Just a quick thought. If, as Mach tells us, Rudy was never convicted or arrested for any burglaries, why does Nencini refer to him as a professional burglar. Guilters would have us believe that Rudy never committed any burglaries.
If Nencini is calling Rudy a professional burglar, isn't he admitting that ILE knows of previous burglaries he committed?
Is there any previous records from Nencini?
Is he known for this kind of craziness?
Just a quick thought. If, as Mach tells us, Rudy was never convicted or arrested for any burglaries, why does Nencini refer to him as a professional burglar. Guilters would have us believe that Rudy never committed any burglaries.
If Nencini is calling Rudy a professional burglar, isn't he admitting that ILE knows of previous burglaries he committed?
.If you provide those addresses and the sources that validate them I'll add them to my google map that is online here: http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/merediths-cell-phone-helps-pinpoint-time-of-death/
I have 2 open theories for how the DNA got on the bra clasp. The first is that Meredith had gotten the DNA from several boys, including Raffaele, under her finger nail and then transferred that to the one clasp hook before showering and cleaning her nails that morning. The second Is the deliberate contamination of the one hook from an object takes from the dirty prison cell that was presumed to have Raffaele's DNA but also contained DNA from other inmates or guards.
Can anyone else think of other possibilities that account for multiple male profiles being found on the one hook and nothing but Meredith on the other?
Harryrag and Judge Hellmann both agree there is abundant dna of Raffaele on the bra clasp hook. Someone should mediate on which is the best of these two theories to sign off on, as an exercise in bridge building. I note no one has offered any other theory to consider.
I work a lot from memory. In a post acquittal interview, Hellmann said "yes there was Raffaele's dna on the bra clasp". Of that I am certain (he said it).Strictly speaking, Hellman was not entitled to conclude any such thing since by the time C-V got their hands on the clasp its incorrect storage had rendered it useless. IOW we only have Stefanoni's word there was anything on it in the first place and she is a proven liar. That by itself ought to be enough to dispose of it as evidence without delving into hypotheses about how the DNA got there. Since we now know there are female Y-haplos on it I bet one of them is Stef herself and the others are Monica's and Manuela's.
How are Amanda and Raffaele taking this? I mean, it's so surreal it's hard to know how anyone can react to it.
Rolfe.
Brookmyre is frying the same bigger fish as I am at the moment.
Rolfe.
Harryrag and Judge Hellmann both agree there is abundant dna of Raffaele on the bra clasp hook. Someone should mediate on which is the best of these two theories to sign off on, as an exercise in bridge building. I note no one has offered any other theory to consider.
You'll probably spot it if you follow him on Twitter.
Rolfe.
I work a lot from memory. In a post acquittal interview, Hellmann said "yes there was Raffaele's dna on the bra clasp". Of that I am certain (he said it).
I think Dan O's proposition needs a new thread, as do a multitude of subjects.
In simple terms, and contained within this thread, is Planigale's anecdote that she dated an English policeman who said framing is commonplace when we know the perp is guilty (paraphrase please excuse), and you may well have something to add there.
I see no realistic alternative to planting, and Dan O's suggestion that a diminishing presence of male dna is far from scientifically illogical. It falls closely into the Holmes paradigm, no matter how unlikely, if nothing else is on the table, it is likely true.
I think Mignini broke when the pesky family counted the shoe rings, and went to the media.