timhau
NWO Litter Technician
Or that Putin denied having Russian troops in the Crimea before the (rather Soviet) referendum and ten later admitted it?
I don't think he ever actually admitted it -- he just gave them medals for their service there.
Or that Putin denied having Russian troops in the Crimea before the (rather Soviet) referendum and ten later admitted it?
LOLlooks to miss entire sections that the German one doesn't - there are helpful gaps though:

I don't think he ever actually admitted it -- he just gave them medals for their service there.
Putin denied that the Russian-speaking soldiers occupying key Crimean military sites were Russian special forces, describing them as pro-Russian local self-defence forces.
"There are many military uniforms. Go into any local shop and you can find one," he said.
The armed men in military uniform without insignia, dubbed “the little green men” or “the polite people,” who were present in Crimea before and during the referendum there, were Russian troops, Vladimir Putin acknowledged speaking at a Q&A session with on Thursday. The president said he never concealed the fact from his foreign counterparts, and explained to them that it was the only way to ensure the referendum on the region’s status would be carried out peacefully.
I am not entirely sure about the impartiality of a website with a stated agenda of observing* "on an ongoing basis, Germany's renewed attempts to regain great power status in the economic, military and political arena."
I don't know about German, but the word, "hegemonic", especially in the phrase "hegemonic strategies and tactics" in English sounds like the an escape from a 1970's sociology department.
Personally, I am not that worried about a German Military** hegemony. It is particularly ironic, as one could regard Russia as aiming to restore its hegemony in the former USSR.
*"Observing" this avoids any question as to whether this is actually a policy.
**Being charitable, one might argue that the current EU economic policy might be aiming for an economic hegemony.

LOL, this is getting better and better. You dismiss a source for an early observation that turned out to be undeniably true and relevant to the later development (an extreme right-wing element in the Euromaidan movement, which by now turned into a militia with several thousand members acting with almost impunity) - because their main topic is something you admittedly "don't know about"? Are you still following even yourself?![]()
Wow. This is hilarious
And I have to repear that those endlessly ranting about the far right in the Ukraine are silent about the Far Right in Russia, which is much more powerful and influential then the Far Right in the Ukraine.
And I have to repear that those endlessly ranting about the far right in the Ukraine are silent about the Far Right in Russia, which is much more powerful and influential then the Far Right in the Ukraine.
Frankly, West should just provide/offer use of drones with nice packages like Hellfire missiles. (Only slightly different case then Yemen, IS,...)
Bolstering Ukraine’s defenses should not be a U.S.-only responsibility. NATO members should also increase their military assistance to Ukraine, with a view to meeting the priority needs identified above. NATO allies who have former Soviet/Warsaw Pact equipment and weapons systems similar to or compatible with those now operated by the Ukrainian military should consider contributing those to Kyiv’s defense capabilities.
Some in the West are concerned that provision of military assistance, particularly of lethal arms, would cause Russia to escalate the crisis. We vehemently disagree. Russia has already continuously escalated:
seizing and annexing Crimea, encouraging and aiding separatists in eastern Ukraine, providing the separatists with heavy arms, and ultimately invading the Donbas with regular Russian army units. Although NATO and Ukraine differ over whether Russian regular units have been withdrawn, there is no dispute that a significant number of Russian officers and a large amount of Russian military equipment remain in the Donbas. Enhanced military assistance would increase Kyiv’s capability to deter further Russian escalation.
Won’t such arms supplies further nourish a Russian paranoia of encirclement? Yes, but Putin is feeding the paranoia already, untroubled by the facts. He recently told students in St Petersburg that the Ukrainian army “is not an army, it is a foreign legion, in this case a Nato foreign legion”.
Europe does have leverage, if it chooses to use it. Russia may be a geopolitical giant but its GDP is no bigger than Italy’s. It is dependent on Europe’s financial structures. Yet next to the plunging oil price, the EU sanctions thus far have had a virtually symbolic impact. Cutting Russian banks and companies from the Belgium-based Swift international transaction system would, by contrast, impose a serious jolt. It could be done quickly, but then also rolled rapidly back. It has worked before, against Iran, which entered nuclear negotiations soon after being banned from Swift in 2012. Many businesses would balk at the costs. But these would surely be easier to bear than the enduring damage done by a widening war on the European continent.
Ukrainian forces are short of secure communications systems. The result is that their communications are both subject to jamming, and often also show their location to Russian direction-finding equipment. This can lead to being swiftly targeted by Russian artillery, including Grad and other, more powerful, rocket systems.
Now, in addition, Russia has the benefit of a live testing ground in eastern Ukraine, where it can try out its new weapons, systems and tactics. The results - especially if all of these are tested against any potential new US defensive systems supplied to Ukraine - will help Russia assess how its forces would fare in a direct confrontation with Nato.
Keir Giles is an analyst with the Conflict Studies Research Centre in Oxford, and an Associate Fellow with the Russia and Eurasia Programme at Chatham House in London.