I'm very interested in hearing other peoples' thoughts on TV psychics currently on television in the UK (and US). I am a sceptic, but do watch these psychic programmes from time to time out of interest.
The programmes we get over here in the UK are:
6ixth Sense (Colin Fry)
Crossing Over (John Edward)
Beyond with James Van Pragh
A psychometry programme with antiques with Derek Akorah
Street Psychic with Tony (someone-or-other!)
I find the above programmes more and more unbelievable as I watch them. I had never heard of cold readings or hot readings until James Randi did the demo of a hot reading on that psychic programme the other week. It made me look long and hard at the so-called evidence that these TV psychics come up with.
James Van Pragh miraculously gets the person whom the questioner is asking for immediately. His evidence is very vague.
John Edward fires point after point at people and they latch onto a hit, ignoring the misses that surrounded that hit. He seems to get a bit aggressive as well if the families disagree with something he says, and vehemently sticks to his own 'information'.
Colin Fry overwhelms his guests with sympathy and elaborates on 'evidence' only after the guest has confirmed his point.
And I thought the Diana Seance with Craig and Jane Hamilton-Parker was a complete load of tripe, with nothing new than what's speculated in the papers. A greedy money-making excercise if ever I saw one.
I am starting to believe these people are really just preying on the berieved for the purposes of their own fame and fortune (fortune here relating to money, not the futuristic outcomes of situations!)
I would be interested to hear others' thoughts on this subject- both for and against the TV psychics.
Lilac
The programmes we get over here in the UK are:
6ixth Sense (Colin Fry)
Crossing Over (John Edward)
Beyond with James Van Pragh
A psychometry programme with antiques with Derek Akorah
Street Psychic with Tony (someone-or-other!)
I find the above programmes more and more unbelievable as I watch them. I had never heard of cold readings or hot readings until James Randi did the demo of a hot reading on that psychic programme the other week. It made me look long and hard at the so-called evidence that these TV psychics come up with.
James Van Pragh miraculously gets the person whom the questioner is asking for immediately. His evidence is very vague.
John Edward fires point after point at people and they latch onto a hit, ignoring the misses that surrounded that hit. He seems to get a bit aggressive as well if the families disagree with something he says, and vehemently sticks to his own 'information'.
Colin Fry overwhelms his guests with sympathy and elaborates on 'evidence' only after the guest has confirmed his point.
And I thought the Diana Seance with Craig and Jane Hamilton-Parker was a complete load of tripe, with nothing new than what's speculated in the papers. A greedy money-making excercise if ever I saw one.
I am starting to believe these people are really just preying on the berieved for the purposes of their own fame and fortune (fortune here relating to money, not the futuristic outcomes of situations!)
I would be interested to hear others' thoughts on this subject- both for and against the TV psychics.
Lilac

lol