• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Troophemisms

jhunter1163

beer-swilling semiliterate
jhunter1163
Joined
Jul 18, 2006
Messages
25,902
Location
Connecticut, or King Arthur's Court. Hard to tell
I was reading some nonsense the other day over at SLC when I began to notice a theme. When Twoofers want to be taken seriously, there are code phrases that they use. These phrases sound less offensive/wacky/nonsensical than they actually are, but the underlying message is the same. These phrases include:

Alternative theory: Something so wacky that even Twoofers don't give it much credence (e. g. holographic planes, pods).

Mainstream media: Usually implied to be under the control of Zionists (see below). Generally deemed by Twoofers to be unreliable except when reports support a particular theory. Erroneous early reports in the MSM, particularly ones that can be spun as sinister (dancing Israelis, surviving hijackers, etc.) are immediately seized upon as gospel.

Independent media: Bastions of journalistic integrity such as Prisonplanet, AFP, Killtown's blog, etc. These are usually assumed to have the "inside story", whatever that might be.

Zionists: JOOOOOS. Thinly disguised anti-Semitism.

Truth movement: Group of angry white guys with IQ's in the mid-80s, joined by their common hatred of GWB and general sense of powerlessness.

I hereby name these and all similar terms "troophemisms". A troophemism is, by definition, a word or phrase that is intended to make the Troof movement appear less nutty than it actually is.
 
This is great, though some of the definitions may be too precise.

For example, it seems like some of the Truthers will call anyone a "Zionist." I think I've been called a Zionist (mostly for making fun of Alex Jones). So by now, there's no coherent connection to Judaism whatsoever.

Also, the Truthers aren't so much joined by hatred of GWB as by hatred of all government. They are anti-government bigots who would be attacking a Democratic President and making false accusations against him or her, too. For the Troofers, the Democrats and Republicans are two heads on the same beast--unbeknownst to any historian, journalist, political scientist, or sociologist in the world.

Some other possible troophemisms:

Government shill: someone who disagrees or challenges one's pet theory; any normal person

Brainwashing: non-conspiratorial thinking, thought processes which involve documented information and scientific data

Smoking gun: any peculiarity or anomaly in the official story, misconstrued as proof of an elaborate conspiracy

To expose: to slander, smear, or make false accusations

Research: watching YouTube clips over and over again
 
Last edited:
Research: watching YouTube clips over and over again
Click to expand...


Booley attempts to debate:

I have no 'facts' on what exactly happened. Neither do you.

The only FACTS than can be agreed upon between both sides are those shown in the videos. Video doesn't lie.

The video shows it wasn't a stock American Airlines.
Your Government said it was.

The video shows no evidence of a plane at the Pentagon or Pennsylvania. Just small hunks of metal.
Your Government said there were planes there.

The video shows no plane hitting the Pentagon. Just a fireball.
Your Government refuses to show the video because it will expose what it really was. What was it really? Who knows. Why hide it? What's to hide? Hmm?

Regardless. These are some FACTS we can both see for ourselves. If you refute them, fine- that's your job here. Even if you agree with them, there is no way in hell you'll be admitting that here because your purpose will be lost.

Those are some FACTS I can give you. The whole world can give them to you. The only facts we can give to you are that the Government's 'official' story DOES NOT MATCH THE VIDEO. So, they are lying. It's under your nose but you are just not quick enough to catch it.

Your 'facts'- the 'facts' you can present to use- are those of text appearing on internet sites. Somebody wrote them. In many cases, from people who weren't there. So, the info is filtered down from person to person to person to the internet. It gets skewed along the way.

You're just sitting infront of your screen reading ***** on the internet and then deciding what you want to believe and what you don't. Then you decide that this hunk of text on this site is true, and that other text over there isn't. Doesn't even matter who wrote it. Or where that info came from. Or how many people it came down from. Hey, it was an expert who wrote it! So, it must be true!! Even though the VIDEO says otherwise!! Whatever sounds good to you, right? lol

I'm giving you FACTS. If there was no video recorded that day, then we'd have no case and the truth movement would be paper-thin. We're moving on the video recorded that day.

You're in denial over the video, so you want to rely on reports and internet sites to come up with your own screwy idea over what happened.
Click to expand...

http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=1867

:mrocks
 
Just Asking Questions means Not Wanting Answers

Very Interesting means something is a small minor anomaly to regular human beings but proof of massive conspiracy to troofers.

Law of 100% If a witness recollection isn't 100 per cent accurate then he/she should be dismissed totally.

Says What I Want to Hear Corollary Except if anything that the witness says agrees with the troofer.

So-called Experts Someone not to be believed just because they have advanced degrees and years of experience in a particular field.

Expert Someone with no training in a particular field but who can issue analyses that dispute all the so-called experts.

Facts Misinterpretations of things that appear in videos.
 
Violating the laws of physics - From studying the evidence, events occured in conformance with scientific law, but since I've never actually taken a science course I'm much too dumb to understand.

Professional engineer - Disinfo agent

Peer review paper - Posting one theories on the internet and having fellow troofers agree with you.

Kevin Ryan - President of UL, the company that stamped the WTC towers, certifying that they would stand forever barring use of a thermite initiated controlled demolition.

Youtube - The world's leading consortium of scientific evidence.
 
These are all hilarious!

My addition:

False Flag -- name for those mysterious and unidentifiable people who are responsible for every misfortune, from double-parking to 9/11, when Twoofers can't provide documented proof to blame their nemeses.
 
Censorship: Practiced by the Zionist-controlled MSM (see above), censorship is supposedly the real reason the Twoof (tm) hasn't already brought down the government. The fact that virtually all of the Twoofers' so-called evidence is nonsensical is utterly irrelevant.
 
Sheep/Sheeple -- Not to be confused with shill, a sheep is someone who refuses to examine the evidence and your analysis of it, or is too simple minded to comprehend it. You can tell they have not paid attention to the Truth™ because they do not believe the Truth™ (naturally anyone who has seen your evidence cant help but be convinced, because no one has higher standard of evidence than the truth movement)
 
"Planted" Evidence: any real, actual, physical evidence really, actually, physically located at the scene, that disproves a given conspiracy theory and cannot be explained away by holograms, CGI, starwars space beams, etc.
 
Controlled Demolition: A process initiated by thermite causing large buildings to spread debris in all directions damaging nearby structures.

Within their own footprint: Any large undefined area around a controlled demolition.

Freefall: A speed roughly equivalent to the speed of gravity.
 
Beam Weapon: A currently non-existent quantum weapon that entered our dimension during a 3-hour period on 9/11/2001 and got a space woody for steel-framed buildings and five-sided buildings. Oh, and half of some automobiles. Then it winked out of existence and is not included in the 9/11 Omission Report.
 
The X-Files: A factural serial documentary about how the government operates and what technology it possesses

i was watching my x-files dvds and in the 5th season episode kill switch the DoD has orbital weapons platforms capable of firing a laser and destroying a cargo container or small RV with pinpoint accuracy

therefore, the technology is proven to exist
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom