• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Any Updates on Mark Basile's Study?

WilliamSeger said:
http://markbasile.org/
Click to expand...
This "new" plea for money is based on an interview that is almost a year old.

http://nanothermite911.blogspot.com/2013/08/911-truth-teleconference-interview-with.html

Does anyone really believe this is not a scam run by ANETA? They ran a fake "debate challenge" then donated the money back to themselves.

Has anyone actually seen any of this money? Has anyone actually been able to contact these guys (Not Mark, I doubt he's actually involved in this scam)?
 
Last edited:
Maybe they had their chips tested and were told they are paint ? Of course the lab was paid off by the NWO to falsify the results hence needing to go to another lab and another 5k.

LMFAO let the suckers donate their cash.
 
Spanx said:
Maybe they had their chips tested and were told they are paint ? Of course the lab was paid off by the NWO to falsify the results hence needing to go to another lab and another 5k.

LMFAO let the suckers donate their cash.
Click to expand...
It's more like,

Mark: I found a lab and they're ready to go. can I get a check for a deposit?
ANETA: No problem Mark. How much do you need?
Mark: they want $3000 down.
ANETA: No problem, we'll get that right out.............



ANETA: (to the rubes) Urgent need for more money, Mark has informed us the lab wants more money. $10,000 instead of $5,000. Give now so we can start this important project.


:rolleyes:
 
DGM said:
This "new" plea for money is based on an interview that is almost a year old.

http://nanothermite911.blogspot.com/2013/08/911-truth-teleconference-interview-with.html

Does anyone really believe this is not a scam run by ANETA? They ran a fake "debate challenge" then donated the money back to themselves.

Has anyone actually seen any of this money? Has anyone actually been able to contact these guys (Not Mark, I doubt he's actually involved in this scam)?
Click to expand...

You actually believe this is nothing more than a cash cow?

When donations were few it was called "lack of support".

When donations reflect strong support, you fail to acknowledge it for the endorsement it represents and instead accuse organizers of scamming the unsuspecting.
 
Miragememories said:
You actually believe this is nothing more than a cash cow?

When donations were few it was called "lack of support".

When donations reflect strong support, you fail to acknowledge it for the endorsement it represents and instead accuse organizers of scamming the unsuspecting.
Click to expand...
What strong support? They really haven't shown evidence that they collected anything.

$1000 of this is from the group that started it.

What's your view on the direction the study has already started on? Do you agree it's a pointless waste of limited resources? If you don't agree, please explain.
 
By the way, isn't this a New Investigation™? Why aren't AE911T even mildly interested in funding it?

Never mind, that question was rhetorical. AE911T's purpose is more like this:

research.png

(Comic strip by Andrés Diplotti, http://fleasnobbery.blogspot.com/2009/05/entering.html)
 
pgimeno said:
By the way, isn't this a New Investigation™? Why aren't AE911T even mildly interested in funding it?

Never mind, that question was rhetorical. AE911T's purpose is more like this:

[qimg]http://lh4.ggpht.com/_CWGYdx1rTnM/SiQoNv0RM5I/AAAAAAAAAbI/923xyhifZDk/research.png[/qimg]
(Comic strip by Andrés Diplotti, http://fleasnobbery.blogspot.com/2009/05/entering.html)
Click to expand...
You missed the update:

markbasile.org said:
Mark, Rick, nor any of the Volunteers are not being paid anything.
Web site hosting and updating is donated free by Cosmic internet.
Any remaining funds, if any, will go to AE911Truth with full disclosure here.
Click to expand...

Lot of motivation for a "new investigation". :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Miragememories said:
When donations were few it was called "lack of support".

When donations reflect strong support, you fail to acknowledge it for the endorsement it represents and instead accuse organizers of scamming the unsuspecting.
Click to expand...

Absolutely right. 9/11 bedunkers are obsessed with truther fundraising.

Few/slow donations = "pathetic", "lack of support", "fringe cause"

Increased/fast donations = "gullible truthers", "Dicky Gage's vacation fund", "SCAM!!1!"

That's the level of "analysis" we find here. :D
 
ergo said:
Absolutely right. 9/11 bedunkers are obsessed with truther fundraising.

Few/slow donations = "pathetic", "lack of support", "fringe cause"

Increased/fast donations = "gullible truthers", "Dicky Gage's vacation fund", "SCAM!!1!"

That's the level of "analysis" we find here. :D
Click to expand...
Care to comment on why they would spend the limited resources the way the have reported? It has nothing to do with the original proposal.
 
DGM said:
Care to comment on why they would spend the limited resources the way the have reported? It has nothing to do with the original proposal.
Click to expand...

Care to comment why it's any of your business?
 
ergo said:
Care to comment why it's any of your business?
Click to expand...
I'm just questioning why they would spend money on something that clearly has nothing to do with why the money was raised. Is that wrong?

Odd you wouldn't wonder the samething. Is it just because you trust them without question?
 
DGM said:
I'm just questioning why they would spend money on something that clearly has nothing to do with why the money was raised. Is that wrong?

Odd you wouldn't wonder the samething. Is it just because you trust them without question?
Click to expand...

What are they doing that has nothing to do with their original purpose? What do you think they should be doing? I think your confusion probably stems from a lack of knowledge on the stated research goals.
 
ergo said:
What are they doing that has nothing to do with their original purpose? What do you think they should be doing? I think your confusion probably stems from a lack of knowledge on the stated research goals.
Click to expand...


marks update said:
Money has been raise an tests have begun by independent lab technicians.

Labs have been surveyed for the capabilities they have, including some new capabilities in DSC and Raman (like FTIR).

Staring with known primer chips doing SEM/EDX, FTIR and Raman to characterize chip composition and establish the non production of molten metal/iron from this material during DSC exposure to 400 - 600 Centigrade as well as the exotherm/endotherm character of the primer breakdown.

Next steps: move on to red/gray chips doing the same test, in characterizing composition, then showing the exotherms and reaction products.
Click to expand...

http://markbasile.org/

Explain how this jibes with the original proposal?

This should be good watching you tap dance. You could actually start getting suspicious of their motives. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Proposal:
Sample Preparation:
- Red/gray chip separation using optical microscopy and magnetic attraction to assist in isolation of particles of interest.
- Optical images of collected particulates as collected at appropriate magnifications to record condition as collected.
Sample Analysis:
- SEM/EDX with elemental quantification of red/gray chips, both red and gray layers.
- FTIR analysis of organic components of red/gray chips, both red and gray layers.
- ESCA small spot technique with argon ion sputter for depth profiling to definitively establish the presence of elemental aluminum within the red layer of the red/gray chips. Scans of gray layer also to be taken to add to information base.
- DSC analysis of red/gray chips focusing on exothermic/endothermic reactions near 400 degrees C. Some chips to be scanned in inert atmosphere and some in air or oxygen containing gas stream.
- SEM/EDX with elemental quantification of residual products of DSC analysis of red/gray chips.
- Optical images of reaction products after DSC experiments.
Click to expand...

Quoted to make it easier to watch them try to wiggle out.
 
ergo said:
Sure, you're just unable to explain what those quotes mean.
Click to expand...

What part of his words don't you understand. I'll help you if you can be clear.

ergo said:
Right. And when it's not a "scam", it's a "failure".
Click to expand...

No idea why you would attempt to put these words in my mouth. I simply don't think Mark Basile is fully aware of what is happening to his (frankly) honest attempt at an independent study. I'm all for the proposal that was originally planned.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom