• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

The Metaphysical Consciousness

bruto said:
In what sense, doronshadmi, will higher consciousness prevent thunder?
Click to expand...
Reality at its higher consciousness naturally expresses harmony among its components exactly as done in an healthy organism.

So thunders, supernovas etc. are not prevented if they are not block the development of reality's complexity.
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
Enlightenment is being like that dog, exactly because such a dog is quite simply what it is and fine with it as an harmonious phenomenon of reality.
Click to expand...
Bark.

Insult? What is exactly insult with the fact that you are using only about-knowledge of consciousness?
Click to expand...
Nothing.
You misunderstood my comment about a dog having Buddha nature and thought I was claiming that TM was Buddhism, and then from that derived that I "had no clue".
Instead, you simply misunderstood my comment.

You asked: "What is consciousness?", but you avoid direct-knowledge of it.

Why is that?
Click to expand...
I'm not avoiding anything.
I asked you for a definition of consciousness because I was interested in how you would answer that question.
It hadn't anything to do with myself. I wanted to know about your understanding, or lack thereof.

Concussion in its global sense is the result of the lack of harmony among relative phenomena, and the solution is direct-knowledge of consciousness during relative daily life.
Click to expand...
The phenomena that is now is the juxtaposition of the harmonious is that is only as it is invariantly variant through the energy of all that is the universe's propagation from the transcendent to produce the consciousness capable of achieving meta consciousness through its ability to synchronize with the invariance of the supersymmetry and restore coordinated singularity where it has only been so to produce the now that can emerge the is that can become the new which the universe came to be so to become, and this is only possible through disparate accesses of aspects of reality unifying by in-harmony through the waves of direct knowledge which the universe can only achieve through producing consciousness to experience the higher consciousness.

Do I get a bone now?
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
Reality at its higher consciousness naturally expresses harmony among its components exactly as done in an healthy organism.
Click to expand...
A single cell life lacking consciousness has more "harmony" than a multicellular life which has consciousness.

Oh right...particles have consciousness because the universe is consciousness...silly me.
 
doronshadmi said:
Reality at its higher consciousness naturally expresses harmony among its components exactly as done in an healthy organism.

So thunders, supernovas etc. are not prevented if they are not block the development of reality's complexity.
Click to expand...
But you have asserted that you did not mean to limit your discussion of concussion to the medical sense. Thunder is a concussion, and you have said that concussions will not occur in a harmonious world.
 
JaysonR said:
A single cell life lacking consciousness has more "harmony" than a multicellular life which has consciousness.

Oh right...particles have consciousness because the universe is consciousness...silly me.
Click to expand...

Nothing hes consciousness simply because reality is consciousness from 0 to infinity (where infinity at its absolute sense is unity (it is not multiplicity, as currently understood among traditional mathematicians)).
 
bruto said:
But you have asserted that you did not mean to limit your discussion of concussion to the medical sense. Thunder is a concussion, and you have said that concussions will not occur in a harmonious world.
Click to expand...

I refine what I have said. That how evolution works.
 
bruto said:
No, it is not.
Click to expand...

Yes it is, as follows:
doronshadmi said:
bruto said:
Not having a concussion is not one side of having a concussion any more than non-being is a kind of being.
Click to expand...
Not having a concussion (medical or not) is an evolutionary goal for harmonious reality, and you, bruto, whether you like it or not, are a participator of it.
Click to expand...
In this reply I was not clear enough about "Not having a concussion", and as a result one may understand that "Not having a concussion" = "Not having a concussion at all".

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10229326&postcount=1005 is an evolutionary refinement of what is written above such that "Not having a concussion" ≠ "Not having a concussion at all".
 
JaysonR said:
Nothing.
You misunderstood my comment about a dog having Buddha nature and thought I was claiming that TM was Buddhism, and then from that derived that I "had no clue".
Instead, you simply misunderstood my comment.
Click to expand...
In that case I apologize in front of you about my "you have no clue" since "dog having Buddha nature" is a beautiful analogy of direct-knowledge of consciousness. Yet, analogies are never the thing itself, which is direct-knowledge of consciousness, in this case.

JaysonR said:
I'm not avoiding anything.
I asked you for a definition of consciousness because I was interested in how you would answer that question.
It hadn't anything to do with myself. I wanted to know about your understanding, or lack thereof.
Click to expand...
Definition of consciousness is no more than about-consciousness expression, so the right answer is provided only by direct-knowledge of consciousness.

So I ask you again: Why do you avoid direct-knowledge of consciousness?

JaysonR said:
... which the universe can only achieve through producing consciousness to experience the higher consciousness.

Do I get a bone now?
Click to expand...
No, because nothing producing consciousness.

Again, reality is consciousness (http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10230502&postcount=1011).

The term "higher consciousness" means that also its absolute aspect is directly known.
 
Last edited:
doronshadmi said:
Yes it is, as follows:

In this reply I was not clear enough about "Not having a concussion", and as a result one may understand that "Not having a concussion" = "Not having a concussion at all".

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10229326&postcount=1005 is an evolutionary refinement of what is written above such that "Not having a concussion" ≠ "Not having a concussion at all".
Click to expand...

Utter nonsense. Does not does not equal does not? How handy to redefine evolution to mean that you can disavow sloppy language and mistakes and deflect criticism for them.
 
doronshadmi said:
Yes it is, as follows:

In this reply I was not clear enough about "Not having a concussion", and as a result one may understand that "Not having a concussion" = "Not having a concussion at all".

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showpost.php?p=10229326&postcount=1005 is an evolutionary refinement of what is written above such that "Not having a concussion" ≠ "Not having a concussion at all".
Click to expand...

Your posts are homeopathic and we have to dilute them and concuss them for them to make sense?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom