Continuation Part Eight: Discussion of the Amanda Knox/Raffaele Sollecito case

Status
Not open for further replies.
Identifying the people in the car park video would have been rather straightforward. The video camera that captured their images would also have captured the license plates of cars leaving the car park.
 
js202 said:
He is a sociopath.
Click to expand...

The only Italian to be twisted enough to believe this is Maresca.
He seems so vindictive and obstinate, and blinded by his own bs, it wouldnt surprise me.

I mean he already takes a loser,heroin addict, sloth's word over two college kids, why not believe in the rapist-murderer of Meredith too.

Maresca believes in Rudy...he finds him credible.

Who is driving all this bad publicity recently of Rudy being served to the media? Its pretty sick really, that the Pro_Guilters would stoop so low.
 
Desert Fox said:
I am reading about the murder of Devon Guzman. Every knife in the Bloss/Hetzel household was seized during the investigation not just one.
Why would the detective seize just one knife?
Click to expand...

Police inspector Finzi and other police took Raffaele from the late night interrogation to Raffaele's flat to search it. They may have been instructed to look for a knife. When Finzi opened Raffaele's cutlery drawer he picked up the first knife, the one on top, and asked a police officer next to him "will this do?" the second officer told Finzi "it's great".

Others have stated that since the police thought (incorrectly) that they had several guilty parties, the parties would turn on each other and the case would be solved. The police may not have realized that physical evidence would be important in the end, or that it would be subject to intense scrutiny.

Others have suggested that the police thought Raffaele may not have been involved in the murder but that he was providing a false alibi for Amanda's wheteabouts, and that he could be broken and compelled to give her up by frightening him by claiming that this kitchen knife -a random kitchen knife - could be made to look like the murder weapon.
 
Last edited:
Michael B,

Thanks. Do the people in the car park have a line of sight to a possibly open front door?
 
Last edited:
Kestrel said:
Identifying the people in the car park video would have been rather straightforward. The video camera that captured their images would also have captured the license plates of cars leaving the car park.
Click to expand...

The police may have done that at the time and determined that whatever caused people to glance in that direction, or actually pause, turn, and look is of nomconnection or importance to the crime. Who says the issue is I known to the police, just because others are now wondering?

It may be like Amanda's lamp found on the floor near the door in Merefith's room? A postal or other police officer may have introduced it himself to see in at a low angle. Who says the police don't know how it got there?
 
Kestrel said:
Identifying the people in the car park video would have been rather straightforward. The video camera that captured their images would also have captured the license plates of cars leaving the car park.
Click to expand...
.
It should still be straightforward. Those pictures are remarkably well lit and clear. People reading Oggie may recognize the people, or themselves and approach Oggie with information about what it was they were stopping to look at.

Cody
.
 
cctv-perugia.jpg
 
those pictures

anglolawyer,

If those pictures are so important, why didn't Bongiorno mention them in her summary in front of Nencini?
 
Chris_Halkides said:
anglolawyer,

If those pictures are so important, why didn't Bongiorno mention them in her summary in front of Nencini?
Click to expand...

What's your point? :D

I'm afraid I don't know. Maybe they aren't important. Maybe the defence teams didn't know about them. We didn't. There is no reference to them in any of the books but it's hard to see how it would not have been useful to track these people down and ask them what they saw or heard? It's also hard to imagine what could have attracted their attention for as much as 8 minutes.
 
Chris_Halkides said:
anglolawyer,

If those pictures are so important, why didn't Bongiorno mention them in her summary in front of Nencini?
Click to expand...

I find it hard to believe that this hasn't been reviewed and check out before...but then again, we seem to find out over and over and over again that the Perugian police have their own special way of doing things.
 
Samson said:
Remarkably the Oggi article adds 12 minutes and says the time is 21 05
Click to expand...

Now I'm totally confused again. Since this argument was engaged over and over and over again about when Raffaele called the postal police. Oggi is right and I'm wrong. Ooops
 
anglolawyer said:
New stuff turns up in this case all the time. It will continue to do so for one simple reason - fraud.
Click to expand...

If the defense hadn't seen the whole DVD, I'd be surprised...well mildly so. If they hadn't, it would be one more piece of evidence held back by the police and prosecution.
 
Last edited:
Worthless piece of trivia. One of the screenwriters for The new Tom Cruise movie "Edge of Tomorrow" that is opening today is Christopher McQuarrie. He is the writer for Clooney's "Monster of Florence" movie.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom