Why Are the Majority of Those in Hell the Poor and Oppressed Masses?

Or we can always listen to Sartre from Huis Clos: l'enfer, c'est les autres.
I've always subscribed to Havamal's "man is manu's joy", but these days i have begun to feel that maybe Sartre was right after all...

No, both are right. It's just the quantities of hell versus joy that vary, and hell seems to have the upper hand now. But then joy in other people becomes even more important... (That was frighteningly close to being a deepity.)
 
Dear Emre, nice to see you back. As for hell, it does not actually exist. As a spiritualist who has attended many trance lectures when mediums allowed themselves to be taken in trance by spirits who spoke with their mouths. I can tell you that they say there is no actual heaven or hell. There are many planes of existence in the afterlife, ranging from dark planes where evil people go, to beautiful realms were good people go. But these planes of existence are not for eternity. Evil people can repent and reincarnate to continue their evolution. This is the real truth, and what it says in the Quran is all bunk. I recommend you to study spiritualism and the practical occult, and throw the unholy Quran away.
 
The ability of believers to recognise everybody else's beliefs as bunk but not their own never ceases to amaze me.

Emre has just as much evidence and justification for his beliefs as you have for yours, i.e. none whatever.
All the evidence Emre has is the unholy Quran. That is no evidence at all because the Quran is evil lies about God.
 
Hello Scorpion; in reality, paradise and hell exist, but souls do not. What you call Spiritualism is the modern-day version of paganism. It is a terrible trap. As you can see, the Jinn continue to make you writhe and make you forgetful. You have been badly deceived. Let me share the video again where I explain the true face of Spiritualism:

 
michael-scott.gif
 
The ability of believers to recognise everybody else's beliefs as bunk but not their own never ceases to amaze me.
It's quite the spectacle to watch two people so utterly and irrationally convinced of their own beliefs and so firmly convinced of the other's error. I almost want to invoke Billy Baxter to come make this a three-cornered fight.

But all seriousness aside, this is why it's important to keep framing secular life as an absence of religion and not a religion of absence. We impose the same standard of proof on everyone and if no one makes the cut then they all fail. It's not that hard a concept. No jinns, no karma angels, no magic beings at all—just evidence and reason. It's a shame that so many people can't see that as the obvious common denominator.
 

Back
Top Bottom