Brown
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2001
- Messages
- 12,984
It is amazing that television (e.g., CNN) and radio (e.g., public radio) still use terms like "developments from the Vatican" or "breaking news from the Vatican" and the like. WHAT developments? WHAT breaking news?
The pope is still dead, isn't he?
Weren't the post-death procedures mostly worked out in advance of his death? Wasn't the procedure for succession being described even before his passing? Isn't canonization years off?
The death of the pope is a big story, yes; but it hardly has the sort of rapid development of events that justifies announcements that regular reporting will be interrupted to bring the listener the most current news from the Vatican.
It also seems that one of the big "stories" of the past few days is that people have been praying for the pope. By what standard is that news?? Catholics pray for the pope routinely, even when he is in the best of health. When President Bush announces that he is praying for something, this is the equivalent of saying that he is doing nothing, except "making a wish."
To the extent that the prayers were for his recovery, such efforts were futile. To the extent that the prayers were for the passage of his immortal soul into heaven, those prayers are futile, too, aren't they? Once the pope passes, his "die is cast," so to speak, and if the Almighty deems him unsuited to enter the kingdom of heaven, then the prayers of those who did not know the man could hardly be given any weight. Isn't the real "news" here that millions of people are engaging in a completely futile activity, even measured by their own standards of theology?
The pope is still dead, isn't he?
Weren't the post-death procedures mostly worked out in advance of his death? Wasn't the procedure for succession being described even before his passing? Isn't canonization years off?
The death of the pope is a big story, yes; but it hardly has the sort of rapid development of events that justifies announcements that regular reporting will be interrupted to bring the listener the most current news from the Vatican.
It also seems that one of the big "stories" of the past few days is that people have been praying for the pope. By what standard is that news?? Catholics pray for the pope routinely, even when he is in the best of health. When President Bush announces that he is praying for something, this is the equivalent of saying that he is doing nothing, except "making a wish."
To the extent that the prayers were for his recovery, such efforts were futile. To the extent that the prayers were for the passage of his immortal soul into heaven, those prayers are futile, too, aren't they? Once the pope passes, his "die is cast," so to speak, and if the Almighty deems him unsuited to enter the kingdom of heaven, then the prayers of those who did not know the man could hardly be given any weight. Isn't the real "news" here that millions of people are engaging in a completely futile activity, even measured by their own standards of theology?