andyandy
anthropomorphic ape
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2006
- Messages
- 8,377
Taken from http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/organgrinder/2006/10/hypotheticals_would_you_accept.html
the questions were composed as a BBC seminar topic for "impartiality in the digital age." They posed the following hypothetical questions to a panel comprising of media presenters/broadcasters.....
You can read their opinions here http://media.guardian.co.uk/bbc/story/0,,1885170,00.html
What do you think?
the questions were composed as a BBC seminar topic for "impartiality in the digital age." They posed the following hypothetical questions to a panel comprising of media presenters/broadcasters.....
Here are the hypotheticals:
1) You have hired a female newsreader, who is Muslim. She's a great success. A few months later, she returns from holiday in Lahore wearing a hijab that she insists on wearing on screen. What do you do?
2)
a) Sacha Baron Cohen records an episode of Room 101. It's a great show. He nominates kosher food, the Archbishop of Canterbury and the Bible for inclusion in Room 101. Are you happy to broadcast this?
b) Late breaking news: he also includes the Qur'an. Are you still happy to broadcast it?
3)
a) Osama bin Laden agrees to an interview. The only pre-conditions are that it will be an hour long and you'll broadcast the entire interview. Do you agree?
b) As the interview ends Bin Laden insists on keeping the reporter "as a guest" until the interview is broadcast, so that he can ensure there's no back-pedalling on the conditions. Do you agree?
c) Do you inform the appropriate anti-terror authorities of the interview before broadcasting it - including the location where it took place?
You can read their opinions here http://media.guardian.co.uk/bbc/story/0,,1885170,00.html
What do you think?
Last edited: