• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.
Status
Not open for further replies.
And we already know Wilson exerted unnecessary authority giving a rip about ordering the two young men out of the street.

I live on a residential street about the same width. It's even a arteriole with yellow reflectors in the middle. If anyone was walking in the street (and people do) I would NEVER expect a cop driving down the street to say a word, let alone order them to the side of the road.

I don't know the situation there but my wife has been harassed by young "thugs" who were walking in the middle of the street and would not get out of the way and while I was not verbally harassed I did receive a glare once when I slowly went around someone who did not move out of the way. Neither of us honked at them to move.
My guess would be people there have complained to the police about similar behavior.

ETA: Google walking in the middle of the street and you will see this is not an unheard of practice.
 
Last edited:
Check your notes. Wasn't thirty-five feet the distance Brown's body was from the police SUV?

Yes, isn't it clear, by even Wilson's "version" of the story (and which version are we on now?) that it was Wilson who went running after Brown, not Brown who came back at Wilson. Brown was killed 35' from the SUV. Wilson, exited his vehicle and made chase, and was (perhaps?) six feet from Brown when he shot him in the head. Great work for a guy with an orbital blowout.

Some of these "skeptics" are having trouble keeping up with the plot.
 
Jim Hoft’s Unsourced Claim That Officer Darren Wilson Had an “Orbital Blowout Fracture of the Eye Socket”


Interesting is this:I saw that it said U of Iowa earlier. I don't know if it's because I clicked on the AAPOS link or Hoft later scrubbed the image on his site.

I am unimpressed with that analysis. Witnesses have Officer Wilson being escorted away from the scene soon after the shooting by two police who show up minutes after the shooting, that may not be Wilson walking around but the two other police. The University of Iowa logo not being copied could mean any number of things (including nothing which should be the default assumption unless there's evidence otherwise) and as Charles Johnson's piece admits that site never said that was actually Officer Wilson's medical results.
 
You got that highlighted part right. That's the old police chief interview discussing the injury to Wilson's face. Nothing new and then they carefully report "as reported by Gateway Pundit" instead of claiming any attempted vetting of the claim.

Notice the attempt to conflate the "beaten severely" claim by an anonymous "insider" with the police chief's statement.

Jim Hoft’s Unsourced Claim That Officer Darren Wilson Had an “Orbital Blowout Fracture of the Eye Socket”


Interesting is this:I saw that it said U of Iowa earlier. I don't know if it's because I clicked on the AAPOS link or Hoft later scrubbed the image on his site.



Fox News is simply sponging a bit off the Gateway Pundit fakery. Chances are near certain Fox will suffer nothing in the long run for this false news report.

Ginger, the Fox News story quotes their own source. I don't see any mention of Gateway Pundit, and they clearly say the source was talking directly to foxnews.com.
 
Darren Wilson, the Ferguson, Mo., police officer whose fatal shooting of Michael Brown touched off more than a week of demonstrations, suffered severe facial injuries, including an orbital (eye socket) fracture, and was nearly beaten unconscious by Brown moments before firing his gun, a source close to the department's top brass told FoxNews.com.

That indicates a source talking to Fox News.
 
Ginger, the Fox News story quotes their own source. I don't see any mention of Gateway Pundit, and they clearly say the source was talking directly to foxnews.com.


I thought I was missing something. Gateway pundit is not mentioned in the Fox News article.
 
Still skeptical about the orbital injury story. You would think if there was anything to it every news outlet would be proclaiming it, except for a couple of sources who have a definent bias concerning this story.
 
Why in the world not? I know of one neighborhood where folks were intimidated by young people walking in the middle of the street, intimidating motorists and refusing to move. It's a pretty big deal in some places. Should a cop "say a word" if the kids refuse to move out of his car's way?
check out post 714
some discussion was devoted to this then.
 
I'm sure it is not PC, and I'm sure it will make heads explode, but it is interesting to consider what would have became of Michael Brown if he hadn't been killed in this incident. There are rumors that he was about to start classes for HVAC or something similar, but it seems very likely to me at least that he was on a path to more and more trouble with the law.

Can you explain why that might be interesting?

Even if we were all entirely certain that he was going to live a life a crime, how is that in any possible way relevant to the discussion of this shooting?
 
A couple of thoughts come to mind:

1) How do you know the witnesses claiming Brown was in the act of surrendering have not provided statements to the police? If they haven't, I would consider that gross incompetence on the part of the investigators. And assuming they have, would that make them that much more credible in your mind?

2) Shouldn't we wait until the witness statements are actually released until we judge their credence? I keep hearing about these witnesses who support Wilson's version of events, and I can't help but notice that I have yet to see what his version of events actually is, let alone the statements from witnesses who supposedly corroborate it.
Your first and second points contradict each other a little bit.

None of the witness statements have been released.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom