Daylightstar
Philosopher
...
Today model an atom is total wrong!
...
Why do you even appear to accept that atoms exist?
...
Today model an atom is total wrong!
...
What makes you accept that atoms exist, Pixie of key?
Only thing what really exist is movement!
Movement = energy
Movement = pushing force
Eternal Recycling working with movement which is pushing force.
EternalOne
Only thing what really exist is movement!
Movement = energy
Movement = pushing force
Eternal Recycling working with movement which is pushing force.
EternalOne
[qimg]http://i.imgur.com/uZOlttQ.jpg[/qimg]
I can say, because there is movement and i am right!
EternalMovement
Galileo: what happening for expanding space when is expandibg?
you: space metric grid grow.
Galileo: why that happening
you: because space expanding
Galileo: whatkind of science test you can makeeith expanding space
you: none, we just believe, space expanding
Galileo: ou ****, really, is this pseudoscience ir what?
EternalOne
Only thing what really exist is movement!
Movement = energy
Movement = pushing force
Eternal Recycling working with movement which is pushing force.
EternalOne
Galileo: what happening for expanding space when is expandibg?
you: space metric grid grow.
Galileo: why that happening
you: because space expanding
Galileo: whatkind of science test you can makeeith expanding space
you: none, we just believe, space expanding
Galileo: ou ****, really, is this pseudoscience ir what?
EternalOne
Movement of what? If what has moved doesn't "really exist" than neither can its movement.
Demonstrably false, even stationary objects have energy.
Also demonstrably false as even stationary objects can be under applied forces. Likewise a moving object need not be under any applied force for that movement. Also this directly contradicts your "Movement = energy" assertion above as the two combined would mean that energy = force which is dimensionally incorrect.
EternalNone
Lets try prove that there somewhere is stationary object, heh heh!
stationary object, heh heh!
lets tell me something about, what a **** is stationary object?
EternalMovement
Your utility to understand basic physics looks pretty intransigent.
Ah, we're back to Aristotle!Movement = pushing force
One of the fundamental propositions of Aristotelian philosophy is that there is no effect without a cause. Applied to moving bodies, this proposition dictates that there is no motion without a force. Speed, then is proportional to force and inversely proportional to resistance
http://www.batesville.k12.in.us/physics/phynet/mechanics/newton1/Aristotle.htmlBasically, Aristotle's view of motion is "it requires a force to make an object move in an unnatural" manner - or, more simply, "motion requires force".
After all, if you push a book, it moves. When you stop pushing, the book stops moving. (Not right away, of course, but, unless you push it, it gradually slows to a stop.) To keep a bicycle moving (on level ground) you have to keep pedaling. To keep a car moving, you have to keep the engine pushing it.
To most people, this is a very reasonable and "common sense" notion. There are only two problems with this idea:
It doesn't work, and
It isn't logical.
there is no stationary object anywhere and this is fact!
There is only movement / energy and nothing else!
EternalMovement
Yes, but where does all this movement (which necessitates a pushing force) in the universe come from? There has to be unmoved mover - God!
there is no stationary object anywhere and this is fact!
...
Ah, we're back to Aristotle!
ETA Here's a modern comment on Aristotle, designed for members of the public who have no particular scientific knowledge, so it's appropriate here. http://www.batesville.k12.in.us/physics/phynet/mechanics/newton1/Aristotle.html
Yes, but where does all this movement (which necessitates a pushing force) in the universe come from? There has to be unmoved mover - God!