• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Continuation Part 14: Amanda Knox/Raffaele Sollecito

Status
Not open for further replies.
Well, well, well, we've gone into extra innings, haven't we? I thought it was just a clerical function to confirm Noncini.
 
anglolawyer said:
It's a novel form of detective fiction, Doug. Take a set of 'facts' (ahem) and then arrange them into a story and publish! :) But with real victims.
Click to expand...

By the way, the court gives a 1 hour warning before announcing the verdict, so should be easy to know when its coming.
 
Dougm said:
Coming soon! Italian Courts, The Board Game!

Was it Amanda, in the kitchen, with her hands over her ears? Or Rudy, on the toilet, with his ipod? Have fun with your friends! There are endless combinations! But be careful! To win the game, you will have to successfully spin the "motive wheel". And if you're not careful, the ISC can annul your verdict, and send you back to square one!
Click to expand...

Is it laid out in a circle, and there's really no way the game ever has to end?
 
It was the same **** when Nencini veredict came out. I think they're just discussing wether to reduce Amanda's sentence by 3 months or not, as requested by the prosecutor.
 
No one has a Monopoly on board games

Dougm said:
Coming soon! Italian Courts, The Board Game!

Was it Amanda, in the kitchen, with her hands over her ears? Or Rudy, on the toilet, with his ipod? Have fun with your friends! There are endless combinations! But be careful! To win the game, you will have to successfully spin the "motive wheel". And if you're not careful, the ISC can annul your verdict, and send you back to square one!
Click to expand...
There was an Amanda Knox Board Game. However, I think it was intended as a piece of art.
 
PMF.org appears to have locked guests out of the forum.

Some of them were getting very emotional before, almost begging for confirmation.
 
With the hundreds of appeal docs from both defence counsel have this ISC panel had sight of them before proceedings started on Wednesday?
 
MDDVS said:
It was the same **** when Nencini veredict came out. I think they're just discussing wether to reduce Amanda's sentence by 3 months or not, as requested by the prosecutor.
Click to expand...

It's the same as last time the ISC ruled (Chieffi). But, that court overruled the lower court.
 
Well, it is 7 pm there right now. I have to wonder about the average time it takes the ISC to render a decision? Is this an inordinate amount of time for deliberations or average? Also, how long has it been since the began their deliberations?
 
acbytesla said:
Well, it is 7 pm there right now. I have to wonder about the average time it takes the ISC to render a decision? Is this an inordinate amount of time for deliberations or average? Also, how long has it been since the began their deliberations?
Click to expand...

..and we are still waiting for the one hour countdown the court said they would give.
 
acbytesla said:
Well, it is 7 pm there right now. I have to wonder about the average time it takes the ISC to render a decision? Is this an inordinate amount of time for deliberations or average? Also, how long has it been since the began their deliberations?
Click to expand...

Do the judges get paid for overtime?
 
It's really weird. My experience of appeals is the judges have usually made their minds up already. It's just possible they might be swayed by oral submissions but it's mostly pretty clear which way the wind is blowing. They might have a few points they want cleared up in their own minds but not in a game-changing way. So what the heck are they doing?
 
anglolawyer said:
It's really weird. My experience of appeals is the judges have usually made their minds up already. It's just possible they might be swayed by oral submissions but it's mostly pretty clear which way the wind is blowing. They might have a few points they want cleared up in their own minds but not in a game-changing way. So what the heck are they doing?
Click to expand...

Maybe they are at the start of an overnight interrogation by police.

We'll find out tomorrow what they have confessed to.
 
anglolawyer said:
It's really weird. My experience of appeals is the judges have usually made their minds up already. It's just possible they might be swayed by oral submissions but it's mostly pretty clear which way the wind is blowing. They might have a few points they want cleared up in their own minds but not in a game-changing way. So what the heck are they doing?
Click to expand...

There was a lot of delay before the Hellmann verdict also. Not saying there is any equivalence, but I had the impression it was less around what the decision was, but how it was to be presented, and how to control events after. Maybe they are quibbling over wording in the announcement?

:confused:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom