Where is the documentation on Rosmary Hunter's prequalification?

george@etcorngods.co

Banned
G
Joined
Aug 23, 2007
Messages
72
I've looked over the FREF threads, and can't find evidence of Ms Hunter's qualifications for the Million $ Challenge.
Where is the evidence of her "media presence"?
Where is the evidence of her "academic" certification?

Who is she -- a google search doesn't come up with anything except the FREF stuff?
 
Last edited:
Snow said:
Challenge Applications sub-forum - link
Click to expand...
That link doesn't answer any of my questions. Points to an article -- no longer available, and mentions an unnamed "academic".

I repeat my concern:

Where is the evidence of her "media presence"?
Where is the evidence of her "academic" certification?

Who is she -- a google search doesn't come up with anything except the JREF stuff?

If the amazing is going to have rules for pre-qualification for the Challenge, shouldn't he provide evidence of compliance. Usually, when i criticize the great "amazing", the post is removed. Lets see how long it takes for them to remove this thread.
 
Last edited:
george@etcorngods.co said:
That link doesn't answer any of my questions. Points to an article -- no longer available, and mentions an unnamed "academic".

I repeat my concern:

Where is the evidence of her "media presence"?
Where is the evidence of her "academic" certification?

Who is she -- a google search doesn't come up with anything except the FREF stuff?

If the amazing is going to have rules for pre-qualification for the Challenge, shouldn't he provide evidence of compliance. Usually, when i criticize the great "amazing", the post is removed. Lets see how long it takes for them to remove this thread.
Click to expand...
No...I'd suggest your posts are removed when you breach one of the rules.

I find it interesting, you seem to get awfully pushy when YOUR questions are not answered...yet you blow off questions from other folks. Personally (and I'm sure other are as well), I'm still waiting for your proof wrt being the PM for say SERT II...or being the inventor of the CRT based word processor.

Anyway...I've never heard of "FREF"; if your questions are about "FREF" and what ever challenge they do, perhaps you should go to their site and ask them.

If, however, your questions are about the JREF...they seem reasonable and I'm sure will be answered in kind. Of course, call me overly cynical, but I predict you'll claim what ever is provided as unsatisfactory....and well can all guess your next step.
 
Locknar said:
No...I'd suggest your posts are removed when you breach one of the rules.

I find it interesting, you seem to get awfully pushy when YOUR questions are not answered...yet you blow off questions from other folks. Personally (and I'm sure other are as well), I'm still waiting for your proof wrt being the PM for say SERT II...or being the inventor of the CRT based word processor.

Anyway...I've never heard of "FREF"; if your questions are about "FREF" and what ever challenge they do, perhaps you should go to their site and ask them.

If, however, your questions are about the JREF...they seem reasonable and I'm sure will be answered in kind. Of course, call me overly cynical, but I predict you'll claim what ever is provided as unsatisfactory....and well can all guess your next step.
Click to expand...

I have counted over 500 rule breaking posts in the "District Court" thread and none have been removed -- including all the posts you made.

May I suggest you stop your characteristic gibberish unless you have the answers to my questions.
 
Last edited:
george@etcorngods.co said:
Where is the evidence of her "media presence"?
Where is the evidence of her "academic" certification?

Who is she -- a google search doesn't come up with anything except the FREF stuff?
Click to expand...

When will you answer some of our questions?

Is it common practice for you to keep in contact with people or organisations that you are in the process of suing?

How were you Project Manager of SERT II when that project wasn't even approved until two years after you left NASA?


Please note I am not a JREF representative, just a forum member.
 
People, there are plenty of threads to demand George provide evidence for his various claims. Please keep this thread to the topic of Rosemary Hunter's qualifications. Thank you.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson
 
I presume the actual documentation is held by JREF. Why would they need to post the information publicly when it is something that is done to satisfy them that the individual qualifies for the challenge? The first post in the following thread mentions the article which qualified her for the media presence which is no longer available online.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89877
 
Professor Yaffle said:
I presume the actual documentation is held by JREF.
Click to expand...

More than just that, it's entirely possible that no such documentation exists. As I understand it, the point in requiring somebody to be publicly recognized was put in place to help screen out people who apply or constantly bother the administrative staff with no intention of ever carrying through with a test. I don't think it's absolutely carved in stone, and if James Randi decides to test someone - even if they don't meet the ordinary requirements for having a media presence - it's entirely at his discretion.

Of course, I'm not an official representative of the JREF, but that's my assumption - that Randi decided that the applicant was serious enough to make it worth his while to conduct the test, even if it fell outside normal prerequisite guidelines.
 
Huh? The guy who is suing the JREF opens a thread asking for help in researching a challenge application?

LOL.
 
George,

The documentation for Rosemary Hunter is in her file, which I closed after the test and gave to Jeff Wagg.

Challenge files are held at JREF headquarters, and it is possible to make an appointment with the JREF to view the files for research purposes.

Ms. Hunter fulfilled all the qualifications, including media presence and an affidavit from an academic.

~Remie
 
wahrheit said:
Huh? The guy who is suing the JREF opens a thread asking for help in researching a challenge application?

LOL.
Click to expand...


Oh, I suspect he's just trying to dig up more evidence of the JREF acting in complete disregard of its own rules.

Did I get that right, George?
 
Last edited:
Actually, Rosemary Hunter is remarkably absent from any of my google searches except in the form of references to the challenge and other people with the same name. The media presense bar may well be met, but this test shows it's set very low.
 
moopet said:
Actually, Rosemary Hunter is remarkably absent from any of my google searches except in the form of references to the challenge and other people with the same name. The media presense bar may well be met, but this test shows it's set very low.
Click to expand...


I am reminded of the Family Guy episode in which the entire family gets exposed to toxic waste. Each gets a special super power; Meg gets the ability to grow her finger nails.

It could be that the press has passed on Rosemary Hunter's story just because her super power -- the ability to induce urination -- is about as exciting as Meg's super power.
 
moopet said:
Actually, Rosemary Hunter is remarkably absent from any of my google searches except in the form of references to the challenge and other people with the same name. The media presense bar may well be met, but this test shows it's set very low.
Click to expand...

As it is at this time, the media presence requirement requires a single article, interview, mention in a book, etc. None can be self-created or self-published, and the media must address both the person applying and the ability they claim for the Challenge.
 
And interesting that although the linked article mentioned her supposed ability, she didn't actually make it happen. She should have applied based on her ability to make people woozy and nauseous. I wasn't in the chatroom that day (and I hadn't read the article then either), but did Jeff feel woozy and nauseous?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom