Win some, lose some - Hulda Clark zapper case

Deetee

Illuminator
Joined
Jul 8, 2003
Messages
3,789
http://icwales.icnetwork.co.uk/0100...52319&method=full&siteid=50082-name_page.html

One that got away!
Looks like the prosecution had not established a prior claim that this guy said he could cure cancer (yeah, right...) so they seem to have botched it.

Roy McKinnon, 62, a former Royal Bank of Scotland official, had been treating ill people including cancer patients with a battery powered "zapper" which he said could alter their DNA.

"After finishing my life as a banker I started to learn about alternative medicine. Now I regard myself as a teacher who can help others to understand their medical problems. I never said I could cure cancer."
 
Another Quote for what's the harm thread maybe?

Professor Edzard Ernst who headed the study said, "Cancer patients get confused in the maze of claims and counter-claims and often turn to the internet for information which can give advice that has led to real harm and even death in some cases."

O.
 
Orangutan said:
Another Quote for what's the harm thread maybe?



O.

Anyone send this to Bob Carroll's Skeptic's Dictionary yet? He has a "What's the harm?" section there too...
 

Back
Top Bottom