Would be really grateful if anyone could provide a translation of the blitzquotidiano.it article.
Meredith Kercher "killed only by Guede": Carmelo work, criminologist, convinced
PERUGIA - Great controversy and skepticism for many acquittal without referral , that ultimately issued by the Supreme Court in favor of the two defendants Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito, accused of murdering Meredith Kercher in Perugia on the night of November 1, 2007.
Controversy and skepticism due to the fact that those who have already been definitively convicted for the murder of Meredith, Rudy Herman Guede, was convicted "for competition" in the murder. Who sentenced him assumed then that he had accomplices, accomplices that until before the recent sentencing had precisely the names of Amanda and Raffaele.
Who killed Meredith Kercher then? If they ask especially the family of the victim. We ask it to criminologist Carmelo work , which is also criminalist, investigator, tracer profiles of likely offenders, crime scene analyst and director of the Centre for Studies Criminal Investigation, as well as professor at the University of L'Aquila for the subject Security & Protection people, events and institutions.
"Meredith Kercher was killed by a single person, Rudy Hermann Guede exactly. List six groups of nailing elements:
1. All traces of the murderous relate only to Guede; in the vagina of the victim is his DNA, the outside of the vagina has showy bruises, there are traces that the girl was ready and willing to sexual intercourse (no natural lubrication), on the cuff and on the clothes of the victim will are the traces of Guede: all this means sexual violence by Guede.
2. His presence at the crime scene at the time dell'accoltellamento is certain, his statements are contradictory and implausible, even states that out of the bathroom and saw the murderess who fought with him.
3. Guede was on the scene at the time of the crime so that upon himself to a stranger suddenly - happened not know when, how, why and where in the bedroom - the crime with an edged weapon.
4. The tracks bloody palm and footprints are Guede, as well as those of semen on the scene.
5. The flight abroad, the lies and contradictions of Guede are clear indications of "guilty conscience".
6. The fact that he was accustomed to commit acts of intrusion and theft is an indication of criminal profile very strong. "
But Rudi Guede was convicted of murder in competition with others, who are these others?
"These" others "do not exist. Are pure conjecture of 2007-2008 based on two false assumptions: that Meredith Kercher had been hit by two different weapons, which were present on the scene and the active Knox and Sollecito to the issue of the hooks, the knife and the footsteps of Sollecito. Elements then have proved false and / or inconsistent and confused ".
We want to investigate?
"Gladly. The issue of "competition with other" has no reason to exist because Guede killed Meredith alone, however the judges of first instance and appeal have considered - WRONGLY - that the "unknown" were just Amanda and Raffaele, so do not much unknown, all based on fallacious assumptions then demystified.
I remember that the judgment of the Supreme Court which sentenced definitely Guede wrote in relation to the Judges of First Instance and the homicidal competition:
"The judge of first instance (2008) that the crime had been committed in competition with other people, and for the traces of Kercher found on a knife seized in the house of the boy Knox, Raffaele Sollecito, both for the footprints left on the floor of the room Kercher ... ".
IT IS THEREFORE CLEAR THAT THE "UNKNOWN" TO GUP ARE 100% AMANDA AND RAPHAEL AND TRACKS ARE THOSE POI found FALLACI BUT HELD guilt-inducing - DURING - TOWARDS KNONX AND PROMPT, and that the DNA on the knife is not the victim, that the footprints are not Sollecito but Guede, that the DNA on the clasp is not Sollecito (evidence established in the appeal against Amanda and Raffaele), that there was a plural and therefore pollution LE TESTS WERE HELD truthful FALLACI.
Still, the Supreme Court on the appeal judgment condemning Rudi Guede writes: "In the opinion of the lower courts (2009), according to the most credible version of the facts, because of the presence of clear signs referable to the Knox and Sollecito in the house, the two together to Guede would enter the house where there would have been an escalation of violence, sexual purposes, the poor Meredith ... ".
SHOWS CLEAR THAT THE "UNKNOWN" TO THE JUDGES OF JUDGMENT appeal ARE 100% AMANDA AND RAPHAEL AND THAT THE "CLEAR TRACES" THOSE ARE THEN found FALLACI ... THEN "NOT CLEAR" ....
So, the scenario in which Rudi Guede killed Meredith in competition with Amanda and Raffaele is not shown, there is no evidence that such competition has occurred, everything suggests believe that Guede killed alone! The question "competition with others" is the logical fallacy called "begging the question" which anticipates the conclusion and to put it as a certain and proven, just to show what you can not prove. "
And on the wounds inflicted by two people tell us? Even this is true?
"We have gone from two unproven hypotheses, assumptions also become mistakenly, and then hook them with the link to the issue of reciprocity" competition with others (ie, the Knox and Sollecito).
The first assumption is fallacious that Meredith was killed with two different knives, then at least two murderers: I think this is pure conjecture and adaptation of the conclusions of the initial hypothesis; lacks expertise with certain conclusions in this regard and I am sure that the weapon is only one killer. As we see uncertainty was made magically become "certainty"!
The second assumption is fallacious that Meredith was overwhelmed by at least two people because his body did not show signs of active defense and because Meredith - practicing martial arts - it would be defense and could not easily succumb to a single attacker.
To me that is a consideration superficial and trivial, because a girl who weighs 50 kg if attacked by a person who weighs 80, armed, determined, and violent intruder, is blocked by terror, although he practiced martial arts for some time.
If and only if Meredith had been superesperta combat and self-defense and trained to danger and to the rule of fear, then the sentence would make sense ... but it was not! Badi who are master of karate and self-defense, top black belt, I teach self-defense to women and which are specialized in defense against the knife. "
And the staging of theft by Amanda and Raffaele, Time of death of Meredith connected to the false alibi of both the motive and what it says?
"Staging of theft by Amanda and Raffaele. The statement of the prosecution and judgments guilt-inducing "There has been a task of staging robbery organized by Amanda and Raffaele because Rudi Guede had no interest in it, so the two are guilty" does not hold up logically and scientifically, because there is no evidence that the alteration is the work of Amanda and Raffaele, because we are facing the error reverberation of "begging the question," that is, "are guilty only because they had interest in doing so."
I sincerely doubt that there was no impairment of the scene for detecting, I believe instead that Guede in the grip of an obsession compulsive (uncontrolled) and drugs have ransacked so illogical and disorganized. It is a typical behavior of individuals who mix burglary, robbery, libido, sex, blood and violence.
Time of death of Meredith and the false alibi of Knox and Sollecito. The time of the death of Meredith is fixed by the coroner of the Prosecutor to the 23 or so for reasons of arithmetic mean, but says it's from 21 hours to one hour. Here it is the glass half full or half empty ... but not seen in profile from the top (from above and you do not understand anything in such situations ... you lose your way ... you see all full regardless). The time of death is uncertain and lacking expertise with firm conclusions. The alibi of the two boys is not failed, the two say they were at Sollecito's house and nothing contradicts what!
The motive of the murder. According to the last sentence "the motive is of the loss of control, go over evil, the result of an erotic game of the group that went wrong: a group formed by Rudi Guede, Amanda and Raffaele ": this is a conjecture without foundation, because every judgment has suggested (without showing anything) motives in different situations with different behaviors and different roles.
In my opinion this is murder committed by Guede grounds autosicurezza, to silence the inconvenient witness (victim), for reasons of sadism and cruelty, to flow in a composition of the scene and the corpse by Meredith with duvet cover for matrix psychological reasons: remorse, denial psichicaa, final act of piety, then move on to the action of the mess mixing compulsive acts of modus operandi, matrix and psychological screening. "
But if Amanda is innocent because he has slandered Patrick Lumumba stating that the murderess was he?
"Amanda has put in between Lumumba because he was in the state of rat scary cornered, for the principle" mors tua vita mea ", because in psychological submissive and altered, alarm and total submission. Proved cowardly, selfish, illogical and incoherent, but there is nothing to suggest that it is a killer for the prosecution to Lumumba.
The questions "murder of Meredith" and "slander Lumumba" must not be connected with the relationship of cause or effect of sufficient reason, but must be viewed as two "pies" independent within the big mess-investigative-judicial proceedings. Slander in Lumumba is an example of collateral damage, the victim's path, dell'ignobile effect of "every man for himself" "!
She spoke and wrote of "deception structural" in the process? Can you explain?
"DECEPTION STRUCTURAL that mistake is the assumption of hidden, invisible, intangible, and cemented, which is formed and is formed by the invisible barrier that prevents the resolution of the case. It is the invisible core that contains in its intimacy secret errors, misrepresentations, the artifices and deception that allowed the truth to emerge. In this case was the fixing investigation that the murder had been committed by at least two people, and everything has been unconsciously adjusted and harmonized in this sense. Deception structural occurs when you come to the wrong conclusions because an invisible and brilliant false assumption inserted into the core regent of the fact / event that is being analyzed.
Deception structural, to become such, needs:
1. of a skilled director (the judiciary and the media for years that tightens around the Knox and Sollecito)
2. the false assumption well hidden and camouflaged (at least two killers),
3. the exact reasoning based on two false assumption (the wounds inflicted by two knives, if the attacker was one Meredith would defense),
4. false conclusions following the exact reasoning but based on false foundations places like axioms (the competition of two unknown subjects with Rudi Guede)
5. Recipients of false conclusions that have the characteristics of share regardless due haste, be sure not to make mistakes, the presumption of being rulers and powerful, because it is produced from an authoritative source (the lower courts). "
I think that this article is the definitive description of why this injustice went on so long.
The author has my highest respect.
