• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Why perform online psi experiments like this?

davidsmith73

Graduate Poster
D
Joined
Jul 25, 2001
Messages
1,697
Rupert Sheldrake has been conducting an online experiment in remote staring that is completely uncontrolled. Basically, two participants are given instructions to play the role of sender and receiver. The sender is given an instruction to either stare or not stare (chosen randomly) and is told to start each trial with the use of a mechanical click or beep. However because the experiment is online, the participants are free to start the trials in any way they want, for example by saying "start". Rupert would never know the difference. Furthermore he actually acknowledges this! :

"Because these experiments took place under uncontrolled and unsupervised conditions, we cannot eliminate the possibility that some people were cheating, or that some starers were inadvertently giving clues to the subjects by the way they gave the signal for the beginning of the trial or by unintentional sounds that were different in the staring and the not staring trials."


This makes the results of the experiment completely invalid! (which are extremely significant by the way). There's no point in doing this kind of experiment. I used to respect Rupert as a sceintist but I'm having my doubts of late.

online staring experiment
 
davidsmith73 said:
This makes the results of the experiment completely invalid! (which are extremely significant by the way). There's no point in doing this kind of experiment. I used to respect Rupert as a sceintist but I'm having my doubts of late.

online staring experiment
Click to expand...
This is part of the problem with paranormal researchers. And one where they are actually slightly more hindered than normal scientists.

If a 'normal' scientist researchnig an unexciting area performed such a sloppy experiment it would not necessarily count against earlier excellent studies they may have caried out.

But researchers into paranormal fields are treated particularly sceptically at the best of times, no matter how stringent their studies are. They moment one of them initiates such an uncontrolled experiment as this it is (fairly or unfairly) bound to raise questions about how controlled their earlier work was, regardless of how well it genuinely was undertaken.

Sheldrake is certainly making life more difficult for himself by initiating such uncontrolled studies which will of course be a waste of time as they can't possibly be said to conclude anything useful, no matter what the results.
That's a shame. I don't really understand what he is trying to achieve here.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom