Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sorry but I really don't see any way we can have a conversation about Boone that can go anywhere. If you don't even know Boone could easily recognize a bear, further reading on the man is required on your part.
Chris B.

And I'd suggest that further reading is required on your part with regards to studying the many long lists available on Google of hunters mistaking various ridiculous things as other various ridiculous things. There's many examples of other fellow hunters being mistaken for a turkey, a moose, even bears...Fascinating stuff. But hey, Boone would've KNOWN, right? And in turn, you just KNOW he would've KNOWN, as evidenced with your...erm...proof? lol.
 
Then where's the "implication" for the "lots of pics" part?
Chris B.

"So there's lot's of pics and a HD video?"

You implied there were a lot of pics and a HD video. I'm not sure if you even know what HD is, nor do I think you understand what an implication is, either. Can't say I'm too surprised, mate.
 

From my quoted post:

"So there's lots of pics and a HD video. Hmm. Have you ever seen the Patterson/Gimlin film? Chris B"

You highlighted "a HD video" from my first sentence and also "the Patterson/Gimlin film" from my question.

If you say it is an implication/association of one to the other, then where in my question is the implication/association from "lots of pics"?

Seems to me it would be missing.

Please don't get into splitting hairs, you're an intelligent person and it's beneath your ability. We can go there as I have the time to kill but it's really kinda useless to do so. The thing is, try not to read between the lines. What I type, is really what I mean, no kidding.


And I'd suggest that further reading is required on your part with regards to studying the many long lists available on Google of hunters mistaking various ridiculous things as other various ridiculous things. There's many examples of other fellow hunters being mistaken for a turkey, a moose, even bears...Fascinating stuff. But hey, Boone would've KNOWN, right? And in turn, you just KNOW he would've KNOWN, as evidenced with your...erm...proof? lol.

Yes, Boone would have known a bear and yes, according to my own research I feel strongly in that opinion. What you're doing is demonstrating a flaw but it's likely not the one you're hoping for. Chris B.
 
"So there's lot's of pics and a HD video?"

You implied there were a lot of pics and a HD video. I'm not sure if you even know what HD is, nor do I think you understand what an implication is, either. Can't say I'm too surprised, mate.

I don't think you even know who said what. Chris B.
 
No one knows what is actually shown on the PGF. It's not really even useful as far as bigfoot discussions. It's just a documentary clip made by Roger Patterson and Al Deatley to promote bigfoot.

It's not comparable to the evidence provided for the plane wreck at all.

We know that Chris's HD video of bigfoot at 15 foot range has got to outshine the PGF. That would be comparable.
 
Please don't get into splitting hairs . . .
Okay, let's not. Let's say that sometimes lost planes and ships get found in the most unlikely places. Sometimes people make conclusions based on what seemed like good evidence at the time.

But no one anywhere has ever produced any bigfoot, or piece of bigfoot, or physical evidence (provisionally) confirming bigfoot. Lots of hoaxes though. Lots more than say, discovering crashed planes in the mountains.

There.
 
Last edited:
I'm sorry but I really don't see any way we can have a conversation about Boone that can go anywhere. If you don't even know Boone could easily recognize a bear, further reading on the man is required on your part.
Chris B.

We're not attempting to have a conversation about Boone, and you know that. This was an embarrassingly poor attempt by you to avoid the actual point.
 
I can judge who's female and who's male because I get to see the creatures up very close at times and they have very different "features" between the male and female. My thoughts about this one being a female come from the shape of the head,face and oh yeas, the breasts.

http://cryptozoologythetruth.blogspot.com/2010/05/is-this-bigfoot-in-kentucky.html

What an amazing bigfoot hunter. Sees them up close, has close up HD video. Lives on a bigfoot gathering area and trackway. Wow.

You'd think he'd produce the evidence he says he has, and get the creatures on the scientific map so they will be protected.

Alas, no. He always has some reason not to do anything that would help.
 
This thread is an example of the pay off to a Bigfoot Blaarger.

He is pretending to believe in Bigfoot, practicing his skills at frustrating skeptics.

The fact that he is getting responses from you, tells me he is doing it right.
This was my point a few pages ago. If it's a game, Chris certainly isn't playing alone.
 
Chris, what does your wife and co-workers think about your bigfoot interest? I'm curious how often you actually get out in the woods each year also. (probably less than myself) But somehow, these bigfoots are showing themselves to you. You're special chris!! (but i don't mean that in the good way haha)

What is your reasoning for hiding your HD closeup video again? (voices can be easily removed, and video can be easily edited to remove family members) You lack the skills to do this? (ask me, i'll help if that is the problem) Or perhaps this video is just hogwash? (my bet is this - ENDLESS EXCUSE TRAIN anything but actually producing the video!!! at ALL COSTS!!! LMAO)
 
Last edited:
http://cryptozoologythetruth.blogspot.com/2010/05/is-this-bigfoot-in-kentucky.html

What an amazing bigfoot hunter. Sees them up close, has close up HD video. Lives on a bigfoot gathering area and trackway. Wow.

You'd think he'd produce the evidence he says he has, and get the creatures on the scientific map so they will be protected.

Alas, no. He always has some reason not to do anything that would help.

He also claimed that his split-second "sighting" was enough for him to determine the fakes from the real thing, just by looking at a picture or brief video of a "Bigfoot." Not to mention the fact that he said he could tell a lot of fake prints from the real ones, and also could determine a lot of info on foot morphology based solely on him seeing a few "genuine Bigfoot tracks."
 
I would think your Bigfoot research is similar to your T-Rex research. Both seem to be photoshop or similar works.

About your earlier work, your T-Rex actually matches exactly with early Toyo pics of Godzilla, and not those of a T-rex. So if you're gonna start hoaxing, you'll need to do a better background on your subject pics for your photoshop.

1. I never said it was a T-rex.
2. So, how can you eliminate the possibility that by sheer chance the living breathing green reptilian-like cryptid I presented looks very like a Kaiju costume? Because you know, following the very same criteria, since Patty looks a lot like not few gorilla costumes...
3. Are you actually sure the living breathing green reptilian-like cryptid I presented looks like an "early Toyo Godzilla"?
4. You have my word they are not Photoshop jobs. I will not provide coordinates of my research area neither more detailed accounts on my research because I want to keep it pristine, free of interlopers that may disrupt my research or place themselves in to harms' ways. I don't want any risk to these creatures or to any bystanders. My reports must be enough for you.
5. Why are you not taking in to account my phantom panther pic?
6. My pictures have much more detail than the stuff you showed. I showed mine, now its time to show yours.
 
Here's some recent "evidence" that NL posted on BFF

"There wasn't anything left except for the skull and hind legs. As you can see in my picture, both legs were broken with spiral fractures, which requires torque or twisting motion. Canines don't usually cause that type of damage. They splinter bones with downward pressure, not a twisting motion. Here is a closer look."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom