Verifiable, OBJECTIVE evidence of explosives

Arkan_Wolfshade

Philosopher
A
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
7,154
If you've got it, post it here. I reiterate OBJECTIVE evidence only, and remember; explosives cause explosions, but not all explosions are caused by explosives. I await the evidence.
 
Removed inappropriate link.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Lisa Simpson

She's looking!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm providing the opportunity for people like Russell to present their case. The only qualifier I have is that it can't be subjective, anecdotal evidence.
 
Here is evidence

On these pages are a wealth a photographic evidence, showing clearly that the towers were blown to kingdom come. That is, there is very little left of them. Please bring your evidence that they "collpased" and "fell down". I see no evidence of that. While you're at it, offer explanations about the melted cars and the blown out windows.


http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam1.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam2.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam3.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam4.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam6.html
 
(the sound of crickets chirping...if indeed crickets do chirp...though I always thought cricket was a game...ahhh the smell of leather on willow...small boys playing football, jackets for goalposts....ahem)
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
If you've got it, post it here. I reiterate OBJECTIVE evidence only, and remember; explosives cause explosions, but not all explosions are caused by explosives. I await the evidence.
Click to expand...

Isn´t the conrete core evidence enough for the C4? :confused:
 
I agree TS this is some of the best evidence you have presented.

Image108a.jpg


from http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam1.html
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
I'm providing the opportunity for people like Russell to present their case. The only qualifier I have is that it can't be subjective, anecdotal evidence.
Click to expand...

has there already been a study on the velocity of the air streams coming out of the windows as the WTC fails?

Better have that ready for the "squids" coming your way. Not sure why they have octopi like creatures in the WTC, and all those "squids" going off.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
On these pages are a wealth a photographic evidence, showing clearly that the towers were blown to kingdom come. That is, there is very little left of them. ... I see no evidence of that. While you're at it, offer explanations about the melted cars and the blown out windows.


http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam1.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam2.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam3.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam4.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html
http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam6.html
Click to expand...

Subjective interpretation of photos is not objective verifiable evidence. If there is something specific from Woods' site that you feel meets this criteria please provide it specifically.

TruthSeeker1234 said:
Please bring your evidence that they "collpased" and "fell down".
Click to expand...
I did not start this thread to discuss alternative explanations. I started this thread to discuss verifiable, objective evidence of explosives being used at WTC (1, 2, and/or 7). Please stay on topic.
 
firecoins - it was common knowledge; the most common source of 9/11 CT information. I had forgot

that is exactly where janedoe hides all her information on the beam weapon
 
Arkan, please state which photographs or videos have been altered. Unaltered photgraphs and videos are not only evidence, they are the best evidence.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
On these pages are a wealth a photographic evidence, showing clearly that the towers were blown to kingdom come. That is, there is very little left of them. Please bring your evidence that they "collpased" and "fell down". I see no evidence of that. While you're at it, offer explanations about the melted cars and the blown out windows.
Click to expand...

I thought you were no longer supporting the "explosives" options, so why are you even posting here?

TruthSeeker1234 said:
Explosives heard? Plenty of them were heard at various times. The lack of a definitive "crack" at the beginning of the "collapse" may well be explained by high energy weapons, as suggested by Wood and Reynolds.

In fact, as I think about it, the star wars beam solution answers a number of questions.
Click to expand...
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
On these pages are a wealth a photographic evidence, showing clearly that the towers were blown to kingdom come. That is, there is very little left of them. Please bring your evidence that they "collpased" and "fell down". I see no evidence of that. While you're at it, offer explanations about the melted cars and the blown out windows.
Click to expand...

TruthSeeker1234, I blew your explosives theory to kingdom come in this post, shortly before you fled from yet another of your own threads. Since you like photographs and video, preferring them to all other forms of investigation, you will be pleased to find that my post there contains both pictures and video. The difference between them and the WTC collapses is "shown clearly."

ETA: Never mind, he's going on about Star Wars weapons again. I tackled that yesterday, at the end of this post.

Additionally, I answered your questions about the smoke and dust cloud created here, also with no response from you.

Please read and understand these points before posting out of turn again. It grows tedious.
 
Last edited:
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Arkan, please state which photographs or videos have been altered. Unaltered photgraphs and videos are not only evidence, they are the best evidence.
Click to expand...

No, finding explosive residue on the debris would be better evidence. Pictures of explosives placed in the WTC prior to the 9-11 attacks, would be better evidence.

Subjective interpretation of photos from outside, during the collapse, is very poor evidence.
 
TruthSeeker1234 said:
Arkan, please state which photographs or videos have been altered. Unaltered photgraphs and videos are not only evidence, they are the best evidence.
Click to expand...

I made no claim as to the authenticity, or veracity, of the photographs. Please do not put words in my mouth. Subjective interpretation of photographic, and video evidence is not, by definition, objective. If there has been scientific analysis of the photos, that can be independently verified and meets the criteria of objectivity then please present it (example: a photo showing a piece of det-cord lying in the rubble immediately after collapse)
 
Here's an example of a photo as scientific evidence

Bowing.jpg


In this picture, the bowing of the south face of the North Tower is made manifest. A grid has been placed over the face, showing you where the face of the building should be. Small lines illustrate just how far away some perimeter columns are from where they should be (the furthest shown is 55 pixels of displacement, which equals 75 inches in this picture - or over six feet).

Between you and me, I don't need any explosives to explain why a building with over six feet of inward bowing might have collapsed.
 
:bump1

Yes, I'm bumping this thread. I'd like to have some discussion of evidence that is not open to interpretation, or is subjective in nature. I feel this is important.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom