U.S. Goverment Healthcare Fraud

So far, all we know is:
  1. You haven't specified which laws have been broken or offences committed.
  2. You haven't shown evidence of a crime that pertains to those laws.
  3. You don't appear to have shown any evidence to a lawyer and sought their opinion.
  4. You continue to insist there was a crime you claim happened.
  5. Your former employer and government legal organisations apparently said there is nothing to action.
  6. You are here to discuss your claims, still without completing the above steps.
  7. You keep saying you will produce all the evidence...eventually...but haven't yet.
Sounds like you are developing a script or novel, not seeking justice. Unless you want to address any of the above points?
 
Renaissance said:
@Norman Alexander I am here to present evidence and reasoning and to have that evidence and reasoning critically and honestly examined. I am perfectly content with the null hypothesis being that what I say has not occurred. I am of the belief that, on most line items, I can move most of those who honestly engage past the 95% mark.

Every single person who has looked at a substantial portion of my evidence has agreed with me 100%, that what I say has definitely occurred.

Such people are not many in number, and this is also a preoccupation of mine that I almost never tire of talking about.

It is largely a symptom of my ptsd and my tendency to perseverate also plays a small role. I am autistic.
Click to expand...
HAVE YOU TAKEN YOUR EVIDENCE TO A LAWYER? They are the FIRST people to advise you in anything legal.
 
Renaissance said:
@theprestige that’s not correct my friend. As you will see, the crimes of Wells Fargo were initially an attempt to cover up the privacy violation. The crimes that involve the government are for the purposes of covering up Wells Fargo’s crimes.

A cover up of someone’s crimes makes no sense unless that person or corporation committed crimes. Further, the severity of the crimes is also a factor.

Had I been victimized with a single misdemeanor, it would really beg the question as to why would the government even bother with a cover-up. That is why I must first establish the crimes first.
Click to expand...
We can easily stipulate the victimization, if you can demonstrate the cover up.

Cut to the chase.
 
Renaissance said:
@junkshop I want it critically examined, which is the process of debunking anything. There is no such thing as a conspiracy theorist who does not wish for others to see the truth of his claims. This is no matter if they are really true or just perceived as true. I am no different.

The term conspiracy theory, applied to my claims, is the characterization of others. I defer to them, even as I personally disagree.

To me, I make a claim that I have been subjected to crimes and that some of those crimes are sponsored by the U.S. government, with the aim being to cover-up crimes committed against me by a wall street bank.

If I say that crimes have occurred, is that a conspiracy? The answer seems to be an obvious no, but I again defer. If people want to call it a conspiracy theory, I’m happy to speak with them on their terms.
Click to expand...
OK, now support your claim with evidence.

Show us the crime. Show us the cover-up. Show us that the alleged cover-up was also a crime.
 
Well, any way the eventual evidence points, you seem like an affable person to talk to, and I and I'm sure others here gladly welcome you. This forum enjoys forthrightness though. My advice is, avoid beating around the bush if you value your existing benefit of the doubt.
 
@theprestige I have lived and breathed this fight for over 5 years. It has consumed nearly every useable hour that I have available for that entire time. I know my case better than you do. I know how to prove it. I am the prosecutor. You are the jury. It is my case to make. Just trust me. With that said, the frameworks you have laid out have thus far been very useful. From here, however, I need to take the lead.

@theprestige, @junkshop, @arthwollipot, @Lithrael you are all going to have to give me time. I am disabled with a lot on my plate. Putting this together in a succinct way is hard as well. Just stay tuned. I will have you some stuff.

@Lithrael I am a gentleman almost always.
 
Renaissance said:
@Norman Alexander I am here to present evidence and reasoning and to have that evidence and reasoning critically and honestly examined. I am perfectly content with the null hypothesis being that what I say has not occurred. I am of the belief that, on most line items, I can move most of those who honestly engage past the 95% mark.

Every single person who has looked at a substantial portion of my evidence has agreed with me 100%, that what I say has definitely occurred.

Such people are not many in number, and this is also a preoccupation of mine that I almost never tire of talking about.

It is largely a symptom of my ptsd and my tendency to perseverate also plays a small role. I am autistic.
Click to expand...
So you have not presented this "evidence" to a lawyer. Which suggests to me you really don't think you have any case at all.
 
Renaissance said:
@theprestige I have lived and breathed this fight for over 5 years. It has consumed nearly every useable hour that I have available for that entire time. I know my case better than you do. I know how to prove it. I am the prosecutor. You are the jury. It is my case to make. Just trust me. With that said, the frameworks you have laid out have thus far been very useful. From here, however, I need to take the lead.

@theprestige, @junkshop, @arthwollipot, @Lithrael you are all going to have to give me time. I am disabled with a lot on my plate. Putting this together in a succinct way is hard as well. Just stay tuned. I will have you some stuff.

@Lithrael I am a gentleman almost always.
Click to expand...
You could help yourself and your case a great deal more by not pissing about here on this forum asking for our help. You would do MUCH BETTER by taking your case to a lawyer. There's plenty of them about who will take on worthy cases pro bono (for free).
 
I'm kind of stuck on the thread title, where's the health care fraud exactly? Also, if there really is a series of crimes, find a lawyer who will take your case for a cut of whatever civil settlement you can get. But to be honest, I'm not seeing an actual crime. Looking someone up on facebook is intrusive, not sure it's a crime. If its a solid case, you should find one that will take it on contingency.

Regarding WF's HR, yes they work for Wells Fargo but they're primary goal is not getting sued. If they thought you were in the right, they'd protect Wells Fargo by punishing you're supervisor and coworker not by covering it up. Why would they be more loyal to your supervisor than to Wells Fargo?
 
Renaissance said:
1. A senior manager at Wells Fargo, who had problems with me, put my former coworker, named Jenny, up to “inquiring about my past” behind my back.
...
4. As *part* of my evidence, I give the snippets from the chat where Courtney admits it to me that Jenny inquired about my past.
Click to expand...
Do you have evidence that the manager instructed the former coworker to investigate you, or do you only have those messages in which they appear to accept it happened?
 
Rena, the crew here us giving you good advice. If you really have a solid case of something a good lawyer would help you.

Postíng on public forums the details of the case or getting advice from the non-lawyer peanut gallery is the WORST thing to do your possible case. Any lawyer will tell you that. But, as you have made the documents you created public access here, it's a bit late.

If that good lawyer sees all your paperwork, studies it and then tells you have nothing believe him. He won't risk his practice on a bad case.
He isn't part of the conspiracy or somehow sold to WF or the DOJ.
Sharks love fat juicy prey. Is that really what you offer?

Of all you can do it's apparent that being clear and concise isn't part of your skill set. It should be. One clear page could possibly sumarise at least 30 pages of your documents. Maybe work on that.
 
Yeah you'll be wasting your time if your intention is to build up history or goodwill before you start laying out your actual case. This forum wants facts to look at, 'stuff in general' and prologues to your story will get you a page or two of engagement and then it will die. We'll ask you for the facts but we mostly won't beg.
 
@Jack by the hedge if you read that chat, in context, Courtney does not “accept” that it happened, she tells me what *did* happen, without me asking or saying anything about someone “inquiring about my past”. And yes, this senior manager had been using Jenny to manage the situation with me for some time before this. He is the obvious source of this. I don’t want to spend much time on the privacy violation, as the eventual crimes that unfold make it obvious that Wells Fargo has a massive liability related to this.
 
Renaissance said:
@Jack by the hedge if you read that chat, in context, Courtney does not “accept” that it happened, she tells me what *did* happen, without me asking ...
Click to expand...
But you haven't given us the context. That chat was clearly not your first conversation on the topic, and we can't guess what went before if you don't tell us. You told us the manager instructed the coworker to investigate you. I asked if you had evidence that happened. It now appears you don't, but rather you decided it was "obvious".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom