• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Split Thread Criticisms of 9/11 Commission Report

Jango said:
How so? Any clue? More gibberish? I will say though, I surely hope to meet you one day in person :D
Edited by Agatha: 
Edited to remove moderated content
Click to expand...

Yes, your post was gibberish. You have no clue what Kennedy meant, quote mining him to support, you said it best, gibberish.


Kennedy was referring to Soviet Communism. His speech about press freedom during the cold war. He was making a case for self-censorship by the press...

This speech is used by CTers to make up BS about the NWO, Illuminati and other BS plots. http://www.jfklibrary.org/Research/...ewspaper-Publishers-Association_19610427.aspx
They use it with no reguard for the real subject, context, or events of the day. Big fail
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jango said:
Funny how that works out. Whenever I say something, the burden is on me. Whenever your crew, including the government, says something, the burden is on me.
Click to expand...

This happens because one side has presented evidence, and the other has not.

Guess which one you are on.
 
Nonpareil said:
This happens because one side has presented evidence, and the other has not.

Guess which one you are on.
Click to expand...

What evidence have they presented? Just the stuff they want to show you. Do they ignore or disregard evidence that makes them look bad? Yes.

In regards to the debunking of the video, where's that at?

You can keep your side.
 
Jango said:
What evidence have they presented? Just the stuff they want to show you. Do they ignore or disregard evidence that makes them look bad? Yes. ...
Click to expand...
Prove it.

Jango said:
In regards to the debunking of the video, where's that at? ...
Click to expand...
Why can't 911 truth support any claims in the video? Can you debunk it.

~ 0:26 the most sophisticated penetration of the most heavily-defended airspace in the world,
Click to expand...
What does it mean? Nothing, except it implies the 19 terrorists can't do what they did; is it a racists statement, and anti-arab statement; what good is it? Why can't you defend the video?
The video says this; it is a stupid statement. The terrorists killed their way to the cockpit, and faked a hijacking. There is no heavily-defended airspace over the USA, we don't have armed patrols, or missile sites. The video is complete BS.

The only thing it gets right is the date, and 19 terrorists - ironically making fun of 911, yet showing the 19 terrorists who did 911. Why can't you debunk the video?

I clearly said the Kennedy quote, is your quote mine error for the post.
Jango said:
No explanation therefore no quote mine. Thanks for admitting that.
Click to expand...
Kennedy quote... it is your quote mine - used to support who knows what; the post made no sense.
You quote mined Kennedy, and did not realize what he was talking about.
 
Last edited:
How are you getting on Jango, have you convinced anyone other than yourself ?
 
Jango said:
Kind of like the idealistic drones who have posted thousands-and-thousands of times in the conspiracy theory section without believing in a single conspiracy theory. Very productive indeed when the very though won't ever be contemplated. People here act like they'll die or something. But you're right, I'm to blame here, of course :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

1. I think you meant to say 'while questioning the veracity of many conspiracy theories and constantly asking for, and evaluating, evidence'. I guess you were short of time.
2. Please don't try to play the victim. It's perfectly reasonable to ask for clarification and evidence. That's what this forum is for. You still haven't told me what it is you gain from posting here. You don't want to convince, you don't believe you can change anything, you don't want responses to your posts, but you also don't want to be ignored.
 
Jango said:
Well, isn't that convenient...;)
Click to expand...

Convenience has nothing to do with it. You're entire argument up to this point has been that the entire government is evil therefore......Inside Job. You now concede there are different shades of good within levels of government.

As I said, if at this point you cannot understand how this eliminates your only argument, no further explanation will be beneficial to you.
 
cantonear1968 said:
Convenience has nothing to do with it. You're entire argument up to this point has been that the entire government is evil therefore......Inside Job. You now concede there are different shades of good within levels of government.

As I said, if at this point you cannot understand how this eliminates your only argument, no further explanation will be beneficial to you.
Click to expand...

No, I have not made that argument.
 
Jango said:
282 posts in that thread but not one of them debunked the entirety of the video. Why did you link to that? There's no debunking of the video, cat calls like the ones in this thread.

I'll be more specific: is there a comprehensive debunking of this video and all of its claims?

"It's stupid" or "LOL Truthers!" isn't debunking FYI.
Click to expand...

The video is BS; please pick a claim and support it with some evidence. You can't do it.

You can't explain Kennedy's quote you used to support the BS you posted.

Two can't, you can't support the silly video, you can't explain the quote.
Usually the NWO is at baseball games, and last week basketball, when do 911 truth get time off? all the time.

Go ahead pick a claim in the video? You can skip the fact they got who did it right, and then playing the cave card. Yes, they did hid in "caves", more like places where they could store stuff, and hide out on the move. What was the point of the video?

Pick a claim, come one you can do it. You miss the point; the video starts with 2.3 trillion dollars missing, that is a lie. Why would you watch a video which lies at zero time. Then it BS about Hani can't fly, yet we have the FDR, it has Hani flying and crashing into the Pentagon. And the FDR confirms Hani was a poor pilot, but he flew the jet into the Pentagon. In addition, the chief instructor agrees, Hani could fly a jet and crash into the Pentagon, his opinion. Yet 911 truth does like you, they read for BS and quote mine BS quotes about Hani, with the BS conclusion it can't be Hani. The entire video gets 911 truth followers to say BS. I thing the video was making fun of 911 truth; with a big lie at the beginning, how can it get better? What was the conclusion.

The conclusion is 911 truth's tag line. "Ignorance is Strength", what all 911 truth is based on, ignorance. They use BS like smoke moving to imply BS, and love to lie and quote mine.

So pick a claim, and support it; else, the video is BS.
 
Last edited:
Jango said:
282 posts in that thread but not one of them debunked the entirety of the video.
Click to expand...


This is because the video is so stupid it doesn't merit a response from learned folk.

Why not try debunking it yourself, it'd be a good exercise for your critical thinking skills.
 
beachnut said:
The video is BS; please pick a claim and support it with some evidence. You can't do it.

You can't explain Kennedy's quote you used to support the BS you posted.

Two can't, you can't support the silly video, you can't explain the quote.
Usually the NWO is at baseball games, and last week basketball, when do 911 truth get time off? all the time.

Go ahead pick a claim in the video? You can skip the fact they got who did it right, and then playing the cave card. Yes, they did hid in "caves", more like places where they could store stuff, and hide out on the move. What was the point of the video?

Pick a claim, come one you can do it. You miss the point; the video starts with 2.3 trillion dollars missing, that is a lie. Why would you watch a video which lies at zero time. Then it BS about Hani can't fly, yet we have the FDR, it has Hani flying and crashing into the Pentagon. And the FDR confirms Hani was a poor pilot, but he flew the jet into the Pentagon. In addition, the chief instructor agrees, Hani could fly a jet and crash into the Pentagon, his opinion. Yet 911 truth does like you, they read for BS and quote mine BS quotes about Hani, with the BS conclusion it can't be Hani. The entire video gets 911 truth followers to say BS. I thing the video was making fun of 911 truth; with a big lie at the beginning, how can it get better? What was the conclusion.

The conclusion is 911 truth's tag line. "Ignorance is Strength", what all 911 truth is based on, ignorance. They use BS like smoke moving to imply BS, and love to lie and quote mine.

So pick a claim, and support it; else, the video is BS.
Click to expand...

You said it has been debunked. You moan like a whore when people don't snap to attention when you demand it (the commissioned officer's mentality, no less) but you yourself make claims and don't bother explaining them nor proving them, which in the real-world is called hypocrisy. Debunk the video already and its claims. You apparently want to educate me, so by all means, do it already.
 
Jango said:
You said it has been debunked. You moan like a whore when people don't snap to attention when you demand it (the commissioned officer's mentality, no less) but you yourself make claims and don't bother explaining them nor proving them, which in the real-world is called hypocrisy. Debunk the video already and its claims. You apparently want to educate me, so by all means, do it already.
Click to expand...
Which claim needs debunking? Cat got your typing fingers//

Do you can't support the video? The video is more like a presentation of evidence for the official story; in a mocking tone. The video explains a passport was found, and it was. Passport survived the aircraft impacts at the WTC. Small objects are found in aircraft crashes, a fact, reality. The tone of the video is mocking reality. No big deal. 1:25 - are you saying a passport can't be found? Is that an anomaly.

