Youtube truthers are damn funny.

Edx

Philosopher
Joined
Feb 1, 2008
Messages
5,642
Check this out (from here)...

... how did the fire burn the bottom of the buildings to make them collapse?

... We don't no that they jumped, ever thought they may have been shot by sniper fire and fallen?

You just gotta love those two comments, you just gotta. :D:D
 
Let me guess… right in the middle? ;)


Yes, and the terrorists were trying to puncture it and make it explode with the plane. But rather than go straight down on top of it, they decided to plow through however many feet of solid, reinforced walls. :)
 
The secret reactor is to maintain a reliable power source for the secret missile battery...

:rolleyes:
 
Sniper fire. Interesting. Where's Bill Smith when you need him? That theory needs a champion!
 
Haha! That sniper fire comment was pretty good. A long time ago I was debating a truther on facebook, and I came along this quote of a truther talking about the Pentagon:

"If the building is hardened against such an attack, why isn't the plane piled up in front of the building."

I think that facebook truthers are just as funny as youtube truthers. ;)
 
I love youtube truthers...
I had one want to debate me about the nist report.. in 500 characters at a time.

Or the one who believes the jets were real, but were loaded with thermite.

or that instead of flight 77 at the pentagon it was a SNARK missle.

It would be funny if it wasn't such a sad display of how piss poor the public education system in the US and the UK is.
 
Last edited:
It would be funny if it wasn't such a sad display of how piss poor the public educaiton system in the US and the UK is.

It appears Michael Bay is the one educating most of these people about physics.
 
I had a youtube truther tell me that The people didn't jump, they fell off when the buildings shook due to the explosions, and another one tell me that Nobody would have the immorality to fly a plane into a building.
 
I'm still trying to figure out how somebody can think that nobody would have the immorality to fly a plane into a building, yet somebody could have the immorality to kill 3000 innocent people and blame it on a plane flying into a building.

Some people are just out-and-out stupid, truther or not.
 
I love youtube truthers...
I had one want to debate me about the nist report.. in 500 characters at a time.

Or the one who believes the jets were real, but were loaded with thermite.

or that instead of flight 77 at the pentagon it was a SNARK missle.

It would be funny if it wasn't such a sad display of how piss poor the public education system in the US and the UK is.

I know I mentioned it before but it still amazes me. It's the guy who showed up on one of my model videos and claimed it was an inside job.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lhf6mfnZyME (oldest comment)
Even though I made the model, he knows what I was trying to do.
 
Last edited:
I love youtube truthers...
I had one want to debate me about the nist report.. in 500 characters at a time.

Or the one who believes the jets were real, but were loaded with thermite.

or that instead of flight 77 at the pentagon it was a SNARK missle.

It would be funny if it wasn't such a sad display of how piss poor the public education system in the US and the UK is.

The masses just arent interested in science or cirtical thinking....they would rather be watching reality TV listening to some moron go on and on about stuff that isnt relevant to anything.....
 
Funny. I just stumbled across this book at Borders today. Although stupidity on YouTube knows no age boundries, I'd guess that the demographic covered in the book is your typical YouTube commentor.
 
I've been collecting truther quotes for some time now. Here are some of the better YouTube quotes I have:

User Aanthanur at YouTube explains why he researches conspiracy theories, to find errors...he might want to check his spelling for errors first : "actually i did some research, thats why i foudn somany errors in rkowens videos."

User enomarekim from YouTube speculates about the phone calls from F93: "If this is true , then the cell phone calls telling the story of patriotic heroism may have been synthycized, especially since cell phones didn't work above 8,000 feet in 2001, although I dont know how high up they were."

User webfairy at YouTube's hypothesis about how the government planted fake human remains at the Pentagon site: "People got ashes from stolen bodies various funeralgate cemetaries were too cheap to bury"

"our self clening over does not reach temperatures above 500 degrees and the fires in the tower were much above 500 degrees. DID someone fly a plane into your oven? No logic here at all" - User Kyles45angel at YouTube

[A truther describing the crash of Flight 93] - "If thats true then that airplane and everybody on it might be dead from shock but they should be perfectly preserved because you can't have fire underground with no oxygen.But I never saw those pictures." – User SlimJim06 at YouTube

"A Boeing 757 (empty) weighs 60 tons. Second: the weight of each tower was 500,000 ton. So extra weight was as low as 0.012%. Assuming man's weight 200 pounds, 0.012% is equal to 0.024 pound or third of ounce. So a pack of cigarettes in our pocket makes you fall down? So sad. Not funny." – User “psyopagent” at YouTube

"the wtc was a demolition they had bombs put in ther so the towers would fall down not fall over sidways and kill all of the other buildings" – user “nobish” from YouTube
 
Dem dhere twoofers sure am dumb. hardy har har yuck yuck! Ain't dhay? Ain't dhayyyyy? duuurrrrr
 
I had a youtube truther tell me that The people didn't jump, they fell off when the buildings shook due to the explosions, and another one tell me that Nobody would have the immorality to fly a plane into a building.


Including the people he believes orchestrated the attacks? Or is he a no-planer?
 

Back
Top Bottom