Will "appeaser" be the new "communist"?

[jj]

Let's look at what some of our compassionate conservatives here are calling people.

For instance, Patrick has dishonestly called me an "appeaser". He's called other people "appeaser" as well, and some others have picked up the howl, and started to bay as a pack.

So, folks, what do you think, are they going to try to hunt down "appeasers" like McCarthy tried to hunt down "commies"?

It's interesting to hear that a pro-military, anti-Saddamn person like myself is somehow an "appeaser", but I guess that's how it works in a dishonest, totalitarian state, or, wait, will there be some price Patrick and his friends pay for calling people dishonest, unjustifiable names?

 

[Patrick]

"McCarthy"? Take two paranoid pills and call me in the morning. Also, stop calling me a "conservative". Appeasers will never be the new communists - the founding communists were intellectuals.

 

[jj]

"McCarthy"? Take two paranoid pills and call me in the morning. Also, stop calling me a "conservative". Appeasers will never be the new communists - the founding communists were intellectuals.

Are you ready to admit, yet, that you lied outright, told a completely fabricated lie, when you called me an appeaser?

Can you "be a man" and admit that you absolutely and incontrovertably wronged me when you made that lie?

Can you stand up for truth?

 

[Patrick]

Are you ready to admit, yet, that you lied outright, told a completely fabricated lie, when you called me an appeaser?

Visiting this site, for me, is like visiting a liberal/left Bedlam in the 1700's - one may be forgiven if he walks out and says "They're all nuts in there!", when one person was actually just an attendant.

All right, tell me succintly your opinion on america's proper response to the IFs, paying particular attention to what, if anything, should be done about the foreign IFs in Iraq now. Please focus on the "now", not what couldhave/shouldhave been done.

 

[Zep]

Don't bother jj. Patrick is getting his kicks from stirring people up, and that's all. I'm calling major troll on him.

 

[jj]

All right, tell me succintly your opinion on america's proper response to the IFs, paying particular attention to what, if anything, should be done about the foreign IFs in Iraq now. Please focus on the "now", not what couldhave/shouldhave been done.

There we have it from Patrick, perhaps accidentally, an admission that while he doesn't even know my position on a given subject, he's already lied by claiming that he knows it, and knows WHAT my position is.

So, Patrick, why did you lie about my position when in fact you have now admitted that you don't even know what it is?

It's just like all your other blatherings. You just MAKE IT ALL UP, Patrick, you just MAKE IT ALL UP.

Have you any ethics or morals whatsoever?

 

[jj]

Don't bother jj. Patrick is getting his kicks from stirring people up, and that's all. I'm calling major troll on him.

It's ok, Zep, I had to point out that he'd claimed a position for me, and then had to turn around and ask what my position was.

If that's not an admission . . .

 

[Patrick]

So, Patrick, why did you lie about my position when in fact you have now admitted that you don't even know what it is?

What a sh_t. I as much as make the concession you want, invite you to focus on the issue and establish your correct position, but you just keep on with your victim whimpering. Once again - succinctly state your position on Iraq.

 

[jj]

So, Patrick, why did you lie about my position when in fact you have now admitted that you don't even know what it is?

What a sh_t. I as much as make the concession you want, invite you to focus on the issue and establish your correct position, but you just keep on with your victim whimpering. Once again - succinctly state your position on Iraq.

No, Patrick, let's play the game according to the rules. You, incorrectly and igorantly, lied about me and called me an "appeaser". You clearly and obviously have no idea of my position on the subject, yet you made a direct, offensive attack. You simply MADE IT UP like you MAKE LOTS OF THINGS UP.

It's not my job to defend YOUR lies, Patrick, it's your job.

You made the assertion, YOU take total and absolute responsibility for it, from inception to finish. I'm simply calling out your lie, and pointing out that once again PATRICK MADE IT ALL UP.

You don't know my position, and your repeated pleading with me to tell it to you shows that you aren't even willing to invest the time in using the search engine here to find out the truth about something THAT YOU MADE A DEFINITIVE STATEMENT ABOUT WHILE IN COMPLETE IGNORANCE.

Once again PATRICK MAKES IT ALL UP. Imagine that.