• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

US Patent no. 6,485,773

I'm sure if they hired a few porn stars for a double-blind teste test, they would have no trouble finding male volunteers for the study. I bet that wouldn't even count as prostitution.

I'm starting to see a possible business opportunity here...


Dr. Stupid
 
Stimpson J. Cat said:
I'm sure if they hired a few porn stars for a double-blind teste test, they would have no trouble finding male volunteers for the study. I bet that wouldn't even count as prostitution.

I'm starting to see a possible business opportunity here...


Dr. Stupid

All quiet on the German front? :wink:
 
Diamond said:
How did they test this? How did the examiner know whether the invention was effective?

http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-...0&s1=6485773.WKU.&OS=PN/6485773&RS=PN/6485773

From the link -
Following this, marketing testing began with 27 local couples of different ages, races, and health regimens (e.g. smokers/non-smokers, drinkers/non-drinkers, healthy/not-so-healthy lifestyles and diets). Questionnaires were created and used for data collection by said couples and, after several months, the data was examined. The results were highly positive, clearly indicating that regardless of the lifestyles of the couples, significant semen-taste improvement was experienced by all in the market-test group. Subsequent to this, the product was placed on the market where after thousands of orders and with a 100% Money-back Guarantee, less than 1.5% return of product has been experienced.
... Man to woman, "Only another six batches to try today, darling!"
 
Diamond said:
How did they test this? How did the examiner know whether the invention was effective?
Why would the examiner care? Think how unnecesarily expensive it would be to test all inventions for which patents are applied, especially considering that very few will ever reach commercial viability. It makes much more sense to have the inspector just make sure that the application is correctly made, and makes some sort of sense, and that the invention doesn't violate an already existing patent. A patent doesn't mean something works, it just means no one else can make commercial use of the idea.
 
Re: Re: US Patent no. 6,485,773

Michael Redman said:
A patent doesn't mean something works, it just means no one else can make commercial use of the idea.

Isn't this Randi's point? There are now people investing in perpetual motion machines and quackery of all kinds because of a patent being granted.
 
Those people are fools. You should do your homework before investing in anything. And the scammers should be punished for implying that the issuance of the patent is an endorsement of the functionality of the invention.
 
Its a unique form of medicine- the guy takes the pill and the girl gets a shot.

Sorry, very tasteless. But seriously, the guy freeze dries the ingredients? Why? Dehydrating the fruit would be a lot cheaper. Whatever, the thing is a crock anyway. If you take the pill, and eat 99% of your diet other foods, this will not make any difference. Alsol, once again, there is no quality control. One pill will be different from the next.
 
From the U.S. PTO link:
Following this, marketing testing began with 27 local couples of different ages, races, and health regimens (e.g. smokers/non-smokers, drinkers/non-drinkers, healthy/not-so-healthy lifestyles and diets). Questionnaires were created and used for data collection by said couples and, after several months, the data was examined. The results were highly positive, clearly indicating that regardless of the lifestyles of the couples, significant semen-taste improvement was experienced by all in the market-test group.
*cough* placebo effect *cough*
 

Back
Top Bottom