bit_pattern
Unregistered
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2010
- Messages
- 7,406
More white people are pulled over while driving fancy cars than black people are
Have you got stats on this?
More white people are pulled over while driving fancy cars than black people are
All he did was ask me to unravel a balled up straw wrapper to prove that's what it was.
I know of at least two black students who were forced by police (in my nice little Californian college town) to prove ownership when they dared to open the trucks of their own (relatively new) cars. I know of no white student who was even questioned by the police in any way under equivalent circumstances. This paralleled similar circumstances where the two black students were repeatedly questioned by police when just walking to a restaurant in town, or approaching their own homes. I know of zero such situations with white students. Or white anybody. I would add that the black students dressed much better and more formally than I did.
No, two is not a statistically significance number, but I certainly would not dismiss any such claim as absurd use of the "race card." I feel (which I am allowed to do prior to an intellectual proof) that racial profiling by the police still persists, and in places you might never suspect.
I have been accosted by police while sitting in my car in broad daylight in a public parking lot, doing nothing suspicious, and asked to allow them to search my car and show my license and registration. I am white. The same thing has happened to at least two white friends of mine. I see no reason that this type of thing wouldn't happen to black people, too. Do you?
ETA: I live in California, so it's the same state as where you say your two black acquaintances were accosted, indicating even further that this type of thing is not uncommon. Of course, your black friends will walk around for the rest of their lives thinking that they were racially profiled, whereas I just walk around thinking that cops can be really annoying sometimes.
I've read writings from others in law enforcement about the testing that they undergo (don't have links handy); and they also tend to screen people who demonstrate too much flexibility in their thinking, which supposedly makes them less likely to obey orders, and more likely to question their superiors.
The cop suspected you were in the neighborhood to buy drugs, you admit you were there for that purpose, but that's not relevant?
Is this supposed to prove that black people are not profiled by police?
Two white men in a beat up car in a Hispanic neighborhood with a reputation for ongoing drug sales is not, for my money, racial profiling so much as proactive policing. You were there to buy drugs the cops knew that. Or at least thought they did. Cops pulling over a black accountant in a late model car going to see a client in a toney white neighborhood is racial profiling. Two young black men in a beat up van cruising a toney white neighborhood getting pulled over is not racial profiling. Most reasonable people see the difference. In addition to race there is also a class issue.Cop had no reason to suspect so other than based on race, so...no. No different from pulling a black person over in a white neighborhood under suspicion that he's there to commit burglary.*
I don't think anyone has argued or is arguing that there is no racial profiling beyond what happens to black people. In fact people -- Hispanics, Middle Easteners -- argue there is.No, it's supposed to back up eeyore1954's anecdote that there is racial profiling beyond what happens to black people.*
Have you got stats on this?
Seriously? I don't think you realize how small the black population in the US is, or you wouldn't be asking for stats to back up the notion that more whites are pulled over while driving fancy cars than blacks. There are hundreds of thousands, if not millions, more whites driving fancy cars than blacks. They get pulled over.
Of course, this could lead to a relatively pointless discussion as to just what, exactly, a "fancy" car is. The point is, mathematics and percentages guarantee that more whites are being swept up in traffic enforcement actions than blacks are, in their relatively tiny pockets of the country. The difference is, they don't cry racism when it happens. For the record, not all blacks do, either. Some of them seem to realize that driving a car and living in a society makes occasional encounters with the police a likely outcome, regardless of one's race.
As mentioned by newyorkguy, I find it interesting that you do not believe that there is racial profiling by the police when members of the police themselves see this as occurring.
I have seen no evidence presented indicating that black police officers are any less likely to see racism where it doesn't exist than black people in other occupations. I've seen police officers believe all kinds of stupid things. I don't see why it would be any less likely in this case, especially when it's clearly an existing phenomena for black people to imagine racism where it doesn't exist.
Ever heard of Christopher Dorner? An extreme case, but one that indicates police officers are not immune to incorrectly blaming racism for things happening to them that they don't like.
What evidence is there that they were racially profiled? I'm not seeing any.
I've lost count of how many times I've been told by non-white friends or acquaintances of how they were treated a certain way because of their race, only to later be confronted by incontrovertible evidence that their treatment had absolutely NOTHING to do with their race (one is example is when a Mexican co-worker was woefully lamenting the fact that a female customer had asked him to wash his hands before preparing a drink for her, all because he was Mexican, and it was so horrible that he had to deal with this constant prejudice. Later, the same female customer came in and asked ME to wash MY hands before I prepared a drink for her, proving that her request had NOTHING to do with race, and adding one more sample to the pool of evidence that vast numbers of people cry racism when none exists).
As for black people being pulled over while driving fancy cars, cry me a river. More white people are pulled over while driving fancy cars than black people are, but they don't get to blame it on their race. They actually have to accept responsibility for whatever they're actually being pulled over for, not whine about racism.
My standard question to any acquaintance claiming that they were pulled over for being black is, how did the police officer know that they were black before they were pulled over, as generally, police cars approach from behind. I have not once received a satisfactory answer.
Yes, it is POSSIBLE for a car to drive past a stationary police officer, and for the officer to see the driver was OH MY GOD, BLACK, and then swing into hot pursuit. However, this has never been the case in any of the stories I have heard. The black drivers being horrendously persecuted for "driving while black" have always been pulled over the way any other person is pulled over: on the street or highway, and signaled to stop by a police officer from behind.
I know of at least two black students who were forced by police (in my nice little Californian college town) to prove ownership when they dared to open the trucks of their own (relatively new) cars. I know of no white student who was even questioned by the police in any way under equivalent circumstances. This paralleled similar circumstances where the two black students were repeatedly questioned by police when just walking to a restaurant in town, or approaching their own homes. I know of zero such situations with white students. Or white anybody. I would add that the black students dressed much better and more formally than I did.
No, two is not a statistically significance number, but I certainly would not dismiss any such claim as absurd use of the "race card." I feel (which I am allowed to do prior to an intellectual proof) that racial profiling by the police still persists, and in places you might never suspect.