So how are you not refusing to test it?
Before any sane person sits an exam they make sure they have studied the subject properly. I'm still learning with full intent of taking the examination. Takes time.
So how are you not refusing to test it?
Before any sane person sits an exam they make sure they have studied the subject properly. I'm still learning with full intent of taking the examination. Takes time.
Before any sane person sits an exam they make sure they have studied the subject properly. I'm still learning with full intent of taking the examination. Takes time.
Hi Mick, why don't you just do a double-blind test for yourself, no need to consider it an exam just a way to make sure you are right.
Hi Mick, why don't you just do a double-blind test for yourself, no need to consider it an exam just a way to make sure you are right.
No, I have never refused to test my claims, I'm just not ready to sit the exam yet.
What items do you have at your disposal? Paper bags, water bottles?
Several simple protocols have already been suggested and you have been pointed to a thread which discusses such protocols. But if you still need it spelt out for you:Please explain in detail what I would need to do to satisfy everyone here.
Before you waste your life learning nothing, don't you think it might be a good idea to test if dowsing works at all first?
Several simple protocols have already been suggested and you have been pointed to a thread which discusses such protocols. But if you still need it spelt out for you:
1. Find something that produces a reliable dowsing response. It might be telling the difference between a bucket that has a bottle of water under it and a bucket that doesn't, an opaque container that contains a phone and an opaque container that doesn't - anything, as long as there are no visual clues that could be giving the location away, and your rods respond to one and not the other when you know which is which.
2. Get 6 buckets/opaque containers, whatever it is that you've settled on, and one of whatever it is you are successfully dowsing for (a bottle of water, a phone, whatever you choose)
3. Find a location where there's unlikely to be any confusing signals you might pick up on. Go over the area with your rods to make sure you're not getting any response.
4. Leave the location whilst someone else lines up the six containers and places the one object under/inside one, throwing a die to decide which one
5. The someone else should then call you to say the location is ready and leave - make sure you don't see them and interact with them in any way
6. Go to the location and use your rods to find the object. Record a hit or a miss.
7. Repeat the test several times.
I would recommend using rigid opaque containers rather than bags, as the shape of the bags might be distorted by the presence of the object. Remember there must be no visual clues.I can try that at my new place, the place my wife hid the cell phone. There are no distractions there. I can also place the bags far apart.
I would recommend using rigid opaque containers rather than bags, as the shape of the bags might be distorted by the presence of the object. Remember there must be no visual clues.
I look forward to your results.
If I do it from lets say 50 yards away it should help rule out the possibility of visual clues. I think it would make it easier for me to dowse the whole lot at once rather than one at a time.
So why don't you set up six poxes on your dining room table?
If I do it from lets say 50 yards away it should help rule out the possibility of visual clues. I think it would make it easier for me to dowse the whole lot at once rather than one at a time.
Does SaskMick claim to be able to detect diseases?