Of course not. You haven't been paying attention.
The Teague study,
Grazing management impacts on vegetation, soil biota and soil chemical, physical and hydrological properties in tall grass prairie, is on holistic managed land in Texas compared to other systems. How do I know this? Because I read the
whole study, check
all the references, checked everything I possibly could about the study including researching the land and the landowners in the study! Clint Josey for example is (or was) actually on the board of directors of
HMI. That's just one example and that's Texas.
There is another ongoing study area in Burleigh County, ND The Burleigh County Soil Conservation District. Evidence for the work being done there is available, but no scientific studies published yet. The evidence is gathered by a team of scientists sent to accredited labs and they specifically started the Menoken farm for that purpose, but the scientific study is still in progress. Gabe Brown on the other hand is a cooperating farmer in ND. He is the practitioner of Holistic Management that was able to dramatically improve his severely degraded farm with HM. Dramatic enough to gain nationwide interest from said scientists.
In simple terms, Gabe tried HM. It worked. So that brought the scientists. They collected data for a few years. They even checked it with other farmers by getting them to change. That worked too. They were very impressed. They decided to run a proper publishable study in the same county so they could rigorously start from the beginning with degraded land with all the proper controls. That is currently funded and has been a couple years, but the study is not published in a scientific study yet. You can find preliminary results with the USDA NRCS and SARE, but nothing published in a science journal...yet.
Go to Arizona.
Terry Wheeler is also a formally trained professional and also used HM to restore land.
link In this case not land that was degraded by conventional agriculture, but instead land that was degraded by mining. Worked consistently for him too. No scientific studies though.
These are all evidences that HM works to restore degraded and desertified land and all back up Savory's claims. One is published in a scientific Journal, and one will be published, and one probably never will be. But all the evidence was collected by trained professionals. So even in the case of unpublished anecdotal evidence, it is very
strong evidence. There are literally hundreds of weaker anecdotal evidences that can be found that HM works consistently, (Like the large number of ranchers using HM receiving awards) but I chose these because they are strong evidences.
I strongly feel the reason you and Reality Check and others are making such ridiculously silly arguments is that you are lazy. You haven't read the studies both for and against thoroughly. You haven't checked the evidence, or the references, or the credentials of the people involved. You haven't even taken the time to learn HM, even though it is free for the asking.
As I said more than once here. Total woo. Your arguments are purely made from ignorance.