not found any though I think I know what to look for based on a good description from the older gentleman in Logan county KY. Chris B.

Chris, this is just another example of making excuses for bigfoot. If bigfoot was a real animal, it would not be a mysterious task to collect scat. Particularly when you claim to be on a migration path or to have observed them feeding in an area. If bigfoot was a real animal, and the rest of your claims were true, you would have gathered reliable, testable evidence long before now. Instead you have empty pockets and even emptier excuses as to why bigfoot "research" yields zero results.