Desert Fox
Philosopher
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2014
- Messages
- 6,147
...led you to believe we were 'debating' ?
So you are openly admitting you are only here to Troll?
...led you to believe we were 'debating' ?
It was in their interest to convince themselves against the evidence, and they did, and still do.I may have been misunderstood.
I agree with everyone that miscarriages of justice can occur in the US, or anywhere.
But for the whole NATIONAL judiciary to circle the wagons to protect the hick town to protect NATIONAL Honor, as the Italian Judiciary has, is something that I do not see happening.
And if this case has shown anything, it has shown that the Italian Public is terrified of its own judiciary.
(...)
There were definitely WMD. There was definitely a link between Saddam and Al Qaeda. Saddam was definitely close to getting a nuke. And so on. All repeated publicly for months . . . there are still citizens who can't believe it was all a lie.
To be fair, the intent is not debate. The intent is to highlight in yellow one item in the post, and then make a smart remark about it.....
It's the highlighting in yellow which gives it away....
Nice observation. In fact, there are also citizens (Americans) who seem to believe Mignini put forward a ritualistic or Satanic scenario, counseld with psychic Carlizzi on the Narducci case, believe Preston delusion or think Spezi & C are innocent, that docters fabricated bogus HIV tests, that Italian media played by ahthorities disseminated lies against Knox in order to prejudice the trial, that Knox and Sollecits accounts had no contradictions, that Knox never attended a drug dealers ring, that Questura never writes documents in Comic SF, that Stefanoni lied and hid results, and that Conti and Vecchiotti are independent...
Nice observation. In fact, there are also citizens (Americans) who seem to believe Mignini put forward a ritualistic or Satanic scenario,
The murder, Il Tempo newspaper reported him telling the court, “was premeditated and was in addition a ‘rite’ celebrated on the occasion of the night of Hallowe’en. A sexual and sacrificial rite ... In the intention of the organisers, the rite should have occurred 24 hours earlier” – on Hallowe’en itself – “but on account of a dinner at the house of horrors, organised by Meredith and Amanda’s Italian flatmates, it was postponed for one day. The presumed assassins contented themselves with the evening of 1 November to perform their do-it-yourself rite, when for some hours it would again be the night of All Saints.”
counseld with psychic Carlizzi on the Narducci case,
believe Preston delusion
or think Spezi & C are innocent,
that docters fabricated bogus HIV tests,
that Italian media played by ahthorities disseminated lies against Knox in order to prejudice the trial,
that Knox and Sollecits accounts had no contradictions,
that Knox never attended a drug dealers ring,
that Questura never writes documents in Comic SF,
that Stefanoni lied and hid results,
and that Conti and Vecchiotti are independent...
Nice observation. In fact, there are also citizens (Americans) who seem to believe Mignini put forward a ritualistic or Satanic scenario,
counseld with psychic Carlizzi on the Narducci case, believe Preston delusion or think Spezi & C are innocent, that docters fabricated bogus HIV tests, that Italian media played by ahthorities disseminated lies against Knox in order to prejudice the trial, that Knox and Sollecits accounts had no contradictions, that Knox never attended a drug dealers ring, that Questura never writes documents in Comic SF, that Stefanoni lied and hid results, and that Conti and Vecchiotti are independent...
You're arguments are fraying at the edges. Spezi is innocent or have you forgot that his case was dismissed? Out of curiosity, how did they get a list of Amanda Knox's sexual partners? And show us the evidence that Knox attended a drug dealers ring? Or that Conti and Vechiotti are not independent.
I notice you have no problem with saying there is a conspiracy involving Hellmann and Conti and Vechiotti and everyone else.
I find it hard to believe that official documents have EVER been printed using the Microsoft COMIC SANS MS. Not exactly a dignified font for official government documents.
I love this font, because it is so informal. But this is the exact reason, they would never use it. But still it is possible, just change the font in Microsoft Office. But what makes that really impossible, is that they would use that font for the the official letterhead for the Questura di Perugia. Also it is interesting that while it is signed, the names are not printed below the
signatures.
The fax that is banging around Twitter is the one Machiavelli is mentioning.
Ask yourself, would your courthouse or Police Station use this font?
Questura di Perugia.
The bulk of kwill's comment I agree with.
But as for the font utilized, don't make assumptions there. Italians have there own sensibilities and one of their cultural contributions is just that, their artistic sensibilities. I have seen grown men in lime green suits with those oh-so-cute totally impractical shoes. What works in Italy may not work, for example, in Seattle. And vice-versa. My internal comment was that Italian men have a freedom to be very flamboyant by US standards at the same time as they are also very macho, by US standards. Now, back to font style. They just might utilize such a font. My quick search has revealed not much different type styles. Don't apply your own sense of propriety to the font used by officials. I am certain that they would consider that very egocentric, or ethnocentric.
You get the idea. This comment makes no statement as to the actual validitiy of the document. I will let the legitimacy of the document play out.
Nice observation. In fact, there are also citizens (Americans) who seem to believe Mignini put forward a ritualistic or Satanic scenario, counseld with psychic Carlizzi on the Narducci case, believe Preston delusion or think Spezi & C are innocent, that docters fabricated bogus HIV tests, that Italian media played by ahthorities disseminated lies against Knox in order to prejudice the trial, that Knox and Sollecits accounts had no contradictions, that Knox never attended a drug dealers ring, that Questura never writes documents in Comic SF, that Stefanoni lied and hid results, and that Conti and Vecchiotti are independent...
What works in Italy may not work, for example, in Seattle. And vice-versa.
You're arguments are fraying at the edges. Spezi is innocent or have you forgot that his case was dismissed? Out of curiosity, how did they get a list of Amanda Knox's sexual partners? And show us the evidence that Knox attended a drug dealers ring? Or that Conti and Vechiotti are not independent.
I notice you have no problem with saying there is a conspiracy involving Hellmann and Conti and Vechiotti and everyone else.
I find it hard to believe that official documents have EVER been printed using the Microsoft COMIC SANS MS. Not exactly a dignified font for official government documents.
I love this font, because it is so informal. But this is the exact reason, they would never use it. But still it is possible, just change the font in Microsoft Office. But what makes that really impossible, is that they would use that font for the the official letterhead for the Questura di Perugia. Also it is interesting that while it is signed, the names are not printed below the
signatures.
The fax that is banging around Twitter is the one Machiavelli is mentioning.
Ask yourself, would your courthouse or Police Station use this font?
Questura di Perugia.
While you might be correct, I still find it hard to believe. I've seen Americans wear garish clothes as well. You usually don't see that in government institutions. I do find the sash that some of their officials wear more than strange. That doesn't mean that official documents would use such an informal font.
I'd really like to see other Questura documents with this font in the LETTERHEAD to be convinced. I have been to their website and nowhere is this font found. Also, for a legal document, the lack of typed names below the signatures seem strange.
The problems moije2 is that we are finding more and more fabricated nonsense news. The Ground Report article, a fake twitter account for Gogerty Marriott, the drug story, Raffaele, throwing Amanda under the bus, etc. etc. etc.
While I can't say 100 percent for sure that this document is fake, the needle is hitting the top of the bs guage. It has all the earmarks of being fraudulent.
I agree. It is just dangerous to make an assumption here. I think I saw others with similar reaction, I just thought it prudent to hold on a bit because the reaction to that document was more visceral, and may not hold true. And we must take into account the possibility of different standards of propriety. After all, IMO, that is no small part of the problem here. One of the things I love about this case is how it exposes different thought patterns. As we all know, the concept of logic has two (at least) worlds when looking at this case.
Amanda 'attended a drug ring'? What does that even mean? Machiavelli, we know she took no hard drugs because they tested her hair and found no trace. That is the end of that canard. Just like negative TMB is the end of the luminol lie. Not that it would matter even if she did take hard drugs and/or have a promiscuous sex life. So what?
I was wondering this, what is a drug ring? You have a student town, which is well known as being a party town with lots of drugs - drug use in the town seems to be so ubiquitous that even prosecution witnesses are using hard drugs and the prosecution don't even question their reliability, which makes me think that perhaps they are using drugs themselves.
And them you have Amanda who tested negative for drug use, her urine test would have indicated cocaine use in the previous few days and her hair strand would have shown cocaine use from at least the last 90-days. I'm assuming that these negative results are the reason why this drug nonsense was never brought to court? All this talk of Amanda being surrounded by drug rings and dealers is making her sound like a paragon of virtue and that she had the strength to say NO, even when surrounded by temptation.
Just as much of this nonsense could have been written about Meredith. She seemed like a fairly normal young girl from just outside London, who enjoyed an active social life - she would needed to have been incredibly sheltered not to have come into contact with people that used drugs and dealt drugs. Her father was even a tabloid journalist and the British media is well known for their love of cocaine - if the situations were reversed it would be easy to create headlines stating nonsense such as 'Meredith's father had contact with known drug dealers'. Even his friend Piers Morgan has admitted to his drug use http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1050530/Piers-Morgan-Why-I-tell-kids-I-did-drugs.html
It's all such nonsense and horribly depressing that this is taken seriously by some idiots![]()
Amanda 'attended a drug ring'? What does that even mean? Machiavelli, we know she took no hard drugs because they tested her hair and found no trace. That is the end of that canard. Just like negative TMB is the end of the luminol lie. Not that it would matter even if she did take hard drugs and/or have a promiscuous sex life. So what?