• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Video rebuttal of BBC conspiracy files

I stopped watching when they got to the BBC intro with the steel in the hanger, and the rebuttal proceeded to show lots of pictures of the columns with the cuts the recovery workers made to break them into manageable lengths.

That was 1 minute into it.

-Gumboot
 
A recycling of the same stupid claims and idiotic comparisons that twoofers are famous for.

"But the building in Madrid didn't collapse!"

Brilliant.

It's been a rough week for da twoofers. First the BBC show, then the "smoking gun" of yesterday....now this sorry "debunking" effort.
 
They make a very interesting point:

The BBC at the start of this documentary says there are over 50 different conspiracy theories regarding911. They then proceed to spend 2.5 minutes of this 60 minute show talking about Dylan's house and laptop.
 
The two NORAD tapes played together to create an air of confusion is very damning to the BBC.
 
Aphelion said:
They make a very interesting point:

The BBC at the start of this documentary says there are over 50 different conspiracy theories regarding911. They then proceed to spend 2.5 minutes of this 60 minute show talking about Dylan's house and laptop.
Click to expand...


They're right, BBC should have spent 1.2 minutes on each conspiracy.
 
Aphelion said:
They make a very interesting point:

The BBC at the start of this documentary says there are over 50 different conspiracy theories regarding911. They then proceed to spend 2.5 minutes of this 60 minute show talking about Dylan's house and laptop.
Click to expand...

You twoofers always play this game.

Tear apart the most popular claims and the answer is never: "OK, that claim is rubbish."

Instead it's always: "oh yeah? Well what about this one?"
 
gumboot said:
I stopped watching when they got to the BBC intro with the steel in the hanger, and the rebuttal proceeded to show lots of pictures of the columns with the cuts the recovery workers made to break them into manageable lengths.

That was 1 minute into it.

-Gumboot
Click to expand...

LMAO same spot I stopped... I can't believe that "cut columns" doesn't click for these people... um, it was CUT- as in CLEAN UP.

It has to be one of the silliest claims I've ever seen.
 
Aphelion said:
They make a very interesting point:

The BBC at the start of this documentary says there are over 50 different conspiracy theories regarding911. They then proceed to spend 2.5 minutes of this 60 minute show talking about Dylan's house and laptop.
Click to expand...

You really have no idea what a good documentary film is. If they didn't introduce him, over half the audience would wonder who the hell he was. He's only famous in the CT community, everywhere else he's a film school reject.
 
Totovader said:
LMAO same spot I stopped... I can't believe that "cut columns" doesn't click for these people... um, it was CUT- as in CLEAN UP.

It has to be one of the silliest claims I've ever seen.
Click to expand...


Did you stop watching the BBC video when they showed the erroneous graphic and said that the collapse was a pancake collapse? Does one false claim negate this entire video?
 
Aphelion said:
Did you stop watching the BBC video when they showed the erroneous graphic and said that the collapse was a pancake collapse? Does one false claim negate this entire video?
Click to expand...

How many stupid claims are we supposed to tolerate before we write it off as BS?
 
CptColumbo said:
You really have no idea what a good documentary film is. If they didn't introduce him, over half the audience would wonder who the hell he was. He's only famous in the CT community, everywhere else he's a film school reject.
Click to expand...

As already discussed, the CBC video was a good documentary and it didn't need to show guided tours of Jim Fetzers house.

Still waiting for specific examples of bias in the CBC piece.
 
Aphelion said:
Please point out all the stupid claims.
Click to expand...

I skimmed it and caught

- WTC welding clean up work as proof of a demolition

- it brings up the Madrid fire (building had a concrete core and the steel portion DID collapse)

- it doesn't even touch the Pentagon cuz it's "divided most members of the movement." In other words, it's a powerful indicator of how out to lunch the movement is.

- it's doesn't touch Flight 93 cuz it's "not key to understanding 9/11."

- it brings up "hijackers are still alive" claim (one of the most moronic claims out there).

So it "debunked" most of the BBC report by IGNORING IT! Pathetic even by twoofer standards.

C'mon, Aphelion. What sort of Mickey Mouse debunking is this? :confused:
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom