Why there are no 9/11 whistleblowers...

Garb

Graduate Poster
Garb
Joined
Oct 15, 2006
Messages
1,005
http://www.opednews.com/articles/not_sh_george_w_071210_would_a_9_2f11_conspir.htm

Their greatest evidence?

But anyone who's seen a Tom Clancy movie knows that a handful of bad guys can pull off big conspiracies, especially when they've got a high-level military or government person on board
Click to expand...

Of course you can't forget Jason Bourne:

Jason Bourne (the fictional character in the Bourne movies) kept people quiet by offering 2 alternatives: He told them that he'd pay them alot of money if they cooperated; or he'd kill them if they didn't.

Bourne had his own code of honor and was a good guy. If the 9/11 masterminds wanted to keep people quiet, they would probably be alot more ruthless, as they apparently do not follow Mr. Bourne's code of honor.
Click to expand...

So Bill Clinton can't get away from a two person secret but the Bush Administration is smart enough to pull off something like 9/11? Alrighty then.
 
But anyone who's seen a Tom Clancy movie knows that a handful of bad guys can pull off big conspiracies, especially when they've got a high-level military or government person on board
Click to expand...

Holy stundie. He really wrote that.

OK - I'm off to clone me some dinosaurs using fossilised mosquitoes. Anyone got a frog?
 
qarnos said:
Holy stundie. He really wrote that.

OK - I'm off to clone me some dinosaurs using fossilised mosquitoes. Anyone got a frog?
Click to expand...

On the now defunct iwon politics board, someone blamed the 2004 tsunami on the Bush admin, citing James Bond movies as proof of high tech gadgets that we don't know about. :boxedin:
 
What a find, this guy is a total freak:

crazy guy's blog said:
So here's a potential scenario:

One guy in the Bush-linked security company lets in the bomb-setters;

A 2-man crew of demolition experts sets the radio-controlled explosives while everyone is out of the building;

And the same crew detonates the explosives using a radio transceiver.

That adds only 3 more guys.

So, we're now up to perhaps 7 people total to pull off 9/11 (Cheney, another guy making sure intelligence warnings aren't acted on, the secret service agent and the the radar guy, the security guy and the two-man demolition crew).
Click to expand...

Keep in mind the "radar guy" is a "guy sitting at a computer inserting false radar blips onto air traffic controllers' screens."
 
A 2-man demolitions crew? I hope he's not one of those kooks that believes every floor had to be blown...
 
Why there are no 9/11 whistleblowers...
Click to expand...
That's easy.

Because there was no inside job on which to blow the whistle.

Prove me wrong, Troofers. You've failed heroically thus far.
 
Last edited:
And there we have it folks: An admission that Troofers' source of a great, superior knowledge of physics and geopolitics is Hollywood.
 
I'm just surprised that no one has referred to MacGyver's methods yet. There was a man who could have managed the WTC demolition, with a couple of paperclips, a peanut butter sandwich, and a recording of the Vienna Boys' Choir singing "It's Pesach Time in Dixieland."
 
What the CTs fail to comprehend is the complex logistics behind just one of their wild claims.

Take for example, planted aircraft wreckage. This of course had to be some small sub-operation of the master plan. The wreckage had to be planned, designed, artistically fabricated, stealthily planted while the MIB flashy thing erased the memories of the witnesses at the scene. A hundred people on that operation alone if they needed to design and fabricate all that stuff within a few months.

It boggles the mind that these details escape the thought processes of CTs :boggled:
 
FramerDave said:
And there we have it folks: An admission that Troofers' source of a great, superior knowledge of physics and geopolitics is Hollywood.
Click to expand...
I don't understand why we haven't won the war in Iraq yet, considering we have all those guns you never have to reload. :confused:
 
SDC said:
I'm just surprised that no one has referred to MacGyver's methods yet. There was a man who could have managed the WTC demolition, with a couple of paperclips, a peanut butter sandwich, and a recording of the Vienna Boys' Choir singing "It's Pesach Time in Dixieland."
Click to expand...


The Professor from Gilligan's Island can beat MacGyver hands down.

He built a color TV out of some shells, coconuts and a 19" picture tube that washed ashore. They even had a VCR, but all their tapes were Beta.
 
Last edited:
Alferd_Packer said:
The Professor from Gilligan's Island can beat MacGyver hands down.

He built a color TV out of some shells, coconuts and a 19" picture tube that washed ashore. They even had a VCR, but all their tapes were Beta.
Click to expand...
but the professor really didnt do bombs, mcgyver on the other hand...

Barbara Spener: Don't tell me you know how to make a bomb out of a stick of chewing gum.
MacGyver: Why, you got some?
 
FramerDave said:
And there we have it folks: An admission that Troofers' source of a great, superior knowledge of physics and geopolitics is Hollywood.
Click to expand...

Wasn't it Uncle Fetzer who wrote "Everything you need to know about 9-11 can be found in the movies?" Or was that Alex?

Steve S.
 
defaultdotxbe said:
but the professor really didnt do bombs, mcgyver on the other hand...

Barbara Spener: Don't tell me you know how to make a bomb out of a stick of chewing gum.
MacGyver: Why, you got some?
Click to expand...

Am I the only one who's really itching to see the MacGyver special on MythBusters?

And it's not shocking that CTers actually think Hollywood plots are remotely realistic. I mean, just look at all the movies....documentaries, sorry, that are released every year.

Hell, I'm sure that "The Hunt for Red October" is considered a docudrama by some in the CT crowd.
 
Don't the good guys always figure out the conspiracy plot in Clancy novels anyways?
 
Alt+F4 said:
What a find, this guy is a total freak:

Keep in mind the "radar guy" is a "guy sitting at a computer inserting false radar blips onto air traffic controllers' screens."
Click to expand...

Wow, just... wow. That is debunkable on so many levels. Let's break it down.

So here's a potential scenario:

One guy in the Bush-linked security company lets in the bomb-setters;
Click to expand...

The "Bush-linked" security company lost their contract to the World Trade Center in 1998. Debunked.

A 2-man crew of demolition experts sets the radio-controlled explosives while everyone is out of the building;
Click to expand...

There was never a point in time when "everyone [was] out of the building". It would also take a 2 man team days just to complete one floor. I base that on previous demolition preparation time. Then there's the whole fact that such an operation would involve large amounts of physical labor and removing of walls etc. Shaped charges would have to be huge and fitted with machinery to cut through steel so large . Debunked.

And the same crew detonates the explosives using a radio transceiver.
Click to expand...

Radio detonated explosives in such a large building? Too risky. Debunked.

That adds only 3 more guys.

So, we're now up to perhaps 7 people total to pull off 9/11 (Cheney, another guy making sure intelligence warnings aren't acted on, the secret service agent and the the radar guy, the security guy and the two-man demolition crew).
Click to expand...

Ridiculous. Debunked. :)
 
There are no whistle blowers because there are no whistles to blow. Al Qaeda did it. Now move on. =)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom