• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ventura teams up with AE911 in a new video

From that page:

picture.php


*Waves arms* Oh Oh pick me!

"Just how many chair shots to the head did you take as a wrestler Jesse?"
 
Hulk Hogan's teaming up with Architects & Engineers for .... oh wait.
 
Last edited:
From OP's link:
About This Episode
On September 11, 2001, a third building fell in New York City. What really happened to World Trade Center 7 on that infamous day? Jesse Ventura launches his own Counter-Conspiracy investigation into the demise of Building Seven of the World Trade Center. Was it a controlled demolition? Or did fires bring it down like the 9/11 Commission Report alleges? What do you think?

Can these people make up their minds already? Did the Commission Report mention WTC7 or did it not??
 
Makes perfect sense. AE is just showcasing the quality of their engineers. Who better than an ex pro-wrestler. :rolleyes:
 
OMG! The Twin Towers collapsed at "freefall speed"! It's 2004 all over again! (Though Jesse seems to have put on a few pounds.)

The obsession with WTC 7 is hilarious. Most Americans only remember it vaguely, if at all, because it was a sideshow on that horrible day, and nobody died in it.

If "Pete in Peoria" does the slightest bit of study on it, he'll quickly find that it suffered the largest office fire in history, unfought, and that FDNY cleared a zone around it for fear it would collapse. The fact that it did collapse merely proves to "Pete" that FDNY was right.

AE911T's only hope for success is persuading professional scientists and engineers that sufficient evidence exists that the building could not have fallen from those fires and that there is evidence of demolition charges being used. In a pig's eye! :crazy:
 
From OP's link:


Can these people make up their minds already? Did the Commission Report mention WTC7 or did it not??

Referring to the Commission Report is deliberately misleading in the first place. It's like they're pretending the NIST WTC7 report doesn't exist.

The obsession with WTC 7 is hilarious. Most Americans only remember it vaguely, if at all, because it was a sideshow on that horrible day, and nobody died in it.

Right. Even some New Yorkers I have spoken to barely knew about it. I had to show someone from NYC a photo of it and her response was

"Oh yeah, the Salomon Building! I forgot that came down too."
 
Last edited:
The comments, the comments!!!
WardDamonHubbard said:
For all that has taken place since and because of 9/11, it's very important not just for the loved ones who lost family and friends on that day, but also for all the citizens of The United States of America, that another investigation take place, with independent engineers from across the globe of structural engineering, the most upsetting thing to me, is how the Bush administration closed the book on it, fighting everyone who questioned that report, this was nothing like Dec. 7 which through us into WWII, this is much worse, they think that the American public are stupid for even asking, that is the most upsetting, and when I look back at where our great nation ended up after 9/11, it is VERY important that we find out the truth no matter where it takes this nation, and it is the only way this country will heel and correct the direction we are currently on, you don't have to be a engineer to realize that building 7, was a demolition of a calculated and controlled nature, it's the 600 pound gorilla in the room they don't want to talk about, and was a new investigation one of Obama campaign promises? So it not surprising that he lied about that too, this seduo-police state of which we now live in can be traced back to 9/11, so it is very important.
There's a globe of structural engineering!!

Heel, doggies!

Obama promised a new investigation? I musta missed that...

:boxedin:
 
...AE911T's only hope for success is persuading professional scientists and engineers that sufficient evidence exists that the building could not have fallen from those fires and that there is evidence of demolition charges being used. In a pig's eye! :crazy:
I often compare the low probability with the likelihood of aeronautical exploits being demonstrated by members of the family Suidae.
 
From OP's link:


Can these people make up their minds already? Did the Commission Report mention WTC7 or did it not??

I can point to an even bigger problem with that highlighted part; the 9/11 commission report wasn't in any way, shape or form ever intended to act as an engineering investigation. Apparently reading is not their strong suit if they believe it is...
 
I can point to an even bigger problem with that highlighted part; the 9/11 commission report wasn't in any way, shape or form ever intended to act as an engineering investigation. Apparently reading is not their strong suit if they believe it is...

Oh I think they know exactly what the purpose of the Commission Report was.

That's why they mention it instead of NIST. Deliberately trying to make WTC7 seem oh-so-mysterious.
 
Oh I think they know exactly what the purpose of the Commission Report was.

That's why they mention it instead of NIST. Deliberately trying to make WTC7 seem oh-so-mysterious.

By exploiting distrust in political authority I gather
 
Can these people make up their minds already? Did the Commission Report mention WTC7 or did it not??

The 9/11 Commission actually did mention it, in passing: Essentially to the effect that Mayor Giuliani made a bad choice in putting his Emergency Center there. This was part of its recommendations for dealing with terrorism. As has been noted, it was not an engineering study.
 

Back
Top Bottom