Brainster
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- May 26, 2006
- Messages
- 21,935
We should all honor Willie Rodriguez for his efforts on 9-11, which resulted in the saving of many lives. But the Willie Rodriguez of today deserves disapprobation. Get this announcement:
Yes, that's right; Willie's going to be following in the footsteps of David Duke in bringing the "truth" to Iran. There is some unintentional humor in the post by the odious Jon Gold:
It's not hard to see why Ahmedinejad and his lackeys over at the Ministry of Cultural Affairs want Willie to talk about how the United States is responsible for the crime of the century. But suppose back in 1942 that an American had traveled to Berlin to give a speech about how Roosevelt had secretly allowed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor. Would there be any doubt that he would be accused of treason?
And in fairness, it must be noted that some of the 9-11 Deniers over at 9-11 Blogger are appalled. Unfortunately, they're not appalled at Willie for going, but for how the media will spin this against their little movement.
Rodriguez himself responds:
It's easy to say that he's going as part of a peace effort, but is there any doubt that the Iranians are going to use his 9-11 statements as a propaganda coup?
ETA: Yes, traitor is too strong a word. I am using it in the pundit sense, not in the technical sense.
William Rodriguez, the last survivor of the North Tower has been formally invited by the Iranian Government to give a series of presentations about 9/11 in Iran. The reason he was invited, was because they saw his presentation in front of 22,000 Muslims during his recent U.K. tour. The Ministry of Cultural Affairs thought it would be a good idea as a "Peace Mission" to bring Rodriquez to Iran.
Yes, that's right; Willie's going to be following in the footsteps of David Duke in bringing the "truth" to Iran. There is some unintentional humor in the post by the odious Jon Gold:
Rodriquez says that he "feels very honored that he has been tapped to do these series of presentations as a peace initiative, and he feels he will be more protected in these countries than in his own."
Given that the Venezuelan Government thought enough of Willie to provide him 5 bodyguards during his stay there, I can see why.
It's not hard to see why Ahmedinejad and his lackeys over at the Ministry of Cultural Affairs want Willie to talk about how the United States is responsible for the crime of the century. But suppose back in 1942 that an American had traveled to Berlin to give a speech about how Roosevelt had secretly allowed the Japanese to attack Pearl Harbor. Would there be any doubt that he would be accused of treason?
And in fairness, it must be noted that some of the 9-11 Deniers over at 9-11 Blogger are appalled. Unfortunately, they're not appalled at Willie for going, but for how the media will spin this against their little movement.
Be careful here William.... they are going to try and link you with Iran... afraid this may be another attempt to discredit this movement.
I completely agree. If William goes to Iran, he will be inextricably linked with Iran and viewed as disruptive and anti-American. Recommend he doesn't go.
Rodriguez himself responds:
I am invited from all over the world to speak. Some countries are more crucial than others. This is an effort to bridge the communication with victims of 9/11 with the Iranian community so they understand how 5 years after we are still suffering. Also to help set up a blueprint to avoid future emergencies. I help, and for free, all the goverments that want to setup a family assistance center for victims of disasters.
It's easy to say that he's going as part of a peace effort, but is there any doubt that the Iranians are going to use his 9-11 statements as a propaganda coup?
ETA: Yes, traitor is too strong a word. I am using it in the pundit sense, not in the technical sense.
Last edited: