I thought maybe a brief period of Googling might provide the answer to this but no joy so far.
Is there any advantage to using newer music formats such as AAC and WMA rather than the much older MP3? These newer formats have better compression than MP3 and so should be better quality for the same file size. However it seems this is only noticeable at low bitrates < 128kbps. Above that and apparently the differences are 'comparable'.
I realise that MP3 is far more portable due to it's popularity. But it is fifteen years old now and it seems a shame not to use something newer and improved and still keep the files relatively small.
Does anyone know of any listening tests comparing the different formats? Is there a good reason to change from MP3?
Thanks.
Is there any advantage to using newer music formats such as AAC and WMA rather than the much older MP3? These newer formats have better compression than MP3 and so should be better quality for the same file size. However it seems this is only noticeable at low bitrates < 128kbps. Above that and apparently the differences are 'comparable'.
I realise that MP3 is far more portable due to it's popularity. But it is fifteen years old now and it seems a shame not to use something newer and improved and still keep the files relatively small.
Does anyone know of any listening tests comparing the different formats? Is there a good reason to change from MP3?
Thanks.