porch
Muse
- Joined
- May 16, 2006
- Messages
- 816
Sometimes I think that debating truthers at all is counterproductive. On the other hand, sometimes I can't help myself.
I'm engaged in an online debate with one, and I mentioned that FDNY members would be none too pleased to be accused of being part of a cover-up that murdered some of their freinds and colleagues.
They responded by saying:
There is so much info out there. Could someone point me in the right direction? I'm specifically interested in 1) What firefighters are my adversary talking about? 2) How come some of the FDNY are in on the conspiracy but others aren't? How does that work? The truther 'logic' is so all over the place. I'm befuddled.
I'm engaged in an online debate with one, and I mentioned that FDNY members would be none too pleased to be accused of being part of a cover-up that murdered some of their freinds and colleagues.
They responded by saying:
Many fire fighters, victims, family members, emergency responders, police officers, pilots, and scholars are members of various organizations asking the same questions about 9/11 that the people referred to as 'conspiracy nuts' are asking.
There is so much info out there. Could someone point me in the right direction? I'm specifically interested in 1) What firefighters are my adversary talking about? 2) How come some of the FDNY are in on the conspiracy but others aren't? How does that work? The truther 'logic' is so all over the place. I'm befuddled.
Last edited: