Re: Re: Re: What is beauty?
c4ts said:
To clearly define beauty is really just to say something precise about it that is true when applied to its meaning.
That's what I was hoping you would say! Here, then, are my thoughts on and my definition of beauty:
Beauty can change with the times. Big Reubenesque women were considered beautiful when Reubens painted them; now smaller, more athletic women are considered more beautiful.
Beauty can be man-made (artwork) or be natural and be destroyed by man's modifications (the side of a snow-covered mountain with ski tracks all over it).
The best definition I can come up with for beauty is "that which is difficult to achieve." Large women were considered beautiful in Reubens' time because there weren't that many of them; these days, having a well-toned, athletic body is more difficult to achieve, so bodies like that are considered beautiful.
A pristine snow-covered mountain is more beautiful than one with ski tracks all over it because it's easier to put ski tracks on a mountainside than it is to take them off.
Pictures from the Hubble telescobe are beautiful because they were difficult to obtain. While moonlight is considered beautiful, the Moon itself isn't considered very beautiful because it's not difficult to observe.
That's my definition. I welcome the chance to refine it.