You can't debunk the video, it is BS; unless you are armed with the logic and knowledge; you can't figure out your smoke anomaly is due to Flight 175's impact, you will not be able to debunk or discuss the video - as you keep proving, by avoiding it.

You make claims by quote mining Kennedy, and have no idea what Kennedy was talking about. It follows you can't debunk the video or pick items to discuss. When will you debunk your smoke anomaly, or will you stick with the BS.

Have you figure out the Kennedy quote yet? The smoke?
 
Last edited:
Jango said:
What evidence have they presented?
Click to expand...

There are plenty of threads on this site going over exactly that. I am not here to spoon-feed you.

Just the stuff they want to show you. Do they ignore or disregard evidence that makes them look bad? Yes.
Click to expand...

Ah, the "they're hiding something" defense. Wonderful.

Where is your evidence that anything that changes the facts is being hidden?

In regards to the debunking of the video, where's that at?
Click to expand...

Rather far along, really. But you...

Jango said:
282 posts in that thread but not one of them debunked the entirety of the video.
Click to expand...

...prefer to play silly games and demand a play-by-play, and dismiss out of hand anything that doesn't meet your perfect criteria. You then pretend you have made some sort of point.

You are the equivalent of annnnoid and his constant claims that, since no one has sat down and gone through every single claim of the existence of ESP and conclusively proven that they are all liars, the existence of ESP takes "subjective evidentiary primacy" and must be considered a rational position to take.

The core objections in the video have been shown to be bunk. No one cares to go further, because it's a waste of time. The conclusions drawn have already been shown to be nonsense.

There's no clock to run out, Jango. And we are an extremely bored and obsessive people. You will be hounded on this for years, if that is what you wish.
 
beachnut said:
Do you can't support the video? The video is more like a presentation of evidence for the official story. The video explains a passport was found, and it was. Passport survived the aircraft impacts at the WTC. Small objects are found in aircraft crashes, a fact, reality. The tone of the video is mocking reality. No big deal. 1:25 - are you saying a passport can't be found?

You can't debunk the video, you are not armed with the logic and knowledge; you can't figure out your smoke anomaly is due to Flight 175's impact, you will not be able to debunk or discuss the video - as you keep proving by avoiding it.

You can't debunk the video, so you don't. You make claims by quote mining Kennedy, and have no idea what Kennedy was talking about. It follows you can't debunk the video or pick items to discuss. When will you debunk your smoke anomaly, or will you stick with the BS/
Click to expand...

You're set on repeat, aren't you? Either debunk the video, as you have said you can, or get over it and move on. Simple. But, let's see you rehash your last ten posts again in response to this.
 
Nonpareil said:
There are plenty of threads on this site going over exactly that. I am not here to spoon-feed you.
Ah, the "they're hiding something" defense. Wonderful.

Where is your evidence that anything that changes the facts is being hidden?
Rather far along, really. But you...



...prefer to play silly games and demand a play-by-play, and dismiss out of hand anything that doesn't meet your perfect criteria. You then pretend you have made some sort of point.

You are the equivalent of annnnoid and his constant claims that, since no one has sat down and gone through every single claim of the existence of ESP and conclusively proven that they are all liars, the existence of ESP takes "subjective evidentiary primacy" and must be considered a rational position to take.

The core objections in the video have been shown to be bunk. No one cares to go further, because it's a waste of time. The conclusions drawn have already been shown to be nonsense.

There's no clock to run out, Jango. And we are an extremely bored and obsessive people. You will be hounded on this for years, if that is what you wish.
Click to expand...

1. But yous expect me to do that for yous.

2. They are hiding stuff. That's why there's such a thing as classified information. Information that is hidden from the public eye.

3. What a stupid question. "I must have complete answers or I won't budge!" :rolleyes:

4. Then don't say the entire video has been debunked.

5. Oh, you mean like yous? Yous do the very same thing. "I must have irrefutable evidence or I won't even consider it!"
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom