• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

What is a mole?

RationalVetMed

Graduate Poster
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
1,467
Not really a sceptical question, but does anyone have a simple definition of a mole, in chemistry for my daughter, who is very confused about what it means?

We've googled it but most of the definitions are complex (though correct, I'm sure) and difficult to understand for one who is just starting chemistry at this level and is struggling with basic concepts (and one (me!) who probably never fully grasped the concept and anyway hasn't done chemistry for very many years).

Thanks in advance,

Yuri
 
It's a quantity of a substance which contains the number of particles equal to the number of atoms in exactly 12 g of carbon-12. "Particles" refers to atoms (for metals and some other elements), molecules (for molecular compounds, or molecular elements such as hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, and the halogens), or formula units (for ionic compounds).

This number is Avogadro's number, about 6.022e+23.

So, a mole of copper is the amount of copper that contains 6.022e+23 atoms of copper (about 63.5 g). A mole of water contains 6.022+23 water molecules (18.016 g).
 
What Madalch said.

If an atom has an atomic mass of 1, a mole of that atom has a mass of 1 gram.

You don't generally get whole numbers, though, for two reasons:

1. If an element has multiple stable isotopes, the average atomic mass is the average of the masses of the isotopes times their relative frequency, and a mole is this something point something grams.

2. Atoms of different elements vary slightly in mass per subatomic particle due to the binding energy holding the nucleus together (a.k.a. "mass defect"). We arbitrarily set 12C at exactly 12, so other atoms have slightly more or slightly less mass than a count of their particles would suggest. So 4He, which on paper should have an atomic mass of 4, being exactly 1/3 of a 12C atom, instead turns out to have a mass of about 4.0026.
 
Not really a sceptical question, but does anyone have a simple definition of a mole, in chemistry for my daughter, who is very confused about what it means?

We've googled it but most of the definitions are complex (though correct, I'm sure) and difficult to understand for one who is just starting chemistry at this level and is struggling with basic concepts (and one (me!) who probably never fully grasped the concept and anyway hasn't done chemistry for very many years).

Thanks in advance,

Yuri

Tell your daughter to go here: http://www.moleday.org/ If her chemistry teacher does not mention same (or if he/she does) get one of the Tshirts (which doesn't matter, it is always the same time and day) and any other stuff that takes her fancy and impress him/her.
 
It is about ~6*10^23 of those bunched together :
220px-Talpa_europaea_MHNT.jpg


:p
 
A mole is a way to count things that are far too small to count. If you have a dozen eggs, you know you have 12 of them. If you have a mole of eggs, you know you have 602,200,000,000,000,000,000,000 of them. That's a uselessly huge number for everyday situations, but since atoms and molecules are so small, it works out well in chemistry. A mole of eggs would be larger than the entire solar system, but a mole of water molecules is around 18 grams of it, only slightly larger than a tablespoon.

Moles are used in chemistry because chemistry depends on having the right amounts of things that are hard to directly compare any other way. Say you want to turn oxygen (O) and hydrogen (H) into water (H2O). You know there are two atoms of hydrogen for every atom of oxygen in a water molecule. Say you assemble proportional masses of hydrogen and oxygen, something like 10 grams of hydrogen and 5 grams of oxygen. Once you react them, you'll find you only have 5.6 grams of water, not the 15 you'd expect. You'd also be left with 9.4 grams of hydrogen, completely unreacted. The reason for this is simple, oxygen is a lot bigger than hydrogen.

In that example, you've got 10 grams of hydrogen. The molar mass of hydrogen is 1.008 grams per mole, so you have 9.92 moles of hydrogen. The molar mass of oxygen on the other hand is 15.999 grams per mole, so you've only brought 0.31 moles of oxygen. When you make water, you need two dozen hydrogen atoms for every one dozen oxygen atoms to make one dozen water molecules. So, instead of having 20 dozen hydrogen atoms and 10 dozen oxygen atoms, you brought a dozen oxygen atoms and 32 dozen hydrogen atoms. You'll still only get a dozen water molecules, and the leftover 30 dozen hydrogen won't have anything to do.

Using moles though, it becomes easy. If we instead use 2 moles of hydrogen (2.016 grams) and a mole of oxygen (15.999 grams) we'll end up with 1 mole of water (18.016 grams) and nothing left over.

When you see a chemical equation, like "C3H8 + 5 O2 -> 3 CO2 + 4 H2O" you can read it as either atoms/molecules or moles. Either: "1 molecule of propane + 5 molecules of oxygen* yields 3 molecules of carbon dioxide and 4 molecules of water" or, "1 mole of propane (44 grams) + 4 moles of oxygen (160 grams) yields 3 moles of carbon dioxide (132 grams) + 4 moles of water (72 grams)." Both are true, the second one is merely the first scaled up 6.022*1023 times.








*The oxygen in the air around you is actually oxygen molecules (O2), not oxygen atoms (O). Each oxygen molecule is two atoms of oxygen bonded together. The same is true of hydrogen, (H2) but it didn't matter in the first example. I could have just as easily written "+ 10 O" instead of "+ 5 O2."
 
Last edited:
One of the great things about the idea behind/of moles Is that it made purchasing chemicals for producing other chemicals is that if you know the mass of the product you want to make and the mass of each chemical you need to put together to produce that mass then your inventory can be much more easily determined. As I point out to my students that discovery by itself makes knowing chemistry worth the effort - especially if you are going into an industry that uses chemicals to make other chemicals.

The other neat thing is that Avogadro did not come up with this out of the blue - he was reading the work of another scientist in a journal (equivalent) when he realized what that scientist's work meant and actually could be used for. And thus he got the naming rights and the fame....... The sad news is that the information about atoms and molecules he needed to come up with the actual number did not exist for some time after he died - but once it did and could be calculated that naming rights thing gave him it:):):) !
 
These are brilliant replies, even I now have a vague inkling of what it means. I can't see her signing up to International Mole Day somehow, maybe next year we'll be able to laugh about it, but things are a bit fraught for now. Excellent site though, I may get a T-shirt myself.

I'll show some of the replies to young Miss Nalyssus - this is a brilliant forum!

Many thanks folks,

Yuri
 
These are brilliant replies, even I now have a vague inkling of what it means. I can't see her signing up to International Mole Day somehow, maybe next year we'll be able to laugh about it, but things are a bit fraught for now. Excellent site though, I may get a T-shirt myself.

I'll show some of the replies to young Miss Nalyssus - this is a brilliant forum!

Many thanks folks,

Yuri

As some of the citations state, a mole was first defined as the number of atoms in 1 gram of hydrogen (the simplest element' atomic number = 1), which I think is easiest to understand. But it turns out that hydrogen doesn't weigh exactly 1 gram per mole in practice (just a bit off). So defining one mole as the number of atoms in 12 grams of carbon (atomic number equal 12) was more accurate in practice.
 
It's been well covered already, but another example won't hurt.

Consider Water
Formula is H2O
2 atoms of Hydrogen plus 1 atom of Oxygen make one molecule of water.

Quick and dirty gram formula weight is (2 x 1) + (1 X 16) = 18
So 18 grams is the weight of 6.02X10^23 molecules of water (1 mole).

Because Hydrogen and Oxygen have stable isotopes (See Pixymisa's post), their atomic weights are not quite 1 and 16.
In fact, they are more like 1.008 and 15.999, so a closer figure for the gram formula weight of water is
2 X 1.008 + 1 X 15.999
Which is 2.016 + 15.999, or 18.015

(The unit is the Dalton (da), but it is often expressed as grams per mole (g/mol).)

So 18.015 g/mol is the atomic mass (weight) of a single molecule of water.
18.015 grams of water, would contain 1 mole of water molecules- that's Avogadro's number, 6.02X10^23 molecules of water.
 
It is about ~6*10^23 of those bunched together :
[qimg]http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/ed/Talpa_europaea_MHNT.jpg/220px-Talpa_europaea_MHNT.jpg[/qimg]

:p

That photo reminds of the 'One Mole Solution' that one of the chemistry students made at my college a while back.

;)
 
Try the khan Academy: http://www.khanacademy.org/science/chemistry/

Covers all the basics with Avogadro being in the 4th topic. Note for many classes there are helping videos there from elementary school to early college in a number of areas (math and science being the ones they started with. All completely free to everyone (they get lots of private funding because they are real good!!!
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom