• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Zapruder film Question

NWO Sentryman

Proud NWO Gatekeeper
N
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
6,994
I was watching the zapruder film when between frames 202 and 220, JFK is obscured by a sign.

What happened between those frames?
 
From what I can tell nothing happens in those frames. Almost immediately after JFK is shot in the neck/upper back though.
 
Watch this very informative video clip from
'the kennedy assassination- beyond conspiracy'

 
I've always wondered what the "babuska lady" filmed, seen here in the Moorman Polaroid. Why did she never come forward?

muchmore.jpg
 
Alt+F4 said:
I've always wondered what the "babuska lady" filmed, seen here in the Moorman Polaroid. Why did she never come forward?

[qimg]http://i125.photobucket.com/albums/p78/altf4_photo/muchmore.jpg[/qimg]
Click to expand...

Eaten by the one-eyed blob on the slight rise on the left side of the photo -- near the top left corner.
 
Alt+F4 said:
I've always wondered what the "babuska lady" filmed, seen here in the Moorman Polaroid. Why did she never come forward?
Click to expand...
My opinion is that she didn't film anything because she didn't have a camera. I think it's more likely that she was just keeping the sun out of her eyes - in that picture, the sun was to her left, and had just been behind her to her left a moment before. Perhaps she was wearing sunglasses and was putting her left hand there to keep the sun from hitting the inside surface of her left sunglass lens. I think that's more likely than a camera.
 
CurtC said:
My opinion is that she didn't film anything because she didn't have a camera. I think it's more likely that she was just keeping the sun out of her eyes - in that picture, the sun was to her left, and had just been behind her to her left a moment before. Perhaps she was wearing sunglasses and was putting her left hand there to keep the sun from hitting the inside surface of her left sunglass lens. I think that's more likely than a camera.
Click to expand...

That's what "they" want us to believe.
 
CurtC said:
My opinion is that she didn't film anything because she didn't have a camera. I think it's more likely that she was just keeping the sun out of her eyes - in that picture, the sun was to her left, and had just been behind her to her left a moment before. Perhaps she was wearing sunglasses and was putting her left hand there to keep the sun from hitting the inside surface of her left sunglass lens. I think that's more likely than a camera.
Click to expand...

Interesting point. I'm trying to remember if folks just assumed she had a camera because of this photograph or if someone actually said they saw her with a camera.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom