We need to send jews to Sudan

zenith-nadir

Illuminator
Joined
Feb 3, 2004
Messages
4,482
We need to send Jews to Sudan, perhaps then the UN, specifically the Security Council, would become interested...


From: Sudanese tell of mass rape - BBC - Thursday, 10 June, 2004, 07:03 GMT 08:03 UK
The pro-government Janjaweed Arab militia has been accused of using systematic rape, as well as killing and destroying the villages of black Africans, in the conflict in Sudan's western Darfur region.

"The Janjaweed arrived one evening in February in our village near Kaileck, they had guns," she says in a quiet voice. "They separated men and women. Then the Janjaweed selected the prettiest women." "Four men raped me for 10 days." Men were also picked up daily and killed.

"It is very difficult for me as I am a Fur women and these are Arab men", says Khadija, covering herself with an orange scarf. "These are my only clothes. My sister gave them to me, because the Janjaweed abandoned me naked."

Kaileck is now an empty desolated town, with every single house and hut burnt or destroyed.

From:Big powers wary over Sudan crisis - BBC - Saturday, 8 May, 2004, 00:26 GMT 01:26 UK
The UN will take no immediate action in the troubled Darfur region of western Sudan, Security Council members say.
 
22 March 2004 - Grandfather of all suicide bombers, (men, women AND children), Sheikh Yassin is killed by Israel.

25 March 2004 - The United States yesterday vetoed a Security Council resolution condemning Israel's assassination of Palestinian cleric Sheik Ahmed Yassin.

See? We need to send jews to Sudan....;)
 
Shock horror, the UN is hamstrung by large nations who can see abolutely nothing to benefit them in the situation. I'm sure the permanent members of the security council don't give a toss about Sudan. They're far too pre-ocupied with the wars (diplomatic and actual) they've started over the past couple of years.
 
Cleopatra said:
Now let's see who will bite the troll bait here...
I alway marvel at people who "cry troll" with their own trollish posts. Amazing hypocrisy... :rolleyes:
Originally posted by BillyTK
But why would the UN want to act against a secular government involved in suppressing muslim rebellion?
The events in Dafur are seperate from the civil war between the Sudanese government and the Sudan People's Liberation Movement/Army. The Sudanese government began mobilising an Arab militia - the Janjaweed - to ethnically cleanse the Dafur region of non-muslims under the guise of tackling the Sudan People's Liberation Movement insurrection.

Meanwhile at the UN...U.N. prepares for Sudan advance team - UPI - June 11 2004
UNITED NATIONS, June 11 (UPI) -- The U.N. Security Council Friday decided to send an advance team to Sudan ahead of a planned political mission as expectations rise over a peace deal.

In a unanimous vote, the panel's 15 members approved a resolution saying they were ready to consider U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan's proposal to create a U.N. support operation to help implement a comprehensive peace agreement in Sudan.
 
I would ask you to go fucck yourself but then I am not interested in wishing nice things to people that I am not so fond of.
 
Cleopatra said:
I would ask you to go fucck yourself but then I am not interested in wishing nice things to people that I am not so fond of.
be calm cleo...

ZN just does not understand how the UN works, he never has. It doesn't matter how many times you point out to him that the UN cannot make a resolution directed at a militia group....any more than it could make a resolution directed at the boy scouts of america....

If this was a government taking this action then a resolution would be possible.....But its a waste of time pointing this out to him for the tenth time.
 
Cleopatra said:
I would ask you to go fucck yourself but then I am not interested in wishing nice things to people that I am not so fond of.

:eek:
 
Cleopatra:
"I would ask you to go fucck yourself but then I am not interested in wishing nice things to people that I am not so fond of."

Wow, Cleopatra comin` at ya :c1:
 
The Fool said:

be calm cleo...

ZN just does not understand how the UN works, he never has. It doesn't matter how many times you point out to him that the UN cannot make a resolution directed at a militia group....any more than it could make a resolution directed at the boy scouts of america....

If this was a government taking this action then a resolution would be possible.....But its a waste of time pointing this out to him for the tenth time.

In the case of the 2002 hostage-taking crisis in Moscow, the Security Council adopted a resolution condemning the terrorist attack within 24 hours. In the case of the bombing in Bali the Security Council adopted a resolution within 48 hours. These actions were not taken by any government.
In 2002, the General Assembly passed a resolution on Palestinian children -- the only children in the world subject to the specific concern of a General Assembly resolution. Never mind that Palestinian terrorists have repeatedly targeted Israeli children
 
If Z-N got offended for my NOT asking him to FuccK off I can always correct that and I can actually ask him to go fuccck himself off.

Fucck off Z-N.

I apologize for not asking you to do so last night. :)

Somebody must inform you Z-N that the people of Israel are called Israelis and not Jews and you had better stop attempting to pass this dirty propaganda that uses the term Jews when talking about Israelis.

If you don't know the difference and its significance when you talk about Israel and the Middle East crisis you'd better leave this discussions to the older children.
 
Originally posted by celter
In the case of the 2002 hostage-taking crisis in Moscow, the Security Council adopted a resolution condemning the terrorist attack within 24 hours. In the case of the bombing in Bali the Security Council adopted a resolution within 48 hours. These actions were not taken by any government.
In 2002, the General Assembly passed a resolution on Palestinian children -- the only children in the world subject to the specific concern of a General Assembly resolution. Never mind that Palestinian terrorists have repeatedly targeted Israeli children

Ah, but do you remember what happened to an almost identical resolution on Israeli children?
 
Cleopatra said:
So,what is your point Mycroft? Since when Israel cares about what UN thinks?

There is a difference between not caring about what the UN thinks and not heeding the dictates of an obviously biased and hostile UN. It is my opinion that if the UN were more fair to Israel, that the UN could become a force for resolving this conflict.

Call me an optimist. :)
 
No things are not exactly like that because Israel through USA has boycotted many fair resolutions that concerned the Palestinians.

It's an hypocricy to lament for UN's bias towards Israel.

The only thing that UN's stance regarding Israel proves is that there is no such a thing as an international jewish lobby that controls everything.

If this lobby existed they would control UN as well, the rest are funny stories.
 
Cleopatra said:
No things are not exactly like that because Israel through USA has boycotted many fair resolutions that concerned the Palestinians.

It's an hypocricy to lament for UN's bias towards Israel.

The only thing that UN's stance regarding Israel proves is that there is no such a thing as an international jewish lobby that controls everything.

If this lobby existed they would control UN as well, the rest are funny stories.

The International Jewish Lobby is a work in progress. They control the United States, but haven't been able to subvert the UN yet. If you read the newsletter, you would know this.
 

Back
Top Bottom