Scordatura
Critical Thinker
Ignorance of the law is no defence?
But, yes, he's certainly lying. With OP now ruled out of the witness box (afaik) it's a little hard to see how the defence can get back on track.
Psychiatric evidence?
I meant that the court won't expect him to understand the law as thoroughly as a lawyer and might overlook some of his comments regarding involuntary actions. But the court will expect him to understand the laws that pertain to his firearms certification.
It'll be interesting to see if OP's defense presents any psychiatric testimony - I expect they will but I wonder if they'll add in a little something about "temporary insanity" because of OP's statements.