Verifiable, OBJECTIVE evidence flight 93 was shot down

Arkan_Wolfshade

Philosopher
A
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
7,154
If you've got it, post it here. I reiterate OBJECTIVE evidence only. I am not interested in motive, whether it was ordered, etc. I am only interested in verfiable, objective evidence that supports the assertion that Flight 93 was shot down. I await the evidence.
 
Arkan_Wolfshade said:
If you've got it, post it here. I reiterate OBJECTIVE evidence only. I am not interested in motive, whether it was ordered, etc. I am only interested in verfiable, objective evidence that supports the assertion that Flight 93 was shot down. I await the evidence.
Click to expand...

Well to my knowledge Rumsfeld and a Military air traffic controller in separate interviews slipped up and said it was shot down. Oh and a general named the person who shot it down.
 
jessicarabbit said:
Well to my knowledge Rumsfeld and a Military air traffic controller in separate interviews slipped up and said it was shot down. Oh and a general named the person who shot it down.
Click to expand...

To be honest I don't think it matters. It isn't part of the conspiracy. If they shot it down they did a good job in my opinion. Doesn't prove anything either way.
 
Well to my knowledge Rumsfeld and a Military air traffic controller in separate interviews slipped up and said it was shot down. Oh and a general named the person who shot it down.
Click to expand...
"I think the conspirators are stupid beyond belief" isn't objective evidence. At the very least, these "slips" need to be put into context.

Also, haven't you said several times that you believe flight 93 crashed?
 
Last edited:
Housefly said:
"I think the conspirators are stupid beyond belief" isn't objective evidence. At the very least, these "slips" need to be out into context.

Also, haven't you said several times that you believe flight 93 crashed?
Click to expand...

I do believe it crashed, I dont know what precipitated the crash though.
 
Never having seen the output of a Flight Data Recorder can someone tell me what they can and can't monitor? It would seem to me that if it tracks both Altitude and major systems like engine failures it would be easy to determine shotdown or not.

If the Engines and such failed at ground level, it's pretty safe to assume that the impact was what caused the failure. If the plane was still at cruising altitude when the engines failed, then it would be more likely it was shot down.

Do we know wich it was?

Trifikas
 
jessicarabbit said:
I dont know what precipitated the crash though.
Click to expand...

Have you just not researched it at all or are you willfully ignoring the overwhelming evidence that it crashed during an attempt by the passengers to retake it from the hijackers?
 
mortimer said:
Have you just not researched it at all or are you willfully ignoring the overwhelming evidence that it crashed during an attempt by the passengers to retake it from the hijackers?
Click to expand...

Could you point me to that overwhelming evidence please?
 
In the "what if the towers stood" thread
I believe flight 93 crashed as stated.
Click to expand...
In the "conspiracy theorists" thread:
Flight 77 hit the pentagon. 93 crashed in shanksville.
Click to expand...
So why are you now talking about people slipping up and admitting it was shot down?
 
Housefly said:
In the "what if the towers stood" threadIn the "conspiracy theorists" thread:So why are you now talking about people slipping up and admitting it was shot down?
Click to expand...

Its just the evidence I have heard. I believe it hit the ground in shanksville, I dont know why it crashed. I was making the point in other threads that I don't believe it went to cleveland and disappeared.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom