• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Post Your Art.

I'll be lazy and present you with a Photoshop collage instead of photographing one of my drawings or paintings:

View attachment 30214

Sort of cobbled together partially from other people's work for an old class project, but I'm pretty sure I'm within copyright fair use -- and Vermeer, for one, is too dead to sue me, anyway (17th century artist)... not that there's any money involved here.

If Marcel Duchamp can draw a moustache onto a print of the Mona Lisa and re-name it L.H.O.O.Q. (which, when pronounced in French, form the sentence "Elle a chaud au cul", which translates as "She is hot in the arse") then I don't think you have a problem with copyright.

Since I got a graphics tablet for my birthday about a year ago, I've been teaching myself (digital) art. Mostly still principles of traditional art - human anatomy and composition, shapes, volume, flow, colors etc. I had neglected drawing or years, but the digital medium sparked my interest - you can really concentrate more on the concept and less on your tools and canvas. So I've been following a lot of concept artists and watching how-tos. You can really self learn in this field in this day and age. I like to explore whatever fantasy, sci-fi or horror creeps in my mind.

Here's one I did recently "The Moment You Realize You're Going to Drown"

[qimg]http://25.media.tumblr.com/08ee95c8ee942e7ab13c8896d2889f60/tumblr_n0ledtLufB1tsrpxzo1_1280.jpg[/qimg]

Love those waves, and your use of light is really good.
@SlackerBabbath

I really dig your work. Beautiful.
Thankyou.
Here's one of my own seascapes.
_c733516_image_0.jpg
 
Last edited:
Here's another pshop collage:

Opt1.jpg

That's actually the Earth behind her, not the moon... using a luminosity layer. The Arabian sub-continent is fairly apparent once you know that.
 
Last edited:
That looks like a movie poster Manopolus.

Another of mine.
_c1131102_image_0.jpg


This is a view of my own town of Burnley with Pendle Hill in the background.
 
I made this portrait a while back, but only recently got a scanner. It is basically a manual printing/reproduction of a black and white photo of the Amazing One himself.
The style was inspired by Salvador Dali's "Lincoln in Dalivision" and the fact that I didn't have a printer back then:

vwdHW24.jpg


In a way, it is a sort of pareidolia. I think it's interesting to think of how low the resolution has to be for it to become a "true" pareidolia; if it were only 6 "pixels", would you still recognize who it is? If not, where's the threshold?

I also used this technique to counterfeit the Mona Lisa, though I doubt it will fool anyone:

5ykQIJA.jpg


ETA: Way too huge pictures, I'll repost them. ETA2: They work better when they're really small anyway:
wHkgjmQ.jpg
c0yNnlb.jpg
 
Last edited:
ETA: Way too huge pictures, I'll repost them. ETA2: They work better when they're really small anyway: [qimg]http://i.imgur.com/wHkgjmQ.jpg[/qimg] [qimg]http://i.imgur.com/c0yNnlb.jpg[/qimg]

Awesome. The big ones work well if you squint, basically morphing from pixelated mess into lifelike photos. What technique did you use to get the shades that exact? Some computerized pre-processing of reference photos (like photoshop filters or some such)?
 
Last edited:
Awesome. The big ones work well if you squint, basically morphing from pixelated mess into lifelike photos.

Thank you. Yes, the bigger ones work too. Part of the fun of those is that they get clearer when you squint. It seems counterintuitive, but my best guess is that the fuzziness makes it easier for the brain to "connect the dots" and recognize it. Perhaps because the fuzziness creates round edges, which is more natural for a face.

(When I said "way too huge", i referred to the original scans I posted originally, which were something around 3500 by 2500 pixels)

What technique did you use to get the shades that exact? Some computerized pre-processing of reference photos (like photoshop filters or some such)?

I used GIMP to get the blueprint for my grid paper. I desaturated the original photo's and tweaked the brightness/contrast, then I scaled and cropped them to the available number of pixels on my paper, and finally I used the "posterize" filter to reduce the number of colors to 6. This got me a pixel by pixel blueprint in black, white, and 4 shades of gray. I used 4 special coloring pens for the gray, and a regular one for the black. I didn't have to fill in the white, of course.

Been trying to practice black-white values recently.

Nice! How did you make those, on a graphics tablet?


:eek: Awesome instruments! Is that a Whamola(-banjo) on the right?
 
I've never really shown anyone my art, such as it is, because it doesn't photograph well; I have a gift for tiny writing, and I mean tiny. I could, literally, write the entire Gettysburg Address on a penny. I don't use a magnifying glass or any apparatus; just my naked eyes and a very steady hand.
 
Gosh! Nice work, everyone! I was thinking of putting up a card from a new CCG deck I'm working on, but you've all put me to shame.
 
I've never really shown anyone my art, such as it is, because it doesn't photograph well; I have a gift for tiny writing, and I mean tiny. I could, literally, write the entire Gettysburg Address on a penny. I don't use a magnifying glass or any apparatus; just my naked eyes and a very steady hand.

Very cool. What do you write with?
 
Very cool. What do you write with?

I use either an 0.3 mm mechanical pencil or a single-hair brush, depending what I'm writing on. If I'm using the pencil, I'll rub one side of the lead to wear it down to make it thinner. Mrs. JHunter1163 saw a street vendor once who would write your first name on a grain of rice; I wasn't impressed. I could write your full name. ;)
 
I use either an 0.3 mm mechanical pencil or a single-hair brush, depending what I'm writing on. If I'm using the pencil, I'll rub one side of the lead to wear it down to make it thinner. Mrs. JHunter1163 saw a street vendor once who would write your first name on a grain of rice; I wasn't impressed. I could write your full name. ;)

I'm very impressed! I do wish I could see some photos.
 
Thank you. Yes, the bigger ones work too. Part of the fun of those is that they get clearer when you squint. It seems counterintuitive, but my best guess is that the fuzziness makes it easier for the brain to "connect the dots" and recognize it. Perhaps because the fuzziness creates round edges, which is more natural for a face.

Yeah, it's quite weird. I recognized Mona Lisa of course, but Randi's pic seemed like a mess until I squinted. Our brain is a powerful post-processor, smoothing out sharp edges and filling in missing information. It works especially well with faces, since we're wired to recognize and look for them everywhere.

I used GIMP to get the blueprint for my grid paper. I desaturated the original photo's and tweaked the brightness/contrast, then I scaled and cropped them to the available number of pixels on my paper, and finally I used the "posterize" filter to reduce the number of colors to 6. This got me a pixel by pixel blueprint in black, white, and 4 shades of gray. I used 4 special coloring pens for the gray, and a regular one for the black. I didn't have to fill in the white, of course.

Aah, ok. Thought you used Photoshop's pixelate filter. Haven't used GIMP myself.


Nice! How did you make those, on a graphics tablet?

Yup, graphics tablet and Manga Studio 5 (I don't like Photoshop for anything other than photo manipulation). Had a reference photo on the side, desaturated to see the black and white values.

ETA: for the second pic (Dannii), I recorded a workflow video.
I have rather terrible 'artistic eye', so my method is basically sculpting - erasing and redrawing - from blocks of gibberish into something that starts to resemble the subject.
 
Last edited:
Thanks! All my junkers are used with slides.

:D

I see, that explains the high action as well. But that is a whammy bar-type handle at the top to change the tension of the strings, right? (Struggling with the terminology here, but I think you know what I mean).

Gosh! Nice work, everyone! I was thinking of putting up a card from a new CCG deck I'm working on, but you've all put me to shame.

Oh come on, no reason to feel ashamed! Look at what I did, I kicked a year-old thread to show off something that only really required some planning. Once I had the blueprint, not much additional creativity was required. Besides, we're all really nice here... right?

Looking forward to seeing your artwork soon. :D
 
I see, that explains the high action as well. But that is a whammy bar-type handle at the top to change the tension of the strings, right? (Struggling with the terminology here, but I think you know what I mean).

Which one are you referring to?
 

Back
Top Bottom