Harrit sues paper for defamation

beachnut said:
It is sad 911 truth fools people into doubt and joining up. Maybe those who fell for the BS could help the fence sitters figure out why they were fooled by the dignified lies of Gage and 911 truth. What is unfortunate, is people mistaking unsupported opinions for facts and evidence, and being on the fence due to belief in BS.

It is clear Gage and Harrit are frauds; sad to see people fooled by liars like Harrit. ... if they are not liars, they are delusional fools.
Click to expand...

Foolish frauds is more Likely, they have convinced themselves that they are right and their egos will not allow them to admit they are wrong.

They may have found by chance one energetic aluminum fueled chip I doubt it but it is possible just like the microspheres were friction wear particles, an energetic chip could have been created similarly, if Jones an Harriet actually tested and found an energetic chip, that was thermitic and ignited it prior to the paper then they could have been fooled into believing more chips were thermitic.
Leading to an embarrassing paper of foolishness.
If he presents evidence in court on structure of the ,Chips bet you it will be cutting dust residue
And that is why he wants to present his case he doesn't understand what he found.
A truther called you friendly when he found out I had participated in the mico spheres
Debate gave me a copy of what he claims was a personal email exchange between himself and Harrit, it was a description of cutting disk residue from Silicon Carbide aluminum oxide cutting disks with expoxy binder with paint.
 
Crazy Chainsaw said:
Foolish frauds is more Likely, they have convinced themselves that they are right and their egos will not allow them to admit they are wrong.

They may have found by chance one energetic aluminum fueled chip I doubt it but it is possible just like the microspheres were friction wear particles, an energetic chip could have been created similarly, if Jones an Harriet actually tested and found an energetic chip, that was thermitic and ignited it prior to the paper then they could have been fooled into believing more chips were thermitic.
Leading to an embarrassing paper of foolishness.
If he presents evidence in court on structure of the ,Chips bet you it will be cutting dust residue
And that is why he wants to present his case he doesn't understand what he found.
A truther called you friendly when he found out I had participated in the mico spheres
Debate gave me a copy of what he claims was a personal email exchange between himself and Harrit, it was a description of cutting disk residue from Silicon Carbide aluminum oxide cutting disks with expoxy binder with paint.
Click to expand...

He must have the "high-tech nano-thermitic material" to compare against his red grey chips. Let's hope he hasn't failed to disclose this information to the court. ;)
 
Spanx said:
Wonderfull, Neills will be appearing before three high court judges to prove he is not a crack pot, armed with a Video (YouTube ?) of the collapse of Wtc 7 and a bag of dust.

I'm looking forward to this.
Click to expand...

Oh no, he is going all in and doing a complete "Scientific" presentation, that is going to prove with out a doubt that 9/11 was an inside job.

The problem is that Harrit do not understand that it is him being called a crackpot thats on trail, not evidens for or against 9/11 being an inside job, so by starting a "Scientific" presentation of any sort would probably label him as a crackpot by most judges.

Harrit is using the Court room as a stage.
 
Josarhus said:
Oh no, he is going all in and doing a complete "Scientific" presentation, that is going to prove with out a doubt that 9/11 was an inside job.

The problem is that Harrit do not understand that it is him being called a crackpot thats on trail, not evidens for or against 9/11 being an inside job, so by starting a "Scientific" presentation of any sort would probably label him as a crackpot by most judges.

Harrit is using the Court room as a stage.
Click to expand...

He must have already presented this evidence to the judges in the exchange of statements ? If he hasn't it should not be used.;)
 
The judges are not going to even listen to any of this. The only thing they will hear is evidence being called a "crackpot" hurt his reputation. To win this, he has to show his reputation was hurt by this comment and this comment alone.
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
The judges are not going to even listen to any of this. The only thing they will hear is evidence being called a "crackpot" hurt his reputation. To win this, he has to show his reputation was hurt by this comment and this comment alone.
Click to expand...
We had something very similar here, with a trial about the harm to the reputation of a guy called Pedro Amorós caused by an article written by a reporter, related to the "faces of Bélmez". The trial focused on the authenticity of the faces, rather than on the harm to Amorós' reputation.

He lost, of course. The trial was a joke.
 
AE911T are fundraising to "pay Harrit's legal fees" / "show WTC7 video in court" depending on which spin they put on it.

From the first link:

"Dr. Harrit will also call two witnesses. One, Jan Utzon, is a world-renowned architect and AE911Truth petition signer who testified previously. The other, Dr. Per Hedegård, is a physics professor from the University of Copenhagan’s Niels Bohr Institute. His statement to a newspaper in 2010 dismissing Dr. Harrit was the only evidence used by Villemoes at trial. Today, Dr. Hedegård has completely reversed his position and insists on testifying in support of Dr. Harrit!"

Anyone know anything about this Dr Hedegård?
 
What relevance does Jan Utzon's testimony have in this trial? He's not an expert in chemistry and probably not in structural engineering which has nothing to do with Harrit's work.
 
JSanderO said:
What relevance does Jan Utzon's testimony have in this trial? He's not an expert in chemistry and probably not in structural engineering which has nothing to do with Harrit's work.
Click to expand...
To allow Harrit to namecheck him when cashing in donations. I doubt Utzon has anything intelligent to add to the court records, given that his public statements so far consisted entirely of JAQ'ing off.
 
Orphia Nay said:
AE911T are fundraising to "pay Harrit's legal fees" / "show WTC7 video in court" depending on which spin they put on it.
...
Click to expand...

From the first link, a newsletter dated February 26, 2015:
And so we are asking you to make a modest donation to Niels Harrit’s legal fund, and help raise us $15,000 by next week!
Click to expand...

Two days later, another newsletter: http://us1.campaign-archive1.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=604273b8d0
Already, we’ve raised $12,000 of the $15,000 needed to cover his legal fees.
Click to expand...

And then yesterday, March 05: http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=d03bf3ffcac549c7dc7888ef5&id=419e604a6d
Fundraising Goal Reached!

A Thank You Message from Dr. Niels Harrit
[...snipped bla bla bla...]
Onward to the Danish High Court!

Niels Harrit
Click to expand...
 
Half a league half a league,
Half a league onward,
All in the valley of Death
Rode Neils Harrit:
'Forward, the Light Brigade!
Charge for the guns' he said:
Into the valley of Death
Rode Neils Harrit.
 
It's no surprise that Harrit will be touting out all these irrelevant circus acts (the 7WTC video, Jan Utzon, Dr. Hedegård), given that he still haven't obtained legal representation.

The court list shows a 9.30 am start and it appears it's the only case heard on the day in the 6th chamber.
 
KDLarsen said:
It's no surprise that Harrit will be touting out all these irrelevant circus acts (the 7WTC video, Jan Utzon, Dr. Hedegård), given that he still haven't obtained legal representation.

The court list shows a 9.30 am start and it appears it's the only case heard on the day in the 6th chamber.
Click to expand...

Can not wait to see him laughed out of court, insane theories only come from insane or insanely incompetent people.
 
JayUtah said:
It will be interesting to see whether Danish courts have the same notions of relevancy as American courts.
Click to expand...
Given that Utzon was called as witness in the first case, I guess they'll allow the witnesses to utter their incredulity.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom