Video of other collapses?

carlitos

"más divertido"
carlitos
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
24,384
Location
USA! USA!
I made this point in another thread but it's probably going to get lost.


carlitos said:
I'm just curious. Is there any video of the other collapses? Maybe if we find one, we can "analyze" the film for anomalies and start a whole new truthy meme on our own.
Click to expand...


From our friends at wikipedia:

Along with the 110-floor Twin Towers, numerous other buildings at the World Trade Center site were destroyed or badly damaged, including WTC buildings 3 through 7 and St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church.[68] The North Tower, South Tower, the Marriott Hotel (3 WTC) and 7 WTC were completely destroyed. The U.S. Customs House (6 World Trade Center), 4 World Trade Center, 5 World Trade Center, and both pedestrian bridges connecting buildings were severely damaged. The Deutsche Bank Building on 130 Liberty Street was partially damaged and demolished later.[69][70] The two buildings of the World Financial Center also suffered damage.[69]
Click to expand...

Is there any video of the other buildings being visibly damaged or destroyed? I would like to conceive a conspiracy theory about the other buildings as a social experiment.
 
It's happening already. Judy Wood and others are quite interested in WTC 6.
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/080229AfdJWRFC316ExA4-59-10.pdf
There's also growing interest in the building amoung the nuclear bomb crowd.

More significant for me seems to be the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church. I have never heard of this one. I'd like to know why it was destroyed? Is this part of the smoking gun that points to Mossad?
 
in the BBC documentary 'the Third Tower' there is a segment which looks at the failure of wtc5 and compares it to wtc7 :

Begins around 52 minutes -

 
Scott Sommers said:
It's happening already. Judy Wood and others are quite interested in WTC 6.
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/080229AfdJWRFC316ExA4-59-10.pdf
There's also growing interest in the building amoung the nuclear bomb crowd.
Click to expand...
Thanks. I like how she calls the steel "wheatchex."

cjnewson88 said:
in the BBC documentary 'the Third Tower' there is a segment which looks at the failure of wtc5 and compares it to wtc7 :

Begins around 52 minutes -

Click to expand...
Thanks for that (except that I had to hear Richard Gage speak). Looks like I'm out of luck on video though; we just have still photos of the other partial collapses.
 
carlitos said:
Thanks. I like how she calls the steel "wheatchex."


Thanks for that (except that I had to hear Richard Gage speak). Looks like I'm out of luck on video though; we just have still photos of the other partial collapses.
Click to expand...

If you're looking for video specifically of the surrounding buildings I doubt you'll find it. From the air most of the focus was on the towers and the dust often obscured what was happening to adjacent buildings or the video angle left the sides affected by debris impacts obscured. Most people filming from the ground nearby were running for cover and very likely didn't have time to think about filming the other buildings. Heck, even WTC 7's collapse video was accidental in most cases.
 
Grizzly Bear said:
If you're looking for video specifically of the surrounding buildings I doubt you'll find it. From the air most of the focus was on the towers and the dust often obscured what was happening to adjacent buildings or the video angle left the sides affected by debris impacts obscured. Most people filming from the ground nearby were running for cover and very likely didn't have time to think about filming the other buildings. Heck, even WTC 7's collapse video was accidental in most cases.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I know. I just think that there is something about that video of "building 7" (the Salomon Brothers building) and the two towers that is so powerful, it affects people's minds to the point that they buy into conspiracies. If I had video of another collapse, I'm pretty sure I could mine it for anomalies and create a whole new conspiracy. The JFK guys do the same with still photos, but there is still the Zapruder film that got them going from the start.
 
Scott Sommers said:
It's happening already. Judy Wood and others are quite interested in WTC 6.
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/080229AfdJWRFC316ExA4-59-10.pdf
There's also growing interest in the building amoung the nuclear bomb crowd.

More significant for me seems to be the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church. I have never heard of this one. I'd like to know why it was destroyed? Is this part of the smoking gun that points to Mossad?
Click to expand...

The elimination of the church was the whole point of the plot. The towers were merely the camouflage to hide the wanton destruction of a major Christian Church. :eye-poppi
 
Grizzly Bear said:
If you're looking for video specifically of the surrounding buildings I doubt you'll find it. From the air most of the focus was on the towers and the dust often obscured what was happening to adjacent buildings or the video angle left the sides affected by debris impacts obscured. Most people filming from the ground nearby were running for cover and very likely didn't have time to think about filming the other buildings. Heck, even WTC 7's collapse video was accidental in most cases.
Click to expand...

Those who weren't running had to be in on it so we can discount all the videos that I don't like right off the bat.
 
Scott Sommers said:
It's happening already. Judy Wood and others are quite interested in WTC 6.
http://drjudywood.com/pdf/080229AfdJWRFC316ExA4-59-10.pdf
There's also growing interest in the building amoung the nuclear bomb crowd.

More significant for me seems to be the St. Nicholas Greek Orthodox Church. I have never heard of this one. I'd like to know why it was destroyed? Is this part of the smoking gun that points to Mossad?
Click to expand...

It was a tiny church in the shadow of the South Tower.
 
Carlitos, none of the other buildings anywhere in or near the complex "progressive"-ly collapsed. They were obviously and visibly damaged by debris from the towers and some fires. They had to be torn down. They didn't plummet to the ground on their own, from the destabilization that their structures suffered. To any intelligent person, this only highlights the improbability of WTC 1, 2 and 7's "collapses". You apparently don't even understand, after ten years, why so many were puzzled by the the towers' collapses.

WTC 3
 
Last edited:
ergo said:
Carlitos, none of the other buildings anywhere in or near the complex "progressive"-ly collapsed. They were obviously and visibly damaged by debris from the towers and some fires. They had to be torn down. They didn't plummet to the ground on their own, from the destabilization that their structures suffered. To any intelligent person, this only highlights the improbability of WTC 1, 2 and 7's "collapses". You apparently don't even understand, after ten years, why so many were puzzled by the the towers' collapses.
Click to expand...

So you come up with a theory of something that has never been done before, because you can't believe something happened because you don't think it ever has ever happened before?
 
ergo said:
Carlitos, none of the other buildings anywhere in or near the complex "progressive"-ly collapsed. They were obviously and visibly damaged by debris from the towers and some fires. They had to be torn down. They didn't plummet to the ground on their own, from the destabilization that their structures suffered. To any intelligent person, this only highlights the improbability of WTC 1, 2 and 7's "collapses". You apparently don't even understand, after ten years, why so many were puzzled by the the towers' collapses.

WTC 3
Click to expand...

And how many of them were anything like WTC 1, 2 or 7? answer none. So why would you think the collapses would be similar?:confused:

People (including me) were puzzled because we were ignorant. I educated myself on the buildings construction and puzzlement ended. You apparently are ineducable.:rolleyes:
 
ergo said:
Carlitos, none of the other buildings anywhere in or near the complex "progressive"-ly collapsed. They were obviously and visibly damaged by debris from the towers and some fires. They had to be torn down. They didn't plummet to the ground on their own, from the destabilization that their structures suffered. To any intelligent person, this only highlights the improbability of WTC 1, 2 and 7's "collapses". You apparently don't even understand, after ten years, why so many were puzzled by the the towers' collapses.

WTC 3
Click to expand...

LOL wrong as usual
 
ergo said:
Carlitos, none of the other buildings anywhere in or near the complex "progressive"-ly collapsed. They were obviously and visibly damaged by debris from the towers and some fires. They had to be torn down. They didn't plummet to the ground on their own, from the destabilization that their structures suffered. To any intelligent person, this only highlights the improbability of WTC 1, 2 and 7's "collapses". You apparently don't even understand, after ten years, why so many were puzzled by the the towers' collapses.

WTC 3
Click to expand...

Too funny.

Not a word for weeks, I mention your name and "poof" there you are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom