Latest Bigfoot "evidence"

Status
Not open for further replies.
The Shrike said:
Chris is really on his A-game tonight. In addition to the wet tissue-clad logic he displayed, there's this:

"Now this particular search utilized the combined resources of the US Government and even included SR-71 flyovers. Nothing found.
Chris B."

Do you see it? Not only does Chris skewer us skeptics with that post, but he gets to demonstrate that because HE has seen bigfoots on multiple occasions he outperforms the "combined resources of the US Government" including "SR-71 flyovers". Dang, he's GOOD!
Click to expand...
It has nothing to do with my sightings/observations of Bigfoot.
I was merely pointing out that with our current technology, we still don't find large things like planes on every occasion when one goes missing. We can't seem to locate missing people, even though we're certain those people existed before going into the woods and logically, they "wanted" to be found. So is it possible that the argument claiming we should have found Bigfoot by now with our technology is flawed? Logically, I think it is.

Now if there was a record of finding every missing person and every downed plane with our technology, the argument would be closer to being valid. But, planes are still missing and people still continue to disappear. So it's no surprise a thinking/reasoning creature that lives elusively can evade our technology. Chris B.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
"On October 16, 1972, United States House of Representatives Majority Leader Thomas Hale Boggs and United States Representative Nicholas J. Begich boarded an airplane in Anchorage en route to Juneau," read a few short paragraphs alongside photos of the congressmen. "The aircraft disappeared amidst turbulent conditions, and no trace of the men or the airplane was found." (The Washington Post)
Click to expand...

This does explain why we've never found any of the bigfoot that crashed airplanes in Alaska.
 
LTC8K6 said:
Missing planes don't wander the woods by the thousands, interacting with people.

If they did, they wouldn't be missing.

You cannot be serious with these arguments, Chris.
Click to expand...

Precisely, missing planes don't throw candy at campers. Missing people don't snap tree branches to make lean-to's.

Chris's flawed thinking is that missing people WANT to be found, but aren't, apparently...therefore, a Bigfoot that doesn't want to be found, won't.

Technology and expertise can't find downed planes and missing people, so they can't find Bigfoot, either.

Apparently, Bigfoot has never been found because he doesn't want to be, and yet he seems to go out of his way to interact with people like Chris, NL, and (insert name of the many hundreds of Squatch-Hunters here) on an almost daily basis.

He knocks on tree's to let you know he's about, he whoops and wails at the top of his lungs, and apparently, can't tell the difference between his own kind calling out to him, and some bloke from Kentucky calling out to him.

So there we have it. Bigfoot is a master of evasion, he's survived this long because he doesn't want to be found, and yet literally ALL of the "evidence" for Bigfoot would suggest that not only does he not seem to care if people find him, he actively encourages people to come and look, interact and communicate with him and his kind.

People who don't want to be found don't generally attract attention to themselves by knocking on tree's really loudly or signalling to random people in the woods by whooping and wailing, leaving footprints everywhere and returning whooping-calls to strangers.

Doesn't a Bigfoot ever send out a call, hear one back in return and think "wait, that's not Jeff, who the bloody hell is that?!" No, apparently they don't know their own mates from their mortal enemy: MAN!
 
Last edited:
ChrisBFRPKY said:
It has nothing to do with my sightings/observations of Bigfoot.
I was merely pointing out that with our current technology, we still don't find large things like planes on every occasion when one goes missing. We can't seem to locate missing people, even though we're certain those people existed before going into the woods and logically, they "wanted" to be found. So is it possible that the argument claiming we should have found Bigfoot by now with our technology is flawed? Logically, I think it is.

Now if there was a record of finding every missing person and every downed plane with our technology, the argument would be closer to being valid. But, planes are still missing and people still continue to disappear. So it's no surprise a thinking/reasoning creature that lives elusively can evade our technology. Chris B.
Click to expand...



I agree with you Chris. It's weird. But, you really should come around to to the truth. Dude... Predatorfoot. It's the only logical explanation. Think about it.
 
Oh... Again the missing planes = bigfoots are real stuff...

So... Do we have a living breeding population of missing airplanes in Alaska?
Available imagery of airplanes... Same quality of bigfoot imagery?
Bigfoots... Do they have tail numbers?
Bigfoots... They are like airplanes, right? Just like airplanes, including the missing ones, we know who made them, where they were made, who owns and owned them, who piloted them, planned routes...

There are solid pieces of evidence, I even dare to say proof, that airplanes are real. And now, what about bigfoots?
 
So much silly in the missing airplane canard. Here's one I don't think has been mentioned. The point of the analogy is that there are places so wild and rugged that big things can be forever lost there. In the vast mountain ranges of Alaska and the PNW, those places exist.

How many planes have been irretrievably lost in semi-rural Kentucky?
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
<crapsnip> So is it possible that the argument claiming we should have found Bigfoot by now with our technology is flawed? Logically, I think it is . . .

So it's no surprise a thinking/reasoning creature that lives elusively can evade our technology. Chris B.
Click to expand...

No, this isn't logic, it's pretend. You folks gave ole foo continent-wide distribution, from sea to shining sea, from tundra, to Everglades, to some second-growth moonshine holler in Kentuck. Big mistake, because you see, all animals (including the human animal) leave sign, and footie would be no different, leaving lots of it. Ooog and Uggg would have followed that sign and footie would've been dragged back to camp, there to be oooh-ed and ah-ed over. Then later, pallets of skins and such sent back to European capitals.

Elusive? Smart? Well-adapted to their environs? More so than the First Nations people that ran afoul of the invading white men with their slightly superior technology? That's vapid, stupid, not even worth telling around the fire. That you guys imagine footie twinkle-toeing around every bush for eons, just out of reach, is cartoonish. You had to be chuckling when you typed the post above.

BTW: There simply is no fitting analogy for the fantasy of an undiscovered 9-ft bipedal ape wandering around an environment as settled, modified and exploited as that of North America.
 
Last edited:
Chris, your missing plane = bigfoot would appear to be asking us to produce a specific bigfoot in a general location.

It's the equivalent of me telling you I carved my initials on a specific tree somewhere in British Columbia. Using whatever technology you wish, go find that tree.

RayG
 
Plane lost in Alaska found!

There we go. A helicopter found a plane that went missing in Alaska. As RayG says, unless you are asking why a particular individual Bigfoot cannot be found, then the argument fails. Downed planes can be found. Not all of them, of course, but some. No one here is asking for all, or even some, Bigfoots to be found. Just one will do. Any one.
 
The Shrike said:
So much silly in the missing airplane canard. Here's one I don't think has been mentioned. The point of the analogy is that there are places so wild and rugged that big things can be forever lost there. In the vast mountain ranges of Alaska and the PNW, those places exist.

How many planes have been irretrievably lost in semi-rural Kentucky?
Click to expand...
Heh.
 
Chris, instead of wasting your life making up nonsense about a creature you've never seen, maybe you could do something more productive like start an organization for people who are also suffering from bigfoot addiction. You clearly understand the temptations and rituals that go along with the lifestyle.
 
RayG said:
Chris, your missing plane = bigfoot would appear to be asking us to produce a specific bigfoot in a general location.

It's the equivalent of me telling you I carved my initials on a specific tree somewhere in British Columbia. Using whatever technology you wish, go find that tree.

RayG
Click to expand...

Not at all. And it's not limited to planes. Why can't we find missing people? Obviously our technology is limited as per the results. If our technology COULD find every missing person, I would agree it WOULD find Bigfoot as well. Until we reach the 100% recovery rate of those missing things we're looking for that we know to exist, it's a flawed argument. Chris B.
 
I'm not familiar with this particular line of nutjobbbery

Tiny planes fall into massive oceans and can't be found.
Therefore technology is rubbish.
That's why giant imaginary monkey men can't be found in little forests.

Do I have that right?
 
The Shrike said:
So much silly in the missing airplane canard. Here's one I don't think has been mentioned. The point of the analogy is that there are places so wild and rugged that big things can be forever lost there. In the vast mountain ranges of Alaska and the PNW, those places exist.

How many planes have been irretrievably lost in semi-rural Kentucky?
Click to expand...


The footers are prepared to defend the faith beyond technology. Soon enough we will have the technology to theoretically find "every" missing person. The footers excuses will migrate to "it must be extinct now" and the pointing at "science" and lack of action and money is to blame for this fine creatures demise. <<< you can bet on it.
 
ChrisBFRPKY said:
Not at all. And it's not limited to planes. Why can't we find missing people? Obviously our technology is limited as per the results. If our technology COULD find every missing person, I would agree it WOULD find Bigfoot as well. Until we reach the 100% recovery rate of those missing things we're looking for that we know to exist, it's a flawed argument. Chris B.
Click to expand...

Plenty of missing persons are found. Bigfoot? Never.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom