The article implies that their reason for including magicians is more superstitious than logical but I wonder if the author missed the point - real magicians are more likely to see through bullsh!t and propaganda.
I suppose army people are simply pragmatic: Anybody with a leverage on public opinion is a risk factor in their book. How or why is basically irrelevant.
The article implies that their reason for including magicians is more superstitious than logical but I wonder if the author missed the point - real magicians are more likely to see through bullsh!t and propaganda.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